NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
AX8 AX5700 (RAX75) Management Software freeze every day along with the AD7000 (R8900)
I bought this AX8 AX5700 (RAX75) (unfortunately, costco model is not even showing up in the dropdown...) router from Costco to replace my AD7000 (R8900)which also bought from Costco. I did the fir...
I'd deal with that pule of issues one at a time. They do not seem to be related.
Maybe other people with more expertise will be able to pick up those issues.
I'll start with this one:
Vincy wrote:
What is your idea of a Wireless Bridge?
I ask because people turn up here with different interpretations of "bridge", not helped by Netgear's own indiscriminate use of the label.
You want the R8900 to talk to wifi on the RAX75 and to pass it on to other devices?
You want to wire the R8900 to the RAX75 and act as a wifi access point?
You have been through everything in the manual for the R8900?
There is a manual for the R8900 somewhere at the end of this link:
>> Click here >> R8900 | Product | Support | NETGEAR << Click here <<
See the section Set Up the Router in Bridge Mode.
Vincy wrote:
I very much doubt if you are mistaken.
That you can't get into the graphical user interface (GUI) is a bummer. What sits at the front of the network? The modem?
Thanks Michael for your response. About the duplicate of post that is honestly not my fault. Even after selecting the right options from dropdowns, Netgear put my post in wrong place which I do not what is what until someone said, you better off posting this on WiFi 6 blog. I am in IT industry since 90s and when i design a website I do not make user to guess where the user should be but design such a way, based on the selections I take them to the right place. That is called "User Friendly!" I think, Netgear never heard of it, unfortunately!
Anyway, please see my responses in red:
What is your idea of a Wireless Bridge?
All the devices, nowadays, come with both LAN port and built-in wireless, however, built-in wireless have bandwidth limitations. But, all the LAN ports have Gigabit through put. Therefore, I use my old routers as Wireless Bridge to bridge two routers wirelessly and use the LAN ports to connect my device with either Cat 5E or Cat 7 cables where I see more than double throughput. I have R6300 and R7000 bridged for serveral years and they both serve me flawlessly. But, the problem is with latest and greatest devices from Netgear which are not tested thorougly in my opinion and based on the response I have seen from the support people.
I ask because people turn up here with different interpretations of "bridge", not helped by Netgear's own indiscriminate use of the label.
I explained it above...
You want the R8900 to talk to wifi on the RAX75 and to pass it on to other devices?
Yes, on LAN ports wired.
You want to wire the R8900 to the RAX75 and act as a wifi access point?
No, They are at least 50ft away from each other. RAX75 is on upper floor in the guest bedroom and the R8900 is in main floor in the living room. From the same distance, when I upgraded R6300 to R7000, I bridged the R6300 to R7000 and when I upgraded R7000 to R8900, I bridged R7000 to R8900 and had no problems. I also bridged R6300 from my Master Bedroom to R8900 and now RAX75 and see no issues. I took my R8900 down yesterday, put my R7000 on main floor again and so far I have not seen freeze. If this continues then I can tell for sure that R8900 and RAX75 are not compatible to bridge them wirelessly but will have to wait next few days to come to that conclusion. If that is the case then its a bummer!
As per Netgear, if I understand it correctly, when you wirelessly bridge the two routers, it will also link them and I assume it works like a Access point based on the wireless device that is on the network. NOT SURE! But, this is what the manual says but I do not care this feature at all and my intention is to make use of gigabit LAN ports:
You can use your router in bridge mode to connect multiple devices wirelessly at the faster 802.11ac speed. You need two routers: one set up as a router and the other set up as a bridge.
Installing your router as a bridge offers the following benefits:
Take advantage of gigabit WiFi speeds on current devices
Use Gigabit WiFi for applications like video and gaming.
Connect multiple devices like NAS, Smart TV, Blu-ray player, and game consoles at gigabit WiFi speeds using a WiFi link. (not sure what this means)
Avoid the need for separate WiFi adapters for each device.
You have been through everything in the manual for the R8900?
There is nothing special to configure for what I am doing in any of those three routers, all the steps remained same for my purpose. Whatever additional feature R8900 has it, I am not using them, so it does not matter to me. Yes, I have went through all the instructions from Netgear!
Also, about the Management software, you cannot rely on Netgear! There is a day and night difference between, R8900 and RAX75 software.
No, I don't have anything in front of the RAX75 but behind it has AT&T as the Gigabit Modem and router which supplies internet connection to RAX75. It is not like anythng else is interfering with the router becasue in the end, I am not new to what i am doing here. I am doing this for at least 5 years if not more. Like, I said, the problems started as I start adding devices around the house. Their firmware as not sophisticated enough to handle many devices and whatever database they have in the firmware it totally useless and that is why you see different statistics about the connected devices from difference interfaces to its Management Portal. I showed them to the support but they had no answers, I don't even think that they convey these bugs to the engineers, to be honest! They just want to bring the new technology to the market to make money as much as possible. I was married to DLink before i tried R6300 from Netgear. Only, DLink and Netgear has better User Inface for the Management Software. I rate DLink number one in that perspective, the last rounter i used was DIR-825 and i still have it and use it as a switch by putting DD-WRT firmware in it. But the sad part of DLink is they have fallen behind the technology and that why I had to switch Netgear but loved the R6300 and R7000 and still use them.
