Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
RN104: USB3 vs ESATA?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-07
12:43 PM
2014-03-07
12:43 PM
RN104: USB3 vs ESATA?
Which interface on RN104 is fastest to connect a (fast) external SSD-disk to?
Or does anybody now which kind of ESATA it has (rev 1, 2 or 3)?
Hopefully it's possible to use bcace (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcache) in the future...
Or does anybody now which kind of ESATA it has (rev 1, 2 or 3)?
Hopefully it's possible to use bcace (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcache) in the future...
Message 1 of 4
Labels:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-07
01:44 PM
2014-03-07
01:44 PM
Re: RN104: USB3 vs ESATA?
In either case: USB3 or eSATA, the limiting factor is the hard drive. (Assuming a single drive external device).
Message 2 of 4
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-07
07:14 PM
2014-03-07
07:14 PM
Re: RN104: USB3 vs ESATA?
Have there been tests to look at CPU/chipset usage with USB and eSATA? The limiting factor will be the CPU of the system.
Message 3 of 4
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-10
05:01 PM
2014-03-10
05:01 PM
Re: RN104: USB3 vs ESATA?
Sorry. I don't have any CPU resource data for USB vs. eSATA.
Message 4 of 4