Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
SRXN3205 and static routes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-07-18
05:01 PM
2011-07-18
05:01 PM
SRXN3205 and static routes
Good People:
I'm using an SRXN3205 behind a motorola cable modem bridge. My ISP has given me one static IP, and two dynamic IPs. I need the static IP for the VPN router (FVS114) that my company has supplied to me, and I'm letting the 3205 pick up one of the dynamic IPs.
Essentially (pls ignore the actual numbers), my dynamic IP is (say) 74.1.2.3, and I'm using the 192.168.200.x subnet behind it, with the 3205 at 192.168.200.1. All of that is goodness and light, working fine.
The static IP they gave me was 68.4.5.6, not even close to the same subnet. OK, i thought, I'll just pop in a static IP address, and all will be fine. (A fixed 1-1 NAT would have worked as well, but it doesn't look like I can do that with the 3205).
So I tried setting a route:
Active
dest: 68.4.5.6
Mask: 255.255.255.255
Inf: LAN
GW: 192.168.200.1
Needless to say, it isn't working.
If I set the GW to 68.4.5.6, I get a cryptic "Command Error".
I'm assuming that interface means the port that is connected to the destination device (in this case it's hanging off the LAN). I would have throught that the GW would have been 68.4.5.6, since there is a direct connection to the VPN gateway box.
Can someone help clarify this for me?
Thanks!
I'm using an SRXN3205 behind a motorola cable modem bridge. My ISP has given me one static IP, and two dynamic IPs. I need the static IP for the VPN router (FVS114) that my company has supplied to me, and I'm letting the 3205 pick up one of the dynamic IPs.
Essentially (pls ignore the actual numbers), my dynamic IP is (say) 74.1.2.3, and I'm using the 192.168.200.x subnet behind it, with the 3205 at 192.168.200.1. All of that is goodness and light, working fine.
The static IP they gave me was 68.4.5.6, not even close to the same subnet. OK, i thought, I'll just pop in a static IP address, and all will be fine. (A fixed 1-1 NAT would have worked as well, but it doesn't look like I can do that with the 3205).
So I tried setting a route:
Active
dest: 68.4.5.6
Mask: 255.255.255.255
Inf: LAN
GW: 192.168.200.1
Needless to say, it isn't working.
If I set the GW to 68.4.5.6, I get a cryptic "Command Error".
I'm assuming that interface means the port that is connected to the destination device (in this case it's hanging off the LAN). I would have throught that the GW would have been 68.4.5.6, since there is a direct connection to the VPN gateway box.
Can someone help clarify this for me?
Thanks!
Message 1 of 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-07-18
05:45 PM
2011-07-18
05:45 PM
Re: SRXN3205 and static routes
I would use inbound rules with ANY to specific IP for FVS will be used , you will able to assign wan IP in the inbound rules
or classical routing but I don't think you want that under WAN section of the router
or classical routing but I don't think you want that under WAN section of the router
Message 2 of 2