NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
drhiii
Feb 26, 2013Aspirant
NV+ RAID Questions
I have poured over docs and posts but I just want to be double triple sure before embarking so am asking a redundant question I know... apologizies.
I have an NV+. 2 drives running in bays 1 and 2, X-RAID. Everything working A-ok.
However, I would like to reconfigure the device to do the following:
Would like bays 1 and 2 to be RAIDed, mirrored. Would like to know that if one drive fails, the other will maintain file integrity, meaning it will keep going until the failed drive is replaced.
Would like to run bays 3 and 4 independently, meaning 1+2 tied together, and 3 and 4 operating independently which essentially makes for 3 drives. (looking to have 1 and 2 as 1TB drive, and the other two drives being either 750s or 2TBs, not sure yet).
This possible with I believe is RAID1 for 1 and 2? Or, not? If not, would I need to bind 1+2, then 3+4?
Or, can someone steer me right?
Note: I know I have to pull off all current data and install the NV+ from factory reset to change from X-RAID to Flex.
tx
I have an NV+. 2 drives running in bays 1 and 2, X-RAID. Everything working A-ok.
However, I would like to reconfigure the device to do the following:
Would like bays 1 and 2 to be RAIDed, mirrored. Would like to know that if one drive fails, the other will maintain file integrity, meaning it will keep going until the failed drive is replaced.
Would like to run bays 3 and 4 independently, meaning 1+2 tied together, and 3 and 4 operating independently which essentially makes for 3 drives. (looking to have 1 and 2 as 1TB drive, and the other two drives being either 750s or 2TBs, not sure yet).
This possible with I believe is RAID1 for 1 and 2? Or, not? If not, would I need to bind 1+2, then 3+4?
Or, can someone steer me right?
Note: I know I have to pull off all current data and install the NV+ from factory reset to change from X-RAID to Flex.
tx
12 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- StephenBGuru - Experienced UserWell, "best use" depends on what you are trying to do.
If the goal is to maximize space, then use flexraid, and put a volume on each disk. That will give you 6 TB of space with no redundancy.
If you want maximum protection against failure, then you'd also want flexraid, putting the 2x2TB drives into a 2 TB RAID-1 volume, and the 2x1TB drives into a second 1 TB RAID-1 volume. That would give you 3 TB of space. (Though even with max protection, you need to have a backup!)
Your original proposal is reasonable and splits the difference. A 2 TB redundant RAID-1 volume, and two non-redundant 1 TB volumes. That gives you 4 TB of space. You can put the more critical data on the redundant volume. - drhiiiAspirantThank you for the speedy reply, again. And I have to say, I've been exactly what I DETEST in posters which is.... whiney... about trying to understand and solve this quandary. So I am grateful for your remarkably even tempered-ness when I doubt I would have been nearly so, moderate, in replies.
Having said that... I will say with the current two 2tb configuration and will now try to figure out how to add the 3rd 1tb drive and configure it, then the 4th 1tb drive. I do want redundancy for the two 2tb drives. And if it came to it, I'd just leave it that way. But seeing I can have the 3rd and 4th drives separate volumes, non redundant, that is what I am striving for.
I plugged in the 3rd 1tb device last eve and the NAS sat there for several minutes with reporting anything so I thought I'd mucked up the works, and unplugged it. But will give it a go again this eve. I followed the instructions to a T but didn't see the device show up in the Volumes screen to proceed, but am guessing I did not wait long enough?
Anywayz... I appreciate your replies. Am usually at all whiny about asking for online help but this stuff has worked on my nerves a bit and, well... I'll snap out of it. You are owed beers of some sort methinks.
txStephenB wrote: Well, "best use" depends on what you are trying to do.
If the goal is to maximize space, then use flexraid, and put a volume on each disk. That will give you 6 TB of space with no redundancy.
If you want maximum protection against failure, then you'd also want flexraid, putting the 2x2TB drives into a 2 TB RAID-1 volume, and the 2x1TB drives into a second 1 TB RAID-1 volume. That would give you 3 TB of space. (Though even with max protection, you need to have a backup!)
Your original proposal is reasonable and splits the difference. A 2 TB redundant RAID-1 volume, and two non-redundant 1 TB volumes. That gives you 4 TB of space. You can put the more critical data on the redundant volume.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!