Submitted on
2020-07-05
11:51 PM
Submitted by
jeroendevos
on
2020-07-05
11:51 PM
Feature Request, i allready spoken to the support team of netgear if its possible to set the fan speed in the M4300 , this is because the switches are installed in a House, Maybe anybody a solution of the developer team? Kind Regards,
... View more
Would you please allow the WAC720 access points to be usable on Insight? Without Insight compatibility, impending discontinuation of Business Central will remove cloud management functionality from these devices that were purchased only 1 year ago. Thank you in advance!
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
New Idea
Submitted on
2021-02-22
01:37 PM
Submitted by
IrishCornelius
on
2021-02-22
01:37 PM
Please add support for TLS 1.2 to GS108Tv2 switch range. Currently only TLS 1.0 is supported on firmware 5.4.2.35. TLS 1.0 is considered deprecated by IETF: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-12 <extract> 4. Do Not Use TLSv1.0 TLSv1.0 MUST NOT be used. Negotiation of TLSv1.0 from any version of TLS MUST NOT be permitted. Any other version of TLS is more secure than TLSv1.0. TLSv1.0 can be configured to prevent interception, though using the highest version available is preferable. Pragmatically, clients MUST NOT send a ClientHello with ClientHello.client_version set to {03,01}. Similarly, servers MUST NOT send a ServerHello with ServerHello.server_version set to {03,01}. Any party receiving a Hello message with the protocol version set to {03,01} MUST respond with a "protocol_version" alert message and close the connection. Historically, TLS specifications were not clear on what the record layer version number (TLSPlaintext.version) could contain when sending ClientHello. Appendix E of [RFC5246] notes that TLSPlaintext.version could be selected to maximize interoperability, though no definitive value is identified as ideal. That guidance is still applicable; therefore, TLS servers MUST accept any value {03,XX} (including {03,00}) as the record layer version number for ClientHello, but they MUST NOT negotiate TLSv1.0. </extract>
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Hi, Please add SNMP support on the GC510PP, to monitor this device. Smaller devices do have SNMP support, but this more expensive model does not have SNMP support. I think SNMP support for managed switches is a MUST have, since they are used in "enterprice". Kind regards, Tim
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Hi,
is great to have the possibility to configure the VLAN management interface.
Thx!
Claudio
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
New Idea
Submitted on
2018-08-03
04:59 AM
Submitted by
sasha-london
on
2018-08-03
04:59 AM
Hi
I'm aware of the previous discusions/sugestions here about adding the ability to specify a managemet vlan on ProSAFE Plus lineup (e.g.GS108Ev3). While there are good alternatives higher up the line that do support this (GS108Ev3->GS108Tv2) I dont see a similar aternative for GS105PE - a-5 port passthrough POE switch. It would really be appreciated if this feature could be added to GS105PE. I think it would make the switch so much better. It does almost everything needed for this type of device - just lacking the management vlan.
Thanks,
Sasha
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
I'm actually using an SRX 5308 router, which is tagged as EoL product. As there is no replacement for this router in Netgear catalog, I was wondering if a minimal firmware update implmenting TLS 1.2 (which is the minimum request for modern browsers) would be possible. So we could continue using the router and, first of all, connecting to managmenet interface via browser. Thanks in advance Luciano
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
New Idea
Submitted on
2020-12-27
11:19 PM
Submitted by
nismo9132_net
on
2020-12-27
11:19 PM
I purchased both a GS305E and two GS308E switches and really like the performance and configuration functionality, but it's missing a key feature -a Configurable Management VLAN. Please add this feature because otherwise I'm likely going to return these switches to get something that supports them from another vendor for the same price point.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
I have two requests, 1) Being the most important and 2) being less important. 1) Per attached device real-time bandwidth monitor. Consider the scenario that a connect device is utilising too much bandwidth and slowing other users. You can’t easily identify the culprit at present. 2) Historical bandwidth and traffic stats, per attached device. Allowing you to identify large upload and downloads, etc., and View usage patterns. Thanks for the consideration.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
As the core of LAN, L3 switch really needs DHCP reservation, which is indispensable. It's well-known that switch is the most stable hardware in network. It's more likely for a bare-metal server goes down than a switch does. If M4300 has DHCP reservation feature, we can transfer the DHCP server from a PC to the switch, which could enhance the stability and convenience for management of the network significantly. At present, in "System-Services-DHCP Pool Configuration", I have to create ONE "manual_pool" for EACH MAC-IP mapping. It's REALLY tedious and boring. I think you can add at least two features to improve the situation. 1. Re-design "System-Services-DHCP Pool Configuration-Type of binding-manual" in the web-gui, and allow people to add multiple MAC-IP-GATEWAY-DNS-NETBIOS mappings to one 'manual_pool'. For example: https://i.loli.net/2020/04/03/lotb2NgSHzwpqIL.png In this way, users can easily add or remove records by clicking the '+' or '-' button ahead of each line. 2. Add a new command to load an external text-based datebase which contains all the information stated above from a USB flash drive or tftp server. In this way, users can create and modify the text-based database using their favorite text-editor and then upload it to the switch. It would be great if the developers can add the features I stated above to M4300. Thanks a lot.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
It would be great to drill down on the daily Content Filtering Report, to see which connected clients tried to visit blocked sites. It would also be nice to offer parental controls for the device or connected client browsing history. The system is amazaing however it needs some additional features to be a reasonable solution for a work from home user with children.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
The GS110TP supports only a max SSL key length of 2048 bits. This is a real problem for modern PKI infrastructures where - at least - the CAs almost always use a 4096 bit key length.
