Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Options for redundant connections between M4100 and M6100
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-02-18
03:17 PM
2019-02-18
03:17 PM
Options for redundant connections between M4100 and M6100
I've inherited a network that's currently 1 large broadcast domain with approximately 2000 clients. I'm working with a fiber backbone and have 40x M4100 lagged to an M6100 with 2x XCM8944F blades. My initial goal is to segment the devices using VLANs and subnets and am leaning toward a ROAS configuration. The network is currently using RIP and I would like to move over to OSPF in the near future. I've been weighing the differences between using VRRP, OSPF, and LAG connections for redundancy throughout my network and am hoping to get some feedback on what the community thinks of using these technologies with my topology.
Model: GSM7224Pv1h2 | M4100-24G-PoE+ProSAFE 24-port Gigabit Fully Managed L2 Switch with PoE+, XCM8944F | M6100Blade 40xSFP and 4x10G
Message 1 of 1