- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Solved! Go to Solution.
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
All Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
The wndr3400 was designed before the usb 3 standard was even designed on paper I know today usb ports are color coded but when usb 2 was new and placed into electronic devices such issues of color was not important now days the ports on the devices we use are changing ever few years it seems.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
Most of the people who write the information on their web sites never lived through the changes of the serial port into the usb1 then2 now 3.0 and 3.1 even being replaced now on paper by faster standards and just repeat a scape. Color means little when yellow is ground and black is signal line by some wiring codes .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
Netgear says it has usb 2 port in it's manual's http://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/datasheet/en/WNDR3400v3.pdf.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
For a new person it's hard to get as after seeing blue port he will think it's usb3 port and after purchasing router he will think he is cheated .
Even on many website ur router image is displayed with blue color USB port instead of black.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
I have seen the pictures you were looking at the wndr3400v1 even has a blue usb port. What do you need the router to do?
The color blue even has a value of 6 on the color code chart for resistors so it is all in how you look at it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
@Swapnil_1989 wrote:
But on each and every online shopping sites also it's showing blue USB port image of router which directly says the perticular model supports USB 3.0
USB 3.0 mandates the blue insert color, but USB 2.0 was silent on that. So a USB 2-only product is compliant with the original USB 2 spec even if it uses the blue color. The purpose of the color change was to make it easy for users to see which ports within the same product were USB 3 and which were not. It wasn't intended to advertise that the model itself supported USB 3.
The WNDR3400v1 goes back to 2010, and the WNDR3400v2 was introduced in 2011 - well before the USB 3.0 spec was published in 2013. So both would be clearly USB 2.0 compliant (even if they used blue inserts) at the time they were introduced.
The artwork currently on Netgear's site shows a black insert color on the WNDR3400v3, and the diagrams all clearly say USB 2.0 port. But resellers use whatever art work they want, and in my experience it often doesn't match the shipped product - especially in a case like this, where you have three different hardware changes over the lifetime of the product..
You could of course return/exchange the router for a newer one - and if you purchased a WNDR3400v1 or v2, I suggest you do that, since the products were built in 2014 or earlier.
Since you care about the speed of the router storage, I suggest you check out the router reviews before purchase (smallnetbuilder.com measures storage speed in all their reviews). Even with USB 3.0 connectors, the router storage can be limited by other factors, including the disk format, and the router's CPU performance and the network speed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
If the speed of storage is important a nas server would give the best possible speed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
@William10a wrote:
If the speed of storage is important a nas server would give the best possible speed.
I agree (and use NAS servers myself). Though many of the newer higher-end routers test out quite well.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
If the product getting delivered to customer is black USB port then on webpage it should display black only not blue . Blue USB port says it's USB 3.0 port
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
And on many site I have seen they are displaying as USB port is present but they are not mentioning it's USB 2.0 port where as user sees it's a blue port by which enduser thinks wnbr3400 router has 3.0 USB port.
And if u say netgear old router had blue color port at start then it's ok but company should update the images on webpage too to make sure we are not providing wrong information
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
No one on this thread so far works for Netgear. I've forwarded the link to a Netgear Mod, so maybe they will follow up here.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
do we have any updates from Netgear team on this issue ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
Not a Netgear official, however ... most information in the Internet ref. USB 3.0 and black vs. blue inserts is bluntly wrong. For example many notebook vendors are using USB 3.0 with black or white or whatever colour inserts for design reasons. Using the blue insert colour was and is only a recommendation to distinguish if USB 2 and USB 3.0 ports exist on the same system. Even blue inserts are USB-IF compliant for USB 2 ports if there are no USB 3.0 ports.
USB-IF Compliance Updates #78 clarified this:
Blue Pantone (color) in USB 3.0 Connectors
Mandate: Informational
Effective Date: June, 2011
The use of blue pantone thermoplastics in USB 3.0 connectors is recommended on systems with a mix of USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 ports. For certification, the USB-IF does require that the user be able to clearly and easily distinguish between a USB 3.0 and a USB 2.0 port on a system; however, it is left to the system implementer on how to accomplish this.
PS. @StephenB The USB 3.0 standard was published on 12 September 2008 ... 8-)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
Most of the time it comes down the cost of the part there was a time capacitors where going bad on mother boards of computers just because a company sold the caps at very low price and they were used.
If you have millions of a part in stock you use it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
@schumaku "For example many notebook vendors are using USB 3.0 with black or white or whatever colour inserts for design reasons. Using the blue insert colour was and is only a recommendation to distinguish if USB 2 and USB 3.0 ports exist on the same system"
see i know all this but consider a enduser who is not aware about all this things, he knows blue color means Usb 3 and black means 2.0 . then ?
And on company webpage its shown as blue but when the enduser recives the router the usb port provided is in black color. If you are showing a blue color port atleast provide it to avoid confuiions. And again in market this router is being sold with black color port that is 2.0 USB port only . So why Ntegear site is showing blue color port on webpage.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
A simple answer is the web store who sales the item include a statement the item may appear different from the picture at lease the end user would know it is possible to receive a router with different colored ports.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
Why? Because there is nothing wrong. Completely legal, completely correct. Matter of fact many vendors (even the SoC makers sample boards) used the blue ones.
Still, the fact that you think blue is USB 3.0 is wrong. Only the specs are relevant. Nobody will update pictures in this consumer class market. Even less, no reseller or retailer will update his online offering.
Years ago, a NAS vendor has introduced an "updated" Mk.II or "plus" model of an existing product - along with a newer SoC two of the four USB ports were updated to USB 3.0. The marketing images remained the same.
It's a budget box. The performance of the processor is much to limited anyway to make use of the USB 3.0 bandwidth - there would not be any advantage. Buy it, or leave it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
@William10a : A simple answer is the web store who sales the item include a statement the item may appear different from the picture at lease the end user would know it is possible to receive a router with different colored ports.
But why there is a inconsistency on Netgear webpage ? i have posted the image in my first post please check
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
Just a change in the supplier of the usb port or a new shipment it is all part of the world we live in one day a glass jar the next day a plastic jar but the same product.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
i dont agree on the above statement which u made , its a business. i have a conversation history saved with me in which Netgear source said yes its a wrong advertisment.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
@Swapnil_1989 wrote:i dont agree on the above statement which u made , its a business. i have a conversation history saved with me in which Netgear source said yes its a wrong advertisment.
Netgear is technicaly and legally wrong, too. They just try to be nice to thier prospect customers. I'm just honest and have provieded proof that you are wrong. And you hate this. I don't care.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
Let's agree to disagree Netgear made three versions of this router each with changes to the hardware changes were made inside the router but in the end it is still a wndr3400 n600 dual band router and matter the looks change or did not change.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Inconsistency observed in information provided for Netgear router WNDR3400 on Netgear webpage,
@Swapnil_1989 Thank you for your feedback. The page will be updated soon.
• What is the difference between WiFi 6 and WiFi 7?
• Yes! WiFi 7 is backwards compatible with other Wifi devices? Learn more