Multiple VLAN on S3300 switch

[darkogav]

Hello, I am having issues getting multiple VLANs on same switch to work. The switch is setup as per below. I have the latest 6.6.4.21 image on this switch.

VLAN 1 -- uplink port is port 47.

ports 1 thru 24 and ports 37 thru 48 are untagged members on VLAN 1.

Everything works fine.

I am trying to get ports 25 thru 36 to be members on a different VLAN 300

port 25 is the uplink port connected to a trunk port.

port 25 is a tagged memeber of VLANs 1, 300 and 4089

port 25 is PVID 1.

ports 26 thru 36 are untagged members of VLAN 300

It this the correct method to setup this multiple VLAN setup on this product? I am not able to exit outside the subnet where this VLAN 300 is setup. I can ping the router but nothing else. Do I need to setup VLAN routing to get this to work?

[darkogav · Accepted solution]

Thanks. I suspect there is a misconfiguration of this swtich. I sort of inherited it from someone else. I will look at configuring it correcty.

[schumaku]

Looks OK that far. Made one addition to your list - this should to the job:

...trying to get ports 25 thru 36 to be members on a different VLAN 300

port 25 is the uplink port connected to a trunk port.

port 25 is a tagged memeber of VLANs 1, 300 and 4089

port 25 is PVID 1.

ports 26 thru 36 are untagged members of VLAN 300
port 26 thru 36 PVID 300

[darkogav]

Yes. ports 26 thru 36 are PVID 300

However, traffic is not getting through on that VLAN.

Is there a ACL or some sort that is enabled by default on this product?

One additional note is, the same uplink switch servers two separate VLANs on this S3300 switch.

There is a VLAN 200 which is service all the ports not on VLAN 300.

So the setup for VLAN 200 is

port 47 is uplink port.

ports 47 is a untagged memeber on VLAN 1

ports 1 thru 24 and ports 37 thru 52 are untagged members of VLAN 200

ports 1 thru 24 and ports 37 thru 52 are PVID 1

ports 1 thru 24 are untagged members of LAG 1

Does that have anything to do with it?

[schumaku]

---

@darkogav wrote:

So the setup for VLAN 200 is

port 47 is uplink port.

ports 47 is a untagged memeber on VLAN 1

---

How do you intend the uplink (trunk) for VLAN 200 on port 47 if it's untagged VLAN 1? Either the port 47 does have the VLAN 200 tagged (and the other side does take it as tagged), or if it's intended to be untagged it has to be untagged only for the VLAN 200 with the PVID 200.

---

@darkogav wrote:

ports 1 thru 24 and ports 37 thru 52 are untagged members of VLAN 200

ports 1 thru 24 and ports 37 thru 52 are PVID 1

---

If you want these ports bringing untagged traffic flowin to the switch to the VLAN 200 (as the outgoing traffic is untagged) the PVID must be 200.

---

@darkogav wrote:

ports 1 thru 24 are untagged members of LAG 1

---

Here we have a fatal one - strongly doubt you want all these 24 ports in a LAG. Do you?

[darkogav · Accepted solution]

Thanks. I suspect there is a misconfiguration of this swtich. I sort of inherited it from someone else. I will look at configuring it correcty.