NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Will Orbi support Arlo natively?
Got an email from Arlo introducing Orbi.. So Orbi will natively support Arlo right? Like the R7000 was supposed to?
Logical answer: the 'Arlo Base Station' is nothing but a wireless router. I ALREADY HAVE a wireless router, so why do I need another one? Just let the Arlo cameras use the router I already have.
Technical reason: the 2.4 ghz spectrum is incredibly overcrowded due to all the wireless routers. In fact, of the 12 available channels, only 3 (1,6,12) are truly isolated. All other channels overlap eachoher (each channel overlaps the 5 nearest channels). Why add another unnecessary wireless network to even further crowd the overcrowded spectrum?
Yes I know the Arlo Base Station tries to make its channel match the channel of the wireless router it is being used with, but only when it first boots up. This means unless the user pays strict attention to the channel settings and reboot sequences (when a reboot is needed for either wireless router) chances are the channels will at some point overlap.
This is a pain (if the main router is set to 'Auto' channel selection, then it needs to be rebooted first, and then the arlo base station, after the main router starts broadcasting it's SSID - for anyone wondering)
Technical reason: the 2.4 ghz spectrum is incredibly overcrowded due to all the wireless routers. In fact, of the 12 available channels, only 3 (1,6,12) are truly isolated. All other channels overlap eachoher (each channel overlaps the 5 nearest channels). Why add another unnecessary wireless network to even further crowd the overcrowded spectrum?
Yes I know the Arlo Base Station tries to make its channel match the channel of the wireless router it is being used with, but only when it first boots up. This means unless the user pays strict attention to the channel settings and reboot sequences (when a reboot is needed for either wireless router) chances are the channels will at some point overlap.
This is a pain (if the main router is set to 'Auto' channel selection, then it needs to be rebooted first, and then the arlo base station, after the main router starts broadcasting it's SSID - for anyone wondering)
Thanks, I never thought about how my Arlo base station selected its wireless channel or how it could even tell. Fun read: https://community.netgear.com/t5/Arlo-Wire-Free-camera/Is-it-possible-to-change-the-wifi-channel/td-p/1537. They seem to want the Arlo camera traffic separated in channel from their household wifi traffic (using one of the 3 isolated channels). If a single router publishes 2 different SSIDs on the same channel then is there no interference/performance degredation compared to separate routers using 2 isolated channels?
If a single router broadcasts 2 SSIDs on one channel then there may be performance degradation. The router has to share one channel between two SSIDs. This is worse than using 2 isolated channels but it is better than using 2 overlapping channels. The Arlo thread you linked has a link to a really good article that explains why.
http://www.metageek.com/training/resources/adjacent-channel-congestion.html
I don't own an Arlo system, but I would also want it to run on an isolated channel. Hopefully, the Orbi satellite uses a channel isolated from the router like any multi-AP system should.
"If a single router broadcasts 2 SSIDs on one channel then there may be performance degradation."
Can you offer an explanation or link to justification of this claim?
EDIT: I just did a quick google and realized that the management traffic is duplicated per additional SSID, but this is trivial with 802.11N speeds. (http://revolutionwifi.blogspot.com/2010/10/limit-ssids-data-rates-to-maintain.html)
But this now beggs the question: Why have a separate SSID at all? Since the cameras connect by WPS, if Netgear simply allowed the cameras to connect to any SSID, and use the router's QoS capability to managed the arlo traffic (if even necessary, since Arlo cameras have their own local storage for clips prior to transmitting to base station/cloud), then all would be solved.
