NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
How to manage more than one access point (WAX620 - WAX630)
Hi everyone, I'm interested to buy some APs, mixed among WAX620 and WAX630. These models have "instant mesh" feature, but I don't understand if insight subscription is required. Can I join more tha...
Hi,
i m in the same situation. I have wired 10Gb route and I need couple of AP to create wi-fi using 802.11k over wiring. And ofcourse If it would be triband 4x4 160Mhz
did u find any interesting model?
Thanks in advance
eugene_d wrote:
And ofcourse If it would be triband 4x4 160Mhz
What is the "of course" coming from - reading to much consumer wireless router marketing or still dreaming of many Gigabits over the air for one computer?
On one hand you unlikely have many (or any) 802.1ax clients to gain any performance advantage.
On the other hand do you have a need to cover that many (ideally ax capable) clients that you need to have these almost 2000 carriers on air?
Last, with spanning 160 MHz (resp 80+80 MHz bandwidth) on the limited amount of channels, you kill the ability to have multiple APs in the area or partially covering the same area. Reality today is that it's not even possible to use the 80 MHz bandwidth in partially overlapping WiFi environments. And I have not even talked about legacy APs (11n/11ax) on air at the same time.
There are reasons why there are not many such devices available in the market.
Now I'm trying WAX630, I received it yesterday. I've looked for APs from other brand, and I've found a very expensive AP that I would buy (wifi ax, tri-band, embedded wireless controller, external antennas)... But it's unavailable at all, especially in my country.
I'm using the AP without Insight and it seems very interesting. For now, I can test it with a WAX218 AP, with same SSID, and with my wifi ax devices it seems to work fine.
I'll testing it for a month, and if it's good for me I'll buy another one (or two). I'll tell you my opinion at the end of summer.- schumaku, thanks for explanation .
For me it is still out of understanding, why so expensive devices like rax200/raxe500 which can work in AP mode they dont have support for 802.11k/r/v.
Giaquo, What devices did you find? I bought a WAX630 and gave back my RAX200. And i found 1 issue with WAX 630.
I have 10Gbit internet.
Internal speed check on WAX show me 2000/2300Mbit, that is ok, cause WAX has 2.5Gbit port. And my Mikrotik catch this outgoind/incoming speed.
But when I connect my notebook over cable to WAX and another monbile device connect wirelessly to WAX, and I start speedtest simultaneously on both devices, (but 1st is on wired, 2nd is on wireless) so WAX drop speed for wirelessly connected device till 10Mbit. Wired connected notebook show 1Gbit speed. If i start speed test only on 1 device, so it is ok. wired will show 1Gbit again, and wireless will show 700/700 Mbit. But if I start simultaneously it looks like my WAN only 1Gbit, though my WAN for WAX is 2.5Gbit.
So it looks like WAX can not proceed 2 different types of connection simultaneously.
I created case in support, but
Could you please check on your side the same situaion?
It is ok if no.
Thanks in advance,
Eugene.
Nothing wrong with the WAX630 - except of this use case.
Check the Insight Managed WiFi 6 AX6000 Tri-band Multi-Gig Access Point Model WAX630 User Manual p.14 ff.
===
LAN 2 port: The LAN 2 port is a Gigabit Ethernet RJ-45 port that you can use to
connect the access point to the same switch as the LAN 1 port for a link aggregation
(LAG) connection. The switch must be capable of supporting a LAG connection,
which you must configure on the switch. For more information about setting up and
enabling a LAG on the access point, see Manage the link aggregation capability on
page 135===
The second LAN port isn't bridged even if the manual says the two ports are not configured to a LAG. Thus it does not make a proper "switch"-like port to connect other devices.
Based on your description, it looks like the (disabled?) LAG isn't properly disabled, and/or the second port isn't properly enabled as a pure bridge port, too. RaghuHR work for you 8-)
It could be useful offering the ability to use the second port as a bridge port, for example to connect a printer, a camera o the like near to the AP location.
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!
