AFP Out Of Date In OS X Lion

jocala wrote:
Yes it does. You can't fork GPL software, then distribute the fork as closed-source.

So what exactly is your point? They didn't fork their own code, they just put it under a new license. Which they can do anytime they please and which has happened with other (formerly) open source projects, too.

jocala wrote:
If they distribute binaries, anyone to whom they distribute is legally entitled to a copy of source.

Wrong, see above.

jocala wrote:
They can freely charge for their distribution costs, only offer source on cd, etc. But they must offer source.

Wrong again, see above.

jocala wrote:
Furthermore, once a "licensee" obtains a copy of source, they can legally redistribute it as well.

Again: wrong. See above.

jocala wrote:
Bottom line, does a compile of 2.2-beta4 using the proper toolchain fix things for ReadyNAS Duo users?

Depends on the things I'd say.

-Stefan