- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Re: RB53 vs RB50 for 5000. Sq ft
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
RB53 vs RB50 for 5000. Sq ft
First of all I am not very tech savvy so thanks for any input.
i went ahead and got the 53 with 2 satellites figuring overkill would be better since I was wanting some coverage behind our house.
i just read something that each satellite use a dedicated band for backhaul to the router and that the extra satellite may actually clog up the system and hurt speed.
thanks for the help.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: RB53 vs RB50 for 5000. Sq ft
You should be fine. I have one router and two sats in a 3,000 SF 3-level home with no issues.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: RB53 vs RB50 for 5000. Sq ft
I use a base router and just satellite for my 5000sq ft home.
Recommend 30 feet to begin with in between the base router and satellite(s).
Good Luck.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: RB53 vs RB50 for 5000. Sq ft
I have the RBK50 with two RBS50 satelites for a 6000 sq ft home and it works great -- in fact I can get wifi out in my driveway all the way to the street. You should be fine.
• Introducing NETGEAR WiFi 7 Orbi 770 Series and Nighthawk RS300
• What is the difference between WiFi 6 and WiFi 7?
• Yes! WiFi 7 is backwards compatible with other Wifi devices? Learn more