NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
DavidVt
Sep 04, 2022Tutor
WAX620 Mesh Question
I have two WAX620's and want to set them up as mesh and both will be ethernet wired. Will they backhaul over ethernet as default, or how do I set that up.
- Sep 05, 2022
With just wired WAX6xx you don't set-up any mesh* config. Just two or more WAX6xx (or WAC5xx) on the same wired network, no mesh.
*A designation massively abused in the consumer "Mesh" network devices.
bingiebilly
Sep 27, 2022Initiate
How did you add them back in? Are they wired via ethernet or still wireless?
My limited understanding (aka happy to be corrected) is that mesh is the ability to have devices distribute/share/transfer/re-authorise the wifi signal as you move around. So on all-ethernet they are indeed in a 'mesh', just that it's not got a wifi backhaul config. But most people think of it as applying to wireless.
Each device needs to know which wifi network its 'meshing into', and how its operating therein, and that its not just an extender/repeater, because being 'mesh' means it needs both a 'backhaul' capability for devices to communicate/manage/handoff with each other as you move around, plus other wifi channels for the data txm to devices. But with ethernet the devices are basically already on the required network to do all the backhaul comms management (meshing?) they need, so the only setup they really need to know for the wifi is whether they'll have their own SSID or a distributing a common network SSID.
DavidVt thanks for your earlier response. Apologies for not replying sooner, been a bit busy but your info was in line with what i was thinking. I've tested with the satellite wifi still going alongside a new SSID for the ethernet connected netgear devices and they all seem quite happy ie. i've stopped trying to get everything onto the satellite SSID. The satellite router is quite happy to let multiple SSID's get to the internet via ethernet - I guess it just sees inet requests coming through its own closed network of the wires.
On performance I think it used to be the case that using a repeater on your wifi would halve the throughput, slowing the whole wifi network. I'd definitely seen that on older devices. Not sure if its still the case.
- H-town-KenSep 27, 2022Aspirant
Each device is connected to a switch in my rack. It is a Netgear 8-port MS510TXUP. While there are 8 ports, the first 4 appear to go up to 1Gbps, while the next 4 appear to support up to 2.5Gbps. So, I plugged the WAPs into the second 4 ports to maximize performance. But that may be unnecessary/overkill. Thoughts?
- schumakuSep 27, 2022Guru - Experienced User
For WAX620 using switch ports supporting 2.5 GbE is about right - anything is a waste of the WAX capabilities.
The MS510TXUP (assume this information is correct) have four 100M/1000M/2.5G, plus four 100M/1000M/2.5G/5G/10G, plus two MultiGig capable SFP+ slots with up 10 Gb. Similar for the MS510TXM (no PoE/PoE+/PoE++). The older MS510TX and MS510TXPP have a mix of four GbE plus four MultiGig ports.
H-town-Ken wrote:
While there are 8 ports, the first 4 appear to go up to 1Gbps, while the next 4 appear to support up to 2.5Gbps. So, I plugged the WAPs into the second 4 ports to maximize performance.
This read more like a MS510TXPP (or MS510TX and external power supplies to the WAX620). In this case, the four 2.5GbE ports are the correct choice.
- schumakuSep 27, 2022Guru - Experienced User
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!