NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
DaleE
Aug 10, 2020Aspirant
Help with network planning
Hi all, I’m looking for assistance on replacing my existing wifi setup. I have spent hours reading the Netger site but am unsure which products to use (they all seem so similar!) The situatio...
- Aug 10, 2020
It has been my experience that WIFI mesh systems work way better than routers and extenders and really don't cost much more. So I would go with a wireless mesh system.
Since you have a ranch style home, I would go with a 3 unit system such as the RBK53 or RBK23, for a more even coverage throughout the home.
The RBK53 system, (1 router and 2 satellites) is a great system, has wide coverage, is very fasy, because of the enhanced backhaul channel and is Tri-band. But if you are going to wire your satellites to your router, the faster backhaul is a moot point. If you are going to use wired backhaul, take a look at the RBK23, 1 router and 2 satellites). It has great coverage, but not as much as the RBK53, is also very fast, is Tri-band and should fit your needs. I know I'm suggesting a 3 unit system. It is because your other option is 1 at each end of your home, which an RBK50 or RBK20 would work. If placed correctly, you would get good coverage, but not as good as 3 units.
Here is a comparison:
RBK23 Vs RBK50
The RBK23 is a more economical model to cover the needs of medium to large sized houses with some reductions in hardware to lower the price.
The main hardware differences of the RBK23 compared to RBK50 (which is the best selling kit) are the following:
- Smaller size: (5.6 x 2.4 x 6.6 in) compared to (6.4 x 3.1 x 8.0 in).
- Fewer Internal Antennas: The RBK23 has 4 internal antennas compared to 6 antennas of RBK50.
- Fewer Wired Ethernet Ports: The RBK23 has 2 Ethernet Ports while the RBK50 has 4.
- Wireless Backhaul speed: The RBK23 has 866Mbps backhaul speed compared to 1733Mbps of the RBK50
- Less coverage area The RBK23 covers up to 6000 sq ft and is rated at AC2200 compared to the RBK53 7500 Sq Ft at AC3000
Other than the above hardware differences, the main features of the RBK50 are also supported by RBK23 as well (such as Tri-band WiFi, wireless backhaul on 5Ghz band, beamforming, excellent speed performance and coverage etc).
Regarding WIFI 6, right now there isn't much advantage unless you are going to upgrade all your devices to it. For the long haul, I've found that a newer faster technology will come out just about the time you will want to upgrade. However if money is no object nd you want the latest platform, go with the WIFI 6 system. The RBK753 would work for you.
AwesomeQA
Aug 11, 2020Apprentice
Since I have RBR50 with many Sats wired and wireless, 7 sats connected to RBR50, and I have RBK852.
I would say don’t buy Orbi AX, it is not ready for prime usage because of the OS issues.
Use Orbi AC which is more stable and cheaper than AX.
I would say don’t buy Orbi AX, it is not ready for prime usage because of the OS issues.
Use Orbi AC which is more stable and cheaper than AX.
- DaleEAug 11, 2020Aspirant
Thanks for the input. Reliability is a key requirement here, so will stick to the AC series.
- FURRYe38Aug 11, 2020Guru - Experienced User
I haven't seen to many issues with my orbi AX. Been working well since v32 came out. Most stable FW IMO.
Firmware Version: V3.2.15.32_1.3.25
CPU Load: 10.43%
Memory Usage(Used/Total): 483 MB/867 MB
System Uptime: 13 days 13:43:29
NG hasn't made Orbi AC RBS compatible with Orbi AX. Not sure if or when that will happen. You can connect RBS from Orbi AC via eithernet is all. RBS50Y works in extender mode with Orbi AX.