Given that the GS110TP is still sold today I hope hat this could be corrected in a (near) future firmware update.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Please release an updated firmware with TLS 1.2/1.3 support, and the option to disable 1.0 and 1.1.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Please consider using HTTPS for the web management of the GS1xxE line of switches.
Especially the smaller models need a secure way to configure them as there are no real replacements for in-field deployments outside special technical rooms where is no room to fit an entire rack into...
As the current state of security of many of the embedded or IoT thingis is sub-optimal it is crucial to prevent login credential sniffing via other pOwnd network devices within the same subnet.
Thanks,
Stefan Seide
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Submitted on
2021-09-04
05:31 AM
Submitted by
speedman
on
2021-09-04
05:31 AM
Hi, I know that the question was allreay asked, but I HAVE to use a local mangement mode, and I wanna use fast roaming. I have a 3 floor house, with a very big garden, so I have 4 APs: - 2 WAX610 (AX1800) - 1 HPe E-MSM460 (J9590) - 1 outdoor EnGenius ENH1750EXT Both EnGenius and HPe support fast roaming. Could we excpect to have this fonction implemented in local management mode? or NetGear will force to use cloud? Thank you! Cheers, Serguei
... View more
Currently (and historically) Netgear does not always show all connected devices. This leads to a loss of user confidence in the web interface and app's ability to reflect the current state. Example- my currently connected NAS is not listed in the Attached Devices even though I previously reserved an IP address for it under Advanced -> LAN Setup. (The NAS indeed is using this reserved address.) The NAS is a wired and active connection but is only visible under Advanced->Access Control-> "View list of allowed devices not currently connected to the network". Notes- 1) other active devices are also listed as inactive. 2) normally Access Control is not implemented - this is the only visibility to devices known to be active. Use case- provide more aggressive active device polling.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
I have a Orbi pro sxk80 but can’t seem to find where to schedule one of the ssid to switch off at night and turn on in the morning. Help!!
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
It is absurd that the GS110EMX does not support https. How can this be? It’s irresponsible to have any device not support https. Please add https support to the GS110EMX. I do not want to send my device password in plaintext across my network!
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
New Idea
Submitted on
2021-07-07
02:57 PM
Submitted by
tim-homeconnect
on
2021-07-07
02:57 PM
We are looking to use manage accounts for households using Insight and the Orbi Pro. Right now, the Insight portal needs some help. Here are some things I wish it could do: Allow you to rename clients so they are identified easier Only the Router shows up in devices and not the satellite so if someone unplugs the satellite, you don't get any kind of a notification. No way to set up port forwarding remotely. Have to use the local orbilogin.net and be onsite If you make a change using the cloud, there is nothing that tells you that config is being pushed to the devices. They should have a status like "configuring" or something... You just have to wait and hope the the command worked. I will say that the portal and app make it very hard to find information. Like notifications being under Account Management? That is very un-intuative. Other than these things and the delay of using the cloud, I think it is a good solution. It just needs some work.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Please allow SNMP monitoring on ports when these are changed to stacking uplink interface mode. Monitoring systems such as Zabbix, really any SNMP based monitoring, currently isn't able to notify when ports change operational status or contribute to bandwidth pattern analysis (eg identifying a faulty SFP+ or damaged cable). I initially logged this as a bug over two years ago, sad not to see this having been implemented yet, although I never did remember to request this... My original support query, where I was told that this would need to be a feature request: https://community.netgear.com/t5/Managed-Switches/Netgear-M4300-Spine-and-Leaf/m-p/1668669#M6906 PS: The 1 hour forum posting limit is *REALLY* annoying. Please consider possibly making the time penalty 10 minutes or only triggering after 5 posts.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with: