NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Solved
Need an ethernet port on other side of house from router
I am adding an additional NVR security system on the opposite side of the house from my router. It requires an ethernet port for connectivity. I have had a Netgear EX6150 AC1200 WIFI extender for...
Have you tried something like powerline or a moca adapter? Not all homes work well with powerline but it is an option. And moca adapters work pretty well too.
Or if you have to have it over wireless, then a mesh system like orbi might be a better option than trying to daisy chain extenders. You'll lose significant amounts of throughput and have quite a bit of latency daisy chaining extenders.
I just read about MoCa. If my router and modem were MoCa compatible I still don't have a coaxial cable hook up near where the NVR is located. So I still need to go wireless to that point. Can you tell me why Orbi might work better? Does it have a stronger (longer) reach over the air? I don't mind spending the money if I find something that works well.
I had hoped on this Netgear forum that someone would say "Oh that's not a problem with the new xxxx router or xxx extender. They carry much longer distance or they can pick up the router signal at a longer distance." Maybe I'm looking for something that doesn't exist yet. But I hoped it would save me hours of research and possible waste of money trying to solve this issue.
I certainly appreciate your response. I can still learn something every day in the tech world.
daveharriett wrote:I just read about MoCa. If my router and modem were MoCa compatible I still don't have a coaxial cable hook up near where the NVR is located. So I still need to go wireless to that point. Can you tell me why Orbi might work better? Does it have a stronger (longer) reach over the air? I don't mind spending the money if I find something that works well.
I had hoped on this Netgear forum that someone would say "Oh that's not a problem with the new xxxx router or xxx extender. They carry much longer distance or they can pick up the router signal at a longer distance." Maybe I'm looking for something that doesn't exist yet. But I hoped it would save me hours of research and possible waste of money trying to solve this issue.
I certainly appreciate your response. I can still learn something every day in the tech world.
reason orbi might work better (the tri-bands) is that they reserve 1 radio chip just for router---satellite communication. This helps reduce the throughput and latency hit you take by using extenders. They also offer both daisy chain and star configurations and they adjust to what works best.
Meaning they can go:
Star: satellite<----------router--------->satellite
Daisy chain: Router-------->satellite--------->satellite
or even a combination: satellite<----------router-------->satellite--------->satellite
plus they offer ethernet backhaul.
And some of the satellites have ethernet jacks on them for hardwiring in devices.
And if you have area's that need better coverage, its easy to add additional satellites with orbi. Regular extenders don't work well if you're needing more than 1.
Plus it uses 1 ssid for the router/satellites so you arent having to constantly switch between ssid's.
Reason there hasn't been a "new router that has much longer range" is that the FCC sets broadcast limits on power. thats why you aren't seeing the range improvements that prior generations brought. But you are seeing better throughput speeds at those distances. And better tolerance for multiple devices sending/receiving at the same time.
if you do look at orbi, the 50 series has the highest throughput backhaul.