NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
AllForPun
Jun 22, 2020Aspirant
R6400V2 failed firmware
Ok all, I was recently (today) upgrading my frimware for the R6400v2 through the router's web portal. While uploading the firmware, it failed. No idea why it failed, but it did. Suddenly, I l...
- Jun 23, 2020
> [...] what appears to be a cycle [...]
In some cases, the router can get into a (failing) boot loop, which
might mean that if it's ever receptive to a TFTP load, then you might
need to catch it at the right time. Some experimentation may be needed.> [...] (see attached).
You're running the "tftp" program, and then giving _it_ a command to
run the "tftp" program.> [...] But the "$" int he above is what confuses me.
What was on the line before what you posted? That "$" was supposed
to represent (abbreviated) the prompt from your shell (which, as your
"ping" picture showed, is pretty long, but does end in "$ ").So, the actual command should look like:
<blah-blah-blah> $ tftp 192.168.1.1of which you type only: tftp 192.168.1.1
The "tftp" program uses a "tftp> " prompt, and you type whatever
appears after that in the example.> [...] I'm sorry, I'm a bit novice at this. [...]
I noticed. Just bask in the education. Wheee.
> [...] I already did the /usr/bin/tftp bit to access the tftp.
That was what the "tftp 192.168.1.1" command was for. You could,
instead, do:$ tftp
tftp> connect 192.168.1.1which would be equivalent to (but more work than):
$ tftp 192.168.1.1
The "put fred.img" command assumes that your firmware image file (use
its actual name) is in the shell's current directory. Otherwise, you'd
need to specify an appropriate path to it (like the one (partially)
shown in your Tftpd64 screen shot, but with a Mac/unix syntax instead of
a PC\Windows syntax). For some shell navigation basics, see, for
example:
antinode
Jun 23, 2020Guru
> [...] it's looking for replies from the computer IP (192.168.1.10).
I 'd read that not as it looking for replies from "192.168.1.10", but
that the system at "192.168.1.10" is complaining.
"destination host unreachable" suggests to me a bad IP/routing
configuration somewhere. Did you disable the Wi-Fi interface on this
Windows system, and properly configure its Ethernet interface? Having
both interfaces active (especially on the same subnet) could cause some
confusion.
AllForPun
Jun 23, 2020Aspirant
>Did you disable the Wi-Fi interface on this
>Windows system, and properly configure its Ethernet interface?
I do believe so. Attached is my configuration on the Ethernet interface. I have been hotspotting on my phone throughout all of this, so I turned my hotspot off and set my Mac to the same Static IP info as what attached. I also turned off my MacBook Pro's wi-fi.
Again, I'm running parallels, so I thought perhaps both OS systems needed to be set to static.
Through all of this, setting both OS systems to static, turning off my hotspot, I am still receiving the "Destination host unreachable" message when attempting to ping the IP from Windows OS (I'm running Windows 8, btw).