- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
RN 104 "Remove inactive volumes to use disk" despite passed disk test???
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
RN 104 "Remove inactive volumes to use disk" despite passed disk test???
Hello everybody,
Three days ago my ReadyNAS RN104 started malfunctioning and displayed the error message "Remove inactive volumes to use disk. Disk # 1,2,3,4." But the logs didn't show any drive malfunction, so I performed another disk-test, which took a little over 10h.
However, all drives (in RAID5 configuration) passed the test and showed no signs of being corrupted:
Disk sdd: HostID: 2fe5356c Flags: 0x0 Size: 7814037168 (3726 GB) Free: 4062 Controller 0 Channel: 0 Model: WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 Serial: WD-WCC4E3TV57AA Firmware: 82.00A82 Class: SATA (2) RPM: 5400 SMART data Reallocated Sectors: 0 Reallocation Events: 0 Spin Retry Count: 0 Current Pending Sector Count: 0 Uncorrectable Sector Count: 0 Temperature: 43 Start/Stop Count: 5469 Power-On Hours: 22655 Power Cycle Count: 1157 Load Cycle Count: 5421 Latest Self Test: Passed Disk sdc: HostID: 2fe5356c Flags: 0x0 Size: 7814037168 (3726 GB) Free: 4062 Controller 0 Channel: 1 Model: WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 Serial: WD-WCC4E4ERCDPJ Firmware: 82.00A82 Class: SATA (2) RPM: 5400 SMART data Reallocated Sectors: 0 Reallocation Events: 0 Spin Retry Count: 0 Current Pending Sector Count: 0 Uncorrectable Sector Count: 0 Temperature: 49 Start/Stop Count: 5774 Power-On Hours: 22657 Power Cycle Count: 1157 Load Cycle Count: 5728 Latest Self Test: Passed Disk sdb: HostID: 2fe5356c Flags: 0x0 Size: 7814037168 (3726 GB) Free: 4062 Controller 0 Channel: 2 Model: WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 Serial: WD-WCC4ECNZLH1X Firmware: 82.00A82 Class: SATA (2) RPM: 5400 SMART data Reallocated Sectors: 0 Reallocation Events: 0 Spin Retry Count: 0 Current Pending Sector Count: 0 Uncorrectable Sector Count: 0 Temperature: 47 Start/Stop Count: 5980 Power-On Hours: 22659 Power Cycle Count: 1142 Load Cycle Count: 5948 Latest Self Test: Passed Disk sda: HostID: 2fe5356c Flags: 0x0 Size: 7814037168 (3726 GB) Free: 4062 Controller 0 Channel: 3 Model: WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 Serial: WD-WCC4E0ZY6VNN Firmware: 82.00A82 Class: SATA (2) RPM: 5400 SMART data Reallocated Sectors: 0 Reallocation Events: 0 Spin Retry Count: 0 Current Pending Sector Count: 0 Uncorrectable Sector Count: 0 Temperature: 43 Start/Stop Count: 6866 Power-On Hours: 22661 Power Cycle Count: 1142 Load Cycle Count: 6834 Latest Self Test: Passed
Because the results showed me that the disks are not at fault, I performed an OS-reset.
But the issue persisted and now the interface is even more sluggish than before and any attempt to change the default password results in an error. Booting in read-only mode also didn't help...
I've been performing a disk-balance and defrag job weekly, while only half of my storage is used up, so what's going on here?? Does the device have an internal flash storage that could be corrupted or something?
Firmware version: 6.9.3
OS-Update history:
[2015/01/22 13:47:27] Factory default initiated due to new disks (no RAID, no partitions)! [2015/01/22 13:48:09] Defaulting to X-RAID2 mode, RAID level 5 [2015/01/22 13:48:41] Factory default initiated on ReadyNASOS 6.2.0 (ReadyNASOS). [2015/01/24 10:12:13] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.2.0 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.2.2 (ReadyNASOS). [2015/01/29 07:06:42] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.2.2 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.2.2 (ReadyNASOS). [2015/05/11 14:42:40] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.2.2 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.2.4 (ReadyNASOS). [2015/08/03 07:20:42] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.2.4 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.2.5 (ReadyNASOS). [1969/12/31 17:00:57] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.2.5 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.4.0 (ReadyNASOS). [2016/01/03 07:02:14] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.4.0 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.4.1 (ReadyNASOS). [2016/02/28 15:06:49] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.4.1 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.4.2 (ReadyNASOS). [2016/05/28 15:53:42] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.4.2 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.5.0 (ReadyNASOS). [2016/06/30 15:04:37] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.5.0 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.5.1 (ReadyNASOS). [2017/01/19 07:41:45] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.5.1 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.6.1 (ReadyNASOS). [2017/05/27 15:58:02 UTC] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.6.1 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.7.4 (ReadyNASOS). [2017/06/28 08:50:52 UTC] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.7.4 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.7.5 (ReadyNASOS). [2017/08/31 15:14:18 UTC] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.7.5 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.8.0 (ReadyNASOS). [2018/03/08 19:01:09 UTC] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.8.0 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.9.2 (ReadyNASOS). [2018/04/08 12:20:13 UTC] Updated from ReadyNASOS 6.9.2 (ReadyNASOS) to 6.9.3 (ReadyNASOS).
