NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

Bernie_in_MA's avatar
Bernie_in_MA
Aspirant
Jan 23, 2023

RBR50: one satellite works fine; other can handle Ethernet or Wi-Fi but not both

About two years ago (in February 2020), I got an RBR50 with two satellites to use with a new Verizon FIOS connection and an existing Ethernet patch panel with Cat5 running to many rooms in my house. The RBR50 is in the basement, cabled between the patch panel and the Verizon FIOS unit/wireless router. The RBR50 operates in bridge mode (I think that's what it's called; IP addresses are doled out only by the Verizon unit). One satellite (RBS50) is one floor above and one room away from the RBR50, connected through the patch panel via Ethernet. Wi-Fi and Ethernet connections between other devices and this satellite are fine. The other satellite has, in retrospect, never worked properly. Its home is in a bedroom that is two floors above the RBR50 and a couple of rooms away (at the opposite end of the house from the good RBS50). One of my main reasons for getting the Orbi system was to improve Wi-Fi to that bedroom. 

 

After substantial experimentation (and partially giving up by putting a Netgear EAX15 range extender in the bedroom, connected as an access point through a small switch in the bedroom to the Ethernet jack to the patch panel), I think I've confirmed the following:

 

1. If I don't use an Ethernet port on this RBS50 to connect to the RBR50, I get a 5GHz connection to the router, and Wi-Fi devices can connect to this satellite. Of course, I don't get to rely Ethernet for the backhaul, and the 5GHz connection to the bedroom in question (and nearby bedrooms) is spotty.

2. If I use any of the four Ethernet ports on this RBS50 to connect to the RBR50 (whether directly or through the patch panel, trying at least three different Cat5 cables), then this RBS50 and all devices patched into it I get an Ethernet connection. But the Wi-Fi on the RBS50 doesn't work.

 

In short, one RBS50 works fine. For the other RBS50: I can use Ethernet; or I can use Wi-Fi; but I can't use both.

 

Firmware is V2.7.4.24. Multiple times I've uninstalled the flaky RBS50, reset it, and reinstalled it. I've not had the energy to try a factory reset on the RBR50. 

 

Any suggestions?

8 Replies

  • FW version the same on the RBS as on the RBR? 

    Try swapping RBS with each other to see of the problem follows with the one RBS or doesn't. 

     

    What is the size of your home? Sq Ft?
    What is the distance between the router and extender(s)? 30 feet is recommended in between them to begin with depending upon building materials when wirelessly connected. Basement is not recommended for the RBR. All that concrete and steel in the foundation can cause problems for wireless and wireless connected RBS. 

     

    CAT6 is recommended. 

    • Bernie_in_MA's avatar
      Bernie_in_MA
      Aspirant

      "FW version the same on the RBS as on the RBR?" Yes--both RBS50 units have same firmware version number as RBR50.

       

      "Try swapping RBS with each other to see of the problem follows with the one RBS or doesn't." Probably worth doing, although it seems unlikely to reveal much. The problematic RBS50 has the same problems when connected through the patch panel from separate wall jacks in 2 different rooms that are 2 floors away from the RBR50, from a family room less than 20 feet from the RBR50, and when connected directly to the RBR50 from inches away. Well, I'm guessing a little about what happens at a distance of inches; I do know that with an Ethernet between the two units, I seem to have no Wi-Fi on the RBS50.

       

      "What is the size of your home? Sq Ft?" About 2,500 of finished space. Walls aren't anything special--only concrete is for exterior walls. The RBR50 lives in the basement next to the patch panel, the FIOS equipment, a 16-port gigabit switch, and some other stuff. 

       

      "What is the distance between the router and extender(s)?" The distance shouldn't really matter in terms of connecting the router to the satellites, as the Cat5 cable in the walls does that. I suppose that the distance might affect which unit a Wi-Fi device tries to connect to, but I'm ignorant about such subjects. The satellite with no problems is about 30 feet away plus one floor from the router. The problematic unit has been tried multiple places (see above).

       

      "CAT6 is recommended" No doubt. But I had most of my house wired in 2000, when Cat5 was young and Cat6 a dream. Some of my wiring (not used by the wonky satellite except for some tests) dates to about 1993. Using my longest run with that ancient wire (maybe 30 feet, including twists and turns), my main computer gets a wired speedtest of over 600Mbps (according to Ookla); and higher, according to Verizon's numbers. 

       

      Thanks for the suggestions and questions. I'll try putting swapping the problematic RBS50 for the one that works and see what happens. 

       

       

      • FURRYe38's avatar
        FURRYe38
        Guru

        What is the brand and model# of the LAN switch? 

        CAT5 cabling or the line up to the RBS remote location could be faulty. Also CAT5 officially only supports 100Mpbs, not really rated for 1000Mbs which Orbi supports. Why swapping RBS locations to see if the problem follows or not will be helpful. 

         

        Distance between RBR and RBS is important, regardless of wireless or ethernet connected. 

        20feet is too close between the RBR and RBS. 

         

        For that size of home, the RBR and just 1 RBS would work, even if ethernet connected. When I run my RBK50, with RBS ethernet connected, it's covering a 5000sq ft home. No issues.