- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
It's Sad but XR300 appear to be bad and slow :(
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: It's Sad but XR300 appear to be bad and slow :(
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: It's Sad but XR300 appear to be bad and slow :(
Here is my typical setup
Admin:Set password
Internet Setup: Static IP, subnet, gateway, DNS servers
Lan: IP and subnet, No DHCP
Static route: Setup a static route for a range of private subnets out of range of LAN to route to a vpn box.
Wireless configure wifi, new SSIDs and network key.
UPNP: Turn Off
LED control on X300 - omg its got bad lights - turn as much off as possible.
Backup settings, Reboot.
Would then tweak qos if needed etc after tests and monitoring etc
I think that is about it, may not be 'typical' but nothing out of the ordinary.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: It's Sad but XR300 appear to be bad and slow :(
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: It's Sad but XR300 appear to be bad and slow :(
UPNP - don't trust it as it's a security liability - if i need a port opened i will set it up - very rarely need it tbh. Yea I am that paranoid.
The IP addresses accross my network are controlled by my DHCP Server with adresses reserved on it for router IP address and a few other devices - so they can't be used elsewhere. I run speed tests on multiple devices not just a single ip address.
Changing the router LAN IP would be a complete pain and I dont see how / why that could cause the issues I am facing.
Just remembered another setting I change - I change the MTU size to 1462 as that is the best MTU to use - after running mltiplr tests across multiple machines. But I have tried default incase it was effecting speed, it did not appear to.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: It's Sad but XR300 appear to be bad and slow :(
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: It's Sad but XR300 appear to be bad and slow :(
The speed is fine as long as the wifi is turned off.
Routing ports 80 and 443 is pretty basic for a router to be able to route.
If I had another router that could hadle the throughput I would be using that instead of trying to understand the issue with the XR300.
Maybe it's time to decide if I just keep this and accept it's trash but will work with no wifi and learn a lesson from my brand loyalty. This is the first major issue I have had after about 15 routers from netgear I guess times change and we need to move with them.
Thanks for all you thoughts and ideas, I feel we are just clutching at straws now.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: It's Sad but XR300 appear to be bad and slow :(
http://www.netgearinnovation.com/dumaos-beta/index.html
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
• What is the difference between WiFi 6 and WiFi 7?
• Yes! WiFi 7 is backwards compatible with other Wifi devices? Learn more