Alright, Netgear removed my font color after submitting my last response except for one little thing! WYSWYG does not play here! LOL! it is WYSNWYG!
Vincy wrote:
Thanks Michael for your response. About the duplicate of post that is honestly not my fault. Even after selecting the right options from dropdowns, Netgear put my post in wrong place which I do not what is what until someone said, you better off posting this on WiFi 6 blog.
Believe me, no one is accusing you of crimes against humanity for the misplaced post. It happens all the time and is a natural consequence of the rat's nest that Netgear has created in this community.
Forgive me if you thought I was complaining. I just wanted to avoid duplicated efforts.
The "dropdown" thing is a part of the problem. You have to start in the right place before your hardware is available in the dropdown. Sadly, if you start somewhere else and pick the right device in the wrong section, which can happen such is the inconsistency of this place, the board does not move posts to the right area.
Then there is the problem that not all models appear in the drop down, especially different hardware version or, as in your case, stuff that may be too new to have reached the database.
Get the picture? Confused? Me too, and I am a regular.
This mess is one reason why, unlike some people, I do not suggest that people post in "the right section". That just leads to duplicates that can confuse everyone. Instead, I suggest looking in the right place for similar messages and ask the Netgear moderators to move misplaced messages.
As to your long saga, let's pick up this bit:
Vincy wrote:
What is your idea of a Wireless Bridge?
All the devices, nowadays, come with both LAN port and built-in wireless, however, built-in wireless have bandwidth limitations. But, all the LAN ports have Gigabit through put. Therefore, I use my old routers as Wireless Bridge to bridge two routers wirelessly and use the LAN ports to connect my device with either Cat 5E or Cat 7 cables where I see more than double throughput. I have R6300 and R7000 bridged for serveral years and they both serve me flawlessly. But, the problem is with latest and greatest devices from Netgear which are not tested thorougly in my opinion and based on the response I have seen from the support people.
Wireless bridge is also known as repeater mode in some documentation, or even "WDS" (Wireless Distribution System).
That's why I asked for clarification. Not everyone uses the right labels.
Vincy wrote:
Also, about the Management software, you cannot rely on Netgear! There is a day and night difference between, R8900 and RAX75 software.
Not sure what you mean by that. The apps for control with mobile devices are the same.
The graphical user interface (GUI) will also be pretty common, but with firmware modifications to match the hardware. Even the Orbi and Nighthawk ranges have the same basic approach, just tailored for the hardware.
The R8900 and RAX75 firmware are different, which is why you see different things. The software, your browser or the desktop and mobile apps, really just gives you access to the devices.
The day and night difference between the R8900 and RAX75 is in the firmware.
Vincy wrote:
No, I don't have anything in front of the RAX75 but behind it has AT&T as the Gigabit Modem and router which supplies internet connection to RAX75.
The AT&T Gigabit Modem and router mean that you run the risk of the dreaded "double NAT".
Two routers on your network can cause headaches. For example, you can end up with local address problems. Among other things, the other router can misdirect addresses that the Netgear router usually handles, such as routerlogin.net or the usual IP address for a router, 192.168.1.1.
This explains some of the other drawbacks.
What is Double NAT? | Answer | NETGEAR Support
Unless you have specific reasons for using two routers – to create two separate networks for example – it is often easier to use just one router and then to set up the second router as a wifi access point. Netgear advises this, as does just about every site you will visit.
It may be possible to put the modem/router into modem only (bridge) mode and then to use the second device as the router. But some Internet service providers, such as BT in the UK, supply modem/routers that won't work in bridge mode. There may be ways to get the modem/router to cooperate, but sometimes it is easier to put the second router into AP mode. But that has its own drawbacks:
Disabled Features on the Router when set to AP Mode | Answer | NETGEAR SupportMichael, once again thanks for your response.
However, you're going off road here. Whatever you're telling me is irrelevant here because I am not a novice user! I use two routers with totally different configurations for my own purpose and that is not the question here. Like I said, I am not new to networking and I have been in IT industry since 90s. I have also tried daisy chaining routers for some time but did not like the setup the way I wanted.
However, my real question in this forum was to see if anyone else also encountered the problem I am facing. Which is not able to access the Management software by routerlogin.net or routerlogin.com or routers ip address or using Netgears Apps like Nighthawk or Genie. Not being able to access the router has nothing to do with double NAT or anything else. I am not talking about connecting to the network here. There is a webserver on every router which gives you access to the router, so that one can manage the router as well as control the connected devices. I could not connect to it regardless of the interface, wired or wireless. The Double NAT creates conflict only when you have same network configurations but, in my case, I am not that beginner. I never use default configuration; I use my own set of IP configurations on different subnets.
Trust me, I use this configuration since I switched to AT&T from Comcast in 2015 or so, with R7000 and had no problems.