NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
RSchwein
Mar 21, 2011Aspirant
WNDAP350's are constantly rebooting
WNDAP350 significant problems
I have 5 of these on various network segments over a large geographical area. All are using different wiring, different network switches, nothing in common with any of them except one thing. All are experiencing exactly the same problem.
Log excerpt
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: Network Integrality: Ping Failed
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: Network Integrality: Host: 10.110.255.254 is down.Bringing down all the vaps
Mar 21 11:41:51 kernel: brtrunk: port 2(wifi0vap0) entering disabled state
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: wifi0vap0: STA 00:1b:63:cc:f5:40 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: wifi0vap0: STA 00:26:4a:c1:51:26 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Here is what I've learned:
When there are no associations at all (over a weekend for example) there are no problems; pings are always successful.
After there are a couple (two or so) associations then the above occurs maybe about once every 4 hours. You start getting more associations then the “Ping Failed” occurs more frequently. On one where there are about 30 associations the failure occurs about every 20 minutes, sometimes more frequently.
I am aware that these 350s ping their respective default gateways. Examination of the router's respective logs show the routers are working flawlessly. Indeed, everyone “wired” on the various network segments are not having any problems. Each 350 has it's own Gig/sec connection. Measured network traffic is rarely over 3% of available capacity.
So, in the 350's firmware, is it waiting a shorter and shorter amount of time for a ping return as the number of associations increase? Therefore, it is timing out waiting for the return when if it would wait just a little longer it would be satisfied?
I've got to solve this problem before I can deploy anymore 350s. I'm not replacing anymore WAP54G's which are working just fine.
Thanks for any help here.
Bob
I have 5 of these on various network segments over a large geographical area. All are using different wiring, different network switches, nothing in common with any of them except one thing. All are experiencing exactly the same problem.
Log excerpt
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: Network Integrality: Ping Failed
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: Network Integrality: Host: 10.110.255.254 is down.Bringing down all the vaps
Mar 21 11:41:51 kernel: brtrunk: port 2(wifi0vap0) entering disabled state
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: wifi0vap0: STA 00:1b:63:cc:f5:40 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: wifi0vap0: STA 00:26:4a:c1:51:26 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Here is what I've learned:
When there are no associations at all (over a weekend for example) there are no problems; pings are always successful.
After there are a couple (two or so) associations then the above occurs maybe about once every 4 hours. You start getting more associations then the “Ping Failed” occurs more frequently. On one where there are about 30 associations the failure occurs about every 20 minutes, sometimes more frequently.
I am aware that these 350s ping their respective default gateways. Examination of the router's respective logs show the routers are working flawlessly. Indeed, everyone “wired” on the various network segments are not having any problems. Each 350 has it's own Gig/sec connection. Measured network traffic is rarely over 3% of available capacity.
So, in the 350's firmware, is it waiting a shorter and shorter amount of time for a ping return as the number of associations increase? Therefore, it is timing out waiting for the return when if it would wait just a little longer it would be satisfied?
I've got to solve this problem before I can deploy anymore 350s. I'm not replacing anymore WAP54G's which are working just fine.
Thanks for any help here.
Bob
45 Replies
- RSchweinAspirantI admit to beginning to become a little concerned with the talent level of Netgear's software coders. I literally had to do all the work (packet traces, logs, etc.) before they would even admit there was a problem. Even then it took the intervention of Netgear's local sales rep. to get them to act. v2.0.18 was their answer but, I still don't see it on the public download page of the WNDAP350. Bob
- GlithAspirantNo issues with your 2.0.18? In that maybe you could send it to me?
- RSchweinAspirantI'm having no issues with 2.0.18 but, I'm not doing anything fancy with them. They are set to a static channel, no VLAN's or QOS settings configured. Rouge WAP detection seems to be working fine. Where would you like me to Email a copy of 2.0.18? Bob
- GlithAspirantI sent you a PM. =)
- MoselAspirantWould you kindly please provide me the link for 2.0.18? Thank you.
- XTedAspirantI was being to thinking that I was the only one with 4 access points with similar problems with lockouts, dropped connections and no connections at all! Was almost at the point of finding a replacement but a new firmware may solve some of the problems!
Bob / Schwein - I have sent you a PM :) - tcdrakeAspirantI could use this firmware update too. I will PM you.
- XTedAspirantSo did anyone manage to get a copy of the beta firmware?
- Daedalus01AspirantPer Netgears regulations, your not supposed to email other people beta firmwares. For one, if only one person mentions a problem and 200 don't, they won't know about a problem. The more people report a problem, the better they know how software is working.
- Mr_PlopAspirantOh great. I have just installed a WNDAP350 at a client site. Simple config with two SSIDs (on the same VLAN).
I was connected to the 2nd SSID and when about 5-10 other wireless devices connected the wireless access suddenly froze (sort of). My laptop (Vista) was reporting only Local access, but nothing local was accessible.
Strangely, I was able to connect via the other SSID and managed to re-boot the WNDAP350 which fixed the problem. From the sounds of everyone's experience, this fix is temporary!
Is this similar to the issues that y'all are experiencing? I hope they release the firmware fix soon. The customer is spitting chips as I have already had to remove a UTM50 that was causing browsers to hang when accessing HTTPS sites... (but that is a story for another forum...).
It is ridiculous that users are experiencing these problems and then have to provide all the evidence to support to to get anything done...
Maybe I should just switch to another more reliable brand? (If one exists.)