NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Miklosman
Mar 09, 2020Aspirant
RBR50 with RBS50 - WiFi camera connect to distant router
Cameras and all HomeKit devices connect to a far away RBR50 o RBS50. In consequence not working well because having a low WiFi signal. Is there a way to fix some devices only to some satellites RBS50 ...
theoak
Mar 10, 2020Luminary
Its a bit of an up hill battle.
- The device decides what to connect to.
- If the router comes up before the satellite, it will likely connect to the router before the closer satellite.
Some ideas:
- Turn off beamforming. Beamforming can actually increase the range and may cause the device to hang on to a connection to an access point that is actually farther away.
- Turn off fast roaming. If you have a device between two satellites, fast roaming (if the device supports it) may cause the device to flip between the two.
- tomschmidtMar 12, 2020Virtuoso
I made some time to experiment a bit. I normally have Implicit Beamforming and Fast Roaming both enabled. Disabling Beamforming did not help, nor did disabling Fast Roaming, nor disability both. I also tried reducing the power level of the 2.4GHz signal, but even at 50% power the IoT device would use the radio from the router (furthest away) even though two satellites are closer with stronger signals. Once reduced to 25% power, the IoT device did connect to the satellite since the router's 2.4GHz signal was to weak, however then all my 2.4GHz devices on the other end of the house where the router is lost complete connectivity.
Conclusion: Implicit Beamforming nor Fast Roaming affect the race condition of IoT devices binding to the router before any satellites (provided the routers signal is strong enough). This race condition is due to the radio being turned on for the router before the satellites, thus clients bind to the first strong-enough radio signal they see.
I can understand that the 5GHz backhaul has to be enabled first. Once the backhaul is established, then the 2.4GHz and 5GHz client radios should be enabled simultaneously on the router and all satellites. I am wondering if NG is instead enabling the backhaul and all client radios on the router simultaneously, long before the satellites backhaul and client radio is working, thus causing this race condition.
- FURRYe38Mar 12, 2020Guru - Experienced User
Good explanation and info. I agree.
- MiklosmanMar 14, 2020Aspirant
I tried all and it did not work.
I have 1 RBR50, 2 RBS50 and 1 outdoor RBS50Y.
The Outdor satellite is very far the router like 60 feet. My camera is 6 feet from the outdoor satellite. THe camera connects to the router.
So fast roaming, beamforming, reducing power. Nothing works welll. When a camera connects, the other one connect to another satellite farther away that iti is near it.
Netgear should permit negate specific IOT devices to connect to a sattellite/router.
WHY? BECAUSE IOT S DO NOT MOVE. THEY NEED A FIX ACCESS. ONLY LAPTOPS, MOBILE NEED THE CHANGING OF SATELLITES FOR BETTER SIGNALS.
VERY TIRED OF THIS MATTER.
tomschmidt wrote:I made some time to experiment a bit. I normally have Implicit Beamforming and Fast Roaming both enabled. Disabling Beamforming did not help, nor did disabling Fast Roaming, nor disability both. I also tried reducing the power level of the 2.4GHz signal, but even at 50% power the IoT device would use the radio from the router (furthest away) even though two satellites are closer with stronger signals. Once reduced to 25% power, the IoT device did connect to the satellite since the router's 2.4GHz signal was to weak, however then all my 2.4GHz devices on the other end of the house where the router is lost complete connectivity.
Conclusion: Implicit Beamforming nor Fast Roaming affect the race condition of IoT devices binding to the router before any satellites (provided the routers signal is strong enough). This race condition is due to the radio being turned on for the router before the satellites, thus clients bind to the first strong-enough radio signal they see.
I can understand that the 5GHz backhaul has to be enabled first. Once the backhaul is established, then the 2.4GHz and 5GHz client radios should be enabled simultaneously on the router and all satellites. I am wondering if NG is instead enabling the backhaul and all client radios on the router simultaneously, long before the satellites backhaul and client radio is working, thus causing this race condition.