The kernel log shows a lot of critical BTRFS errors on the day the NAS started malfunctioning:
May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 624 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:541 btree_csum_one_bio+0x10c/0x118() May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: Modules linked in: vpd(PO) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 624 Comm: kworker/u2:4 Tainted: P W O 4.4.116.armada.1 #1 May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: Hardware name: Marvell Armada 370/XP (Device Tree) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: Workqueue: btrfs-worker btrfs_worker_helper May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c0015f44>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c00120fc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x18) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c00120fc>] (show_stack) from [<c03a6080>] (dump_stack+0x78/0x9c) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c03a6080>] (dump_stack) from [<c00249c8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x74/0xac) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c00249c8>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0024a1c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x28) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c0024a1c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c02aab64>] (btree_csum_one_bio+0x10c/0x118) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c02aab64>] (btree_csum_one_bio) from [<c02a93e4>] (run_one_async_start+0x34/0x48) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c02a93e4>] (run_one_async_start) from [<c02eaed0>] (normal_work_helper+0x84/0x1a4) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c02eaed0>] (normal_work_helper) from [<c0038148>] (process_one_work+0x11c/0x334) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c0038148>] (process_one_work) from [<c00383c8>] (worker_thread+0x30/0x49c) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c00383c8>] (worker_thread) from [<c003d4b0>] (kthread+0x104/0x124) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: [<c003d4b0>] (kthread) from [<c000f580>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x34) May 31 13:55:34 Banana_Stand kernel: ---[ end trace a1b4f282bb2b4892 ]--- May 31 13:56:08 Banana_Stand kernel: BTRFS critical (device md127): unable to find logical 36128555008 len 4096 May 31 13:56:08 Banana_Stand kernel: BTRFS critical (device md127): unable to find logical 36128555008 len 4096 May 31 13:56:09 Banana_Stand kernel: BTRFS critical (device md127): unable to find logical 36128555008 len 4096 May 31 13:56:09 Banana_Stand kernel: BTRFS critical (device md127): unable to find logical 36128555008 len 4096 May 31 13:56:09 Banana_Stand kernel: BTRFS critical (device md127): unable to find logical 36128555008 len 4096 May 31 13:56:10 Banana_Stand kernel: BTRFS critical (device md127): unable to find logical 36128555008 len 4096
I also performed a memory test but it got stuck at the first second and didn't progress even after 10 hours. Please let me know if any of you have experienced something similar. Any help is appreciated!
Kernel log is attached.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: RN 104 "Remove inactive volumes to use disk" despite passed disk test???
Hi @Tartarus116
Welcome to the Community!
The BTRFS errors showing that is was not able to mount/read tree root. I would suggest contacting NETGEAR Support so they can assist you on recovering the volume or data.
You can purchase a Pay-Per-Incident contract if you don't have any support available though if your NAS needs Data recovery this service has a different charge. Please see Data Recovery
Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: RN 104 "Remove inactive volumes to use disk" despite passed disk test???
Support refused to accept my prepaid credit card, so I ended up solving the problem myself for free.
What I did:
1) Removed drives from NAS & connected them to PC
2) Tried almost every data-recovery software out there, until I found one that supports the BTRFS file system: ReclaiMe
3) ReclaiMe auto-detected the RAID volume and its parameters and automatically re-built the RAID.
4) Transferred all of the data onto single drive.
I guess the most likely cause of the original issue was the broken memory in the NAS.
Seriously disappointed by Netgear Hardware lifetime and even more disappointed by **bleep**ty support.
Hope this helps people who have also experience this issue.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: RN 104 "Remove inactive volumes to use disk" despite passed disk test???
Why are you thinking the issue was caused by faulty memory in the ReadyNAS?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: RN 104 "Remove inactive volumes to use disk" despite passed disk test???
I mentioned at the end of my original post that the NAS had failed the memory test, and left me unable to change configurations, such as my password. The disks are absolutely fine, and even though I got a lot of BTRFS errors in the kernel log, I was able to completely recover my data with the ReclaiMe software.
I might look into replacing the memory and see if that works. But for now, I'm just happy I got my data back.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: RN 104 "Remove inactive volumes to use disk" despite passed disk test???
Hi @Tartarus116
Good to hear you were able to get it back, there might be issiues with the system Support is using renderng it impossible to use your credit card.
ReclaiMe is what Community users often recommend when it comes to Data recovery so that's good you were able to discover it and pull out your data.
Unfortunately RN104 memory is soldered so memory cannot be replaced. If your RN104 is less than 3 years then you may want to contact Support back to RMA the device.
Regards