NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Retired_Member
Jun 17, 2020RAX40 Firmware 1.0.3.80 Crash/Bug Log
Hello folks, can everyone please log all the issues they are experiencing with the RAX40 router on 1.0.3.80 firmware under this thread, I see there are several threads going on about the issue, figur...
itsmehuey
Dec 07, 2020Luminary
Retired_Member wrote:
itsmehuey
So Netgear countered my v2 replacement request with a "we have a new beta for you to test" statement today. Told them this is the last beta I'm testing. I want the v2, it's clear to me that v2 is a fix for what they learned from RAX40.
that's so pathetic... keep pushing them and keep us updated.
Retired_Member
Dec 09, 2020Oh, what a surprise, the final beta that I am given to test is the .88 available publicly. I did a WinMerge comparison, the file I downloaded from Netgear Support and the file the customer service rep who has been supplying me with beta firmware linked to are IDENTICAL. Indeed, they are trying to run the clock out. There is got to be a place where we can complain about this shady practice, such as BBB or something! I am fed up with this. This is a defective product since they don't have a working firmware for it. I am going to try to return it.
- Eagle-TwoDec 09, 2020Apprentice
Has there been confirmation that connection issues were resolved with the V2 routers?
- grumpyolman22Dec 09, 2020Star
Each time I have posted the contact info for the responsible Netgear executive, the post has been deleted by a ghost moderator.
- itsmehueyDec 10, 2020Luminary
Retired_Member wrote:Oh, what a surprise, the final beta that I am given to test is the .88 available publicly. I did a WinMerge comparison, the file I downloaded from Netgear Support and the file the customer service rep who has been supplying me with beta firmware linked to are IDENTICAL. Indeed, they are trying to run the clock out. There is got to be a place where we can complain about this shady practice, such as BBB or something! I am fed up with this. This is a defective product since they don't have a working firmware for it. I am going to try to return it.
WHAT?? Are you serious?! they basically gave the final beta release candidate that they released as .88 to the public?! So that one also doesn't support AX, OFDMA, WPA3 and smart connect either? They went completely backwards since the .83 beta that I am on.
- itsmehueyDec 11, 2020Luminary
anyone who has the .88 firmware installed able to test readyshare (smb specifically) with a 12 or 14tb external hdd?
- Retired_MemberDec 12, 2020
The external drive I have connectected is only half a TB so not sure, this one works however.
The customer service rep told me that engineers said to test .88 and if .88 is stable that they will build the OFDMA, WPA3 and SmartConnect into .88 I am not buying it but she told me not to worry if all else fails they will decide if they will replace the hardware! I have a feeling I will be moving to an ASUS router next summer
- Retired_MemberDec 15, 2020Netgear contacted me today and offered a replacement for my RAX40. They want to give me a RAX43. I guess I'll take it as long as it's not someone's hand-me-down.
- itsmehueyDec 15, 2020Luminary
Retired_Member wrote:
Netgear contacted me today and offered a replacement for my RAX40. They want to give me a RAX43. I guess I'll take it as long as it's not someone's hand-me-down.thats great, they should replace EVERYONE'S! the rax43 is actually the replacement for the rax40. rax40 has been removed from the netgear product website
- itsmehueyDec 15, 2020Luminary
i've contacted netgear in follow-on from my current case i have open with them regarding internal 500 errors and readyshare not working properly, to see if they will replace mine with a rax43. they should replace everyones as the rax40 is a defective piece of garbage as seen throughout these forum threads.
- Retired_MemberDec 16, 2020
Guys,
So Netgear processed an RMA for my RAX40. Well, check out this statement in the RMA instructions;
Once the defective unit is received by NETGEAR, a replacement unit will be sent to you.
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME. In the middle of the pandemic, and holiday season, when we work from home, we are going to sit and wait for days for a router, with no Wifi at home. I AM DONE! DONE AND DONE. Most companies ship replacements first so that there is no interruption in service. I want my money back. I AM NEVER buying another Netgear product again!
- NewfiedroolDec 16, 2020Virtuoso
They normally offer 3 ways. 2 ways where they send you a router but hold your card details for normal and next day delivery and the other option is you send in your router and on receipt they send out one.
that's how my XR router was replaced earlie this year.Did they offer you this?
- Retired_MemberDec 16, 2020
The two other ways they charge you. I don't need expedited shipping but I need the router first. This is not something I caused and I should not spend a dime for this to be taken care of. The only "free" way is that you have to send the router in first. I just dealt with Kwikset company on a zigbee deadbolt. They sent me two units over time and each time I got a shipping label. Someone, please, inform me if I am being unreasonable. Paid 249.99 for this thing last year.
- NewfiedroolDec 16, 2020Virtuoso
In the U.K. we can claim back postage from the original retailer. Is this not the same in the US?
- Retired_MemberDec 16, 2020
No, it doesn't look like they do that.
You selected the Standard Swap Exchange Contract:
- You are responsible for the freight charges of shipping the defective unit to NETGEAR.
- Please send the defective product to our RMA fulfillment center
NETGEAR Returns
3605 Knight Road Suite 101
Memphis
TN 38118- We suggest using a carrier that provides tracking information.
- NETGEAR is not responsible for packages lost in transit to NETGEAR.
- Once the defective unit is received by NETGEAR, a replacement unit will be sent to you. The shipping charges for sending the replacement to you will be covered by NETGEAR.