Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
performance: Ultra 6 Plus v 316
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2013-12-22
04:08 PM
2013-12-22
04:08 PM
performance: Ultra 6 Plus v 316
In general, which would be faster for routine file access (no videa transcoding) - an Ultra 6 Plus or a 316?
(I already an Ultra 6 plus)
Does the 316 have enough horsepower to handle real time encryption and "unlimited" snapshots without significant performance loss?
(I already an Ultra 6 plus)
Does the 316 have enough horsepower to handle real time encryption and "unlimited" snapshots without significant performance loss?
Message 1 of 2
Labels:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2013-12-22
04:13 PM
2013-12-22
04:13 PM
Re: performance: Ultra 6 Plus v 316
alexofindy wrote: In general, which would be faster for routine file access (no videa transcoding) - an Ultra 6 Plus or a 316?
Maybe still the Ultra 6 Plus. The 316 has an Intel Atom CPU and could more be considered to be an improvement over the Ultra 6.
alexofindy wrote:
Does the 316 have enough horsepower to handle real time encryption and "unlimited" snapshots without significant performance loss?
I think if you want that you should consider the 516/716 which have much more powerful CPUs.
Message 2 of 2