NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
drwilki22
Aug 13, 2021Aspirant
ORBI - Port 443 Closed even with Port Forwarding?
I have an RBR50 connected to an AT&T modem/router with IP passthrough. Synology web server is connected to the Orbi. Port Forwarding is enabled for 80 and 443 between Orbi and Synology. Howev...
- Aug 15, 2021
Solution discovered:
I have AT&T as a service provider for Fiber; formerly I also had their U-Verse service with wireless receivers/DVR's.
Come to find out AT&T does block Port 443 for any inbound traffic. They specifically use this port for their wireless receivers/DVR's. Despite cancelling U-Verse last year, the IP/MacID of these services were still listed/cached in the AT&T modem/router which resulted in a permanent closure on Port 443.
SOLUTION FOR USERS WITH A SIMILAR ISSUE (assuming you do not have wireless receivers and just ATT fiber):
1. Login to ATT's modem router admin portal at 192.168.1.254
2. Click on Device>Device List>Clear and Rescan for Devices.
3. Perform a factory reset of the AT&T BGW210 modem/router, add port forwarding rules for allowed ports, then re-configure it for IP Passthrough to the Orbi again.
4. Apply or disable any additional settings needed for a secure network hosted by ATT or the Orbi.
This is probably a good solution for anyone with the following or similar equipment:
- At&t Arris bgw210-700
- Orbi
- Home NAS
antinode
Aug 14, 2021Guru
> [...] I can access the domain externally (via standard port 80,
> unencrypted) or while connected to my local network via port 80
> (unencrypted) and 443 (encrypted). [...]
I don't know what "access" or "the domain" or "externally" means to
you, or which actual URL you're using, or where you're using it, or what
any resulting error message might have been. Are you using some web
browser or other, running on some computer or other, which is situated
someplace or other, and you're specifying some URL or other, and getting
some actual result or other?
> https://community.netgear.com/t5/x/x/m-p/1859106
Did you read any of that guide, or am I talking to myself? Which
part of "actual" was unclear to you? Care to answer any of the
questions, or report the results of any of the suggested tests?
> [...] My ISP has confirmed [...]
Actual results from actual tests might be more valuable than an ISP's
assurance.
> All forwarding rules are established.
That's swell. I'm glad that you're happy. Sadly, my weak psychic
powers have not gained strength, so I _still_ know no more about any of
that than I did when I complained before.
> I see three possibilities for port forwarding to (any) port not
> working:
drwilki22
Aug 15, 2021Aspirant
Solution discovered:
I have AT&T as a service provider for Fiber; formerly I also had their U-Verse service with wireless receivers/DVR's.
Come to find out AT&T does block Port 443 for any inbound traffic. They specifically use this port for their wireless receivers/DVR's. Despite cancelling U-Verse last year, the IP/MacID of these services were still listed/cached in the AT&T modem/router which resulted in a permanent closure on Port 443.
SOLUTION FOR USERS WITH A SIMILAR ISSUE (assuming you do not have wireless receivers and just ATT fiber):
1. Login to ATT's modem router admin portal at 192.168.1.254
2. Click on Device>Device List>Clear and Rescan for Devices.
3. Perform a factory reset of the AT&T BGW210 modem/router, add port forwarding rules for allowed ports, then re-configure it for IP Passthrough to the Orbi again.
4. Apply or disable any additional settings needed for a secure network hosted by ATT or the Orbi.
This is probably a good solution for anyone with the following or similar equipment:
- At&t Arris bgw210-700
- Orbi
- Home NAS
- antinodeAug 15, 2021Guru
> Come to find out AT&T does block Port 443 for any inbound traffic.
> [...]"AT&T" (your ISP) and "the AT&T BGW210 modem/router" are two
different entities.
> "3" sounds potentially applicable.> [...] Care to answer any of the questions, or report the results of
> any of the suggested tests?I'd expect the tests suggested in "3" to have revealed such a problem
pretty easily. If "from a system on your LAN, try using the router's
WAN/Internet IP address" works, but actual outside-world access fails,
then something on the ISP side of the RBR50 would seem to be implicated.