NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Wired Backhaul - Alternate Configuration
I am researching a home mesh system and Orbi is at the top of my list. In my situation, i need to to extend my wifi coverage from my current ISP modem at one end of the house (office) to my garage at...
What is the Mfr and model# of the ISP modem the NG router is connected too?
Would probably work ok in that configuration. Would you be using the Orbi in AP mode or router mode?
Thanks for your quick reply;
I will get back to you with the ISP's modem and model number (ISP is Comcast).
As to your other question, i do not know the difference between AP or router mode (very new to this stuff)
You explanation of the double NAT (not recommended) sounds complicated. I was drawn to the Orbi solution for its simplicity. i don't want to screw around with shutting off features what already work.
To maintan compatibility with the recommended solution i would have to put thye Orbo router in the office a satelite the middle of the house , and a third closer to the garage at the other end. That solutions adds a second satelite - not a budget buster was trying to avoid that.
Since it looks like i would be using Orbi for all of my wifi connections (from the office to the garage) i assume i would have to disable the ISP's wifi (there modem has a built in wifi and 4 cat5 ports, i currently use only 1 port to feed the swithch).
RP
This project raises some interesting questions. It might be worth a few minutes do to the following:
- Make a scale diagram of the building, paying attention to the location of WiFi devices that will consume a lot of bandwidth (streaming TV's, XBoxes, etc.) The closer WiFi access points are to those devices, the better they will function.
- Are there areas outside of the building which require WiFi? If the Orbi router is at one end and a satellite at the other end, for example, about half of their coverage area will be outside the building. (i.e. wasted) unless there is an outside area that needs coverage.
- Dividing 120 by 2 gives 60 feet between access points, which may be too far, even with a satellite in the middle. If the router and satellite are moved toward the middle, this will reduce the maximum distance to about 40 feet, which is much more "do-able". i.e. wall - 40ft - router - 40ft - satellite - 40 feet - wall. With the RBK53 package (two satellites), it could be 30-30-30-30.
- The AX product can be purchased now. As FURRYe38 pointed out, there is an active community forum where people are describing their initial experiences with this new product. This is an awkward time to be investing in mesh WiFi. WiFi 6 (the AX product) is literally "brand new". Every manufacturer is rushing out products. There are only a few smartphones and laptops which are capable of WiFi 6, so the benefits will not be realized until people begin to replace products. How fast do people replace TV's, laptops, smartphones? Those thousands of 2.4G Internet of Things devices will see no benefit (maybe never). If you spend $500 on a new Orbi WiFi 5 system today, will you regret that when some new gadget needs WiFi 6? But, if you invest even more in WiFi 6 and it doesn't work well??? What a dilemma.
- Setting the Orbi to AP mode is simple. The existing router remains in control of all network address assignments. The office equipment can be reached from all parts of the house.
Good Luck
Crimp On:
Thanks for your sincere advice. My wifi needs are basic. No xBox or other toys, just the ability to have reliable phone, iPad, and laptop connectivity from the garage. As you pointed out, RBK53 vs Wifi 6 is a dilema but fortunately i have the time to sit on the side lines and let it work itself out. I will make my decision early next year. the bandwith of W6 is interesting but the price is more than i want to spend especially if i need 3 pieces.
Thanks again
RP