NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

teddy_c's avatar
teddy_c
Aspirant
Dec 01, 2020
Solved

Nighthawk X6 R8000

I was trying to set up a ssh server that is able to allow me to access it remotely. First, I did port forwarding for my server that has a static address:192.168.1.6.             Above is ...
  • antinode's avatar
    antinode
    Dec 02, 2020

    > [...] so if you guys cannot see pictures that I posted, I won't post
    > anymore.

     

       Your port-forwarding rule is now visible.  I doubt that it's correct.
    Why two ports ("1000-1001") for SSH?  Why an internal port other than
    22?

     

    > [...] I assigned an static IP address for it in my router [...]

     

       Terminology: A "static" address is configured on the device itself.
    What you configure on a (DHCP server on a) router is a reserved dynamic
    address, not a static address.  Either one should fix the address of a
    device, but some implications are different.

     

    > [...] I've turned on the 'Remote Login' in 'Sharing' setting and
    > allowed 'All users' to access.

     

       Not related.  I'd disable it, unless you _really_ want it enabled.


    > [...] I just tried to enter 'ssh <myserver_name>@119.74.57.xxx -p
    > <port_of_my_server>' [...]

     

       I don't care if you hide some of your external/public IP address
    ("xxx"), but "-p <port_of_my_server>" is a waste of everyone's time.
    What is it?  "-p 22"?  "-p 1000"?  "-p 1001"?  Other?

     

       You've already showed your port numbers.  Which part of "actual
    actions (commands)" was unclear?

     

    > [...] "ssh: connect to host 119.74.57.xxx port xxxx: Connection
    > refused"

     

       I'd expect that.  Almost certainly, your SSH server is listening on
    port 22, not anything in the range "1000-1001".  When you try to talk to
    port 1000 (or 1001) on your router, then, with that port-forwarding
    rule, the router will forward that message to port 1000 (or 1001) at
    "192.168.1.6", where no one is listening.


    > >       https://community.netgear.com/t5/x/x/m-p/1859106
    >
    >    Did you do any of the tests there?  Answer any more questions?

     

       Still wondering.  Another thread which goes through the same set of
    "usual problems", and includes an example of a better port-forwarding
    rule for SSH:

     

          https://community.netgear.com/t5/x/x/m-p/1836366

     

       (Note: External port "2022" is not required.  Internal port "22" _is_
    required, if your SSH server is listening at that port, which is very
    likely.)