This topic has been marked solved and closed to new posts due to inactivity. We hope you'll join the conversation by posting to an open topic or starting a new one.
That's the right way of doing it, but again we haven't been able to reproduce problems with doing that so there must be something specific to your setup.
That's the right way of doing it, but again we haven't been able to reproduce problems with doing that so there must be something specific to your setup.
RAID-0 in the EDA500 wouldn't help with performance and performance is the key reason to use RAID-0. Not caring about data loss where the performance isn't going to be helped by using RAID-0, using a separate volume for each disk would be better than one big RAID-0 volume.
We let some poor RAID configurations be used if users really want them to. After all it's your data and you can decide whether you want to use a high risk configuration or not.
Exactly, and a risky configuration that brings no risk to the user a good choice
In term of performance i am not an expert but the nas manage only one volume, apps see only one volume...it may be better, in any case it is not worst that separate volumes
and this "poor" configuration as you say is much more convenient than separate volume and let me save mote that 3To of space, i same money and i am richer
In any case data on a NAS shall always be saved in a backup. In case of failure i will re create a volume and past my data, not a big deal as my nas if for personnal usage at home
RAID-0 on an EDA wouldn't lead to a performance gain. In the main chassis it would if you are using teaming and are able to take advantage of that, but in the EDA there isn't a performance reason to use RAID-0.
