This topic has been marked solved and closed to new posts due to inactivity. We hope you'll join the conversation by posting to an open topic or starting a new one.
a question sorry, I was thinking, if I put the dmz on the ip the ip should not change even if it is not static as the modem is connected only the router should not change ip
That's correct - it's something called a 'DHCP lease'. A device connected to a router or modem will continue to have the same IP address when it's online (unless you force it to change of course). If it goes offline, it will have the same IP address if it reconnects within the DHCP lease time e.g. 1 day. If it connects after this time, it will probably get a new IP address from the modem or router.
Per connettersi ad Internet tramite la rete FIbra di TIM in tecnologia FTTC, il router deve supportare lo standard VDSL2 con spettro 8b e 17a. E' altresì consigliato il supporto dello spettro 35b.
E' importante anche il pieno supporto delle funzionalità tecniche di seguito riportate:
Retransmission(ITU-T G.998.4)
Vectoring( ITU-T G.993.5)
SRA (ITU-T G.993.2)
Per configurare una connessione sempre attiva da parte del modem/router, iparametrinecessari sono i seguenti:
USERNAME: numero_telefonico
PASSWORD:timadsl
PROTOCOLLO:PPPoE Routed(definito come RFC 2516)
INCAPSULAMENTO: PTM
NAT: attivo
VLAN:835
these are the credentials that my isp says to have on the router to fit the problem is how do i put it?
Is PPPoE absolutely required or are you looking for things you think will improve your connection? If possible I would not advise using PPPoE as QoS may not be as effective.
Ok, so I leave the ip wan address so I do not use ppoe so it should be better? I put the static ip on both the router and the modem and put the mtu on the router at 1500 the sip alg filter by turning off I can notice better line?
The ISP requires a PPPoE connection there is no way around the encapsulation (complete unrelated to QoS).... and it's unlikley an MTU of 1500 is possible at all.
If PPPoE was absolutely necessary you wouldn't have an internet connection without it through the router. So that tells me that it's an option they provide, that you can use PPPoE. It's been seen in the past that PPPoE does not work fully with QoS which is something for us to work on. So if it's not necessary I would advise not using PPPoE.
Can you also remind us please what is the issue you're actually having? As I feel we gave you the correct answers towards the beginning. This topic is now 6 pages long and it seems like you're satisfied. So if you can remind us we can resolve this quicker.
@Netduma-Fraser wrote: If PPPoE was absolutely necessary you wouldn't have an internet connection without it through the router. So that tells me that it's an option they provide, that you can use PPPoE.
At the price of double NAT and limited control over up and downstrsam on the XR, terminating the PPPoE session on the modem (in NAT router mode) is the only other option.
@Netduma-Fraser wrote: It's been seen in the past that PPPoE does not work fully with QoS which is something for us to work on. So if it's not necessary I would advise not using PPPoE.
At the end of the day it's yet another interface type - so whats the point here? PPPoE (and to some extent even PPPoA) are still valid and common encapsulations for Internet connection in the world.
@Netduma-Fraser wrote: Can you also remind us please what is the issue you're actually having?
The OP talked of lag.
Ref the MTU - you have to run the classic check with ping to discover the packet size possible without fragementtion.
Start a ping test with a ICMP payload size size of 1472 bytes, reduce buffer size by 8 byte (1472-8 = 1464, 1456, 1404, etc.) until you get 0% packet LOSS and no more DF required.
Ping wird ausgeführt für www.google.com [216.58.215.228] mit 1472 Bytes Daten: Antwort von 172.16.116.1: Paket müsste fragmentiert werden, DF-Flag ist jedoch gesetzt. Paket müsste fragmentiert werden, DF-Flag ist jedoch gesetzt. Paket müsste fragmentiert werden, DF-Flag ist jedoch gesetzt.
Ping wird ausgeführt für www.google.com [216.58.215.228] mit 1464 Bytes Daten: Antwort von 216.58.215.228: Bytes=64 (gesendet 1464) Zeit=9ms TTL=54 ... 'C
At the point where the DF is no longer required, add 20 for the IP header plus 8 for the ICMP header), so here 1464+20+8 so the optimal Internet interface MTU will be 1492.
If your existing modem handles your speeds and doesn't give you any jitter/spikes on an uncongested network then you're probably unlikely to have a better experience with that new modem.
It will roll out with the next firmware update, but we don't have a date for when that will be yet. But there is an easy solution which you can do now. Please do this workaround for now:
1. Go to the Device Manager.
2. Click on your Gaming PC.
3. In the new panel that opens, change the device type to a PlayStation.
4. Go to the Geo-Filter.
5. Delete your PC from the top Geo-Filter panel if you have added it previously.
6. Now add your PC. It should automatically be added with the 'console' service.
7. Decide if you want to use Filtering Mode or Spectating Mode depending on the game you are playing
can you tell me why every now and then when I reboot the modem connected to the modem I lose the internet connection and am forced to restart everything again
Restart modem, wait for it to boot up properly (wait 1-2mins), then reboot the router. The modem doesn't negotiate properly with the device that's stayed connected for some reason. Happens a lot with modems.
