Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Re: Allocation question (Why u no take advantage of 3TB driv
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-07-02
03:16 PM
2012-07-02
03:16 PM
Allocation question (Why u no take advantage of 3TB drives?)
Hello,
I have an Ultra 6+ with the current RAIDiator (4.2.21) and this configuration: RAID Level X-RAID2, 6 disks (with dual redundancy).
I have three 2 TB drives (1863 GB, 1858 GB allocated) and three 3 TB drives (2794 GB, only 1858 GB allocated).
Question: Why do the 3 TB drives only have 1858 GB allocated? What drives could I remove/add to so that RAIDiator would use the 3 TB drives to their full capacity?
— Charles
P.S. I've tried to research this issue before posting. I've done things like enable full data journaling, disable spin-down, delete and disabled snapshots, etc. and restarted many times. My feeling now is that it's not an expansion problem per se, but an X-RAID2 "rules" problem that I don't yet understand.
I have an Ultra 6+ with the current RAIDiator (4.2.21) and this configuration: RAID Level X-RAID2, 6 disks (with dual redundancy).
I have three 2 TB drives (1863 GB, 1858 GB allocated) and three 3 TB drives (2794 GB, only 1858 GB allocated).
Question: Why do the 3 TB drives only have 1858 GB allocated? What drives could I remove/add to so that RAIDiator would use the 3 TB drives to their full capacity?
— Charles
P.S. I've tried to research this issue before posting. I've done things like enable full data journaling, disable spin-down, delete and disabled snapshots, etc. and restarted many times. My feeling now is that it's not an expansion problem per se, but an X-RAID2 "rules" problem that I don't yet understand.
Message 1 of 6
Labels:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-07-02
03:30 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-07-02
04:33 PM
2012-07-02
04:33 PM
Re: Allocation question (Why u no take advantage of 3TB driv
pugilares, with xraid2 the sizing is different. The 3 TB drives should be fully available. leaving about 10 TB of total available space (single redundancy).
CharlesW - I suggest you open a support ticket (perhaps an on-line one if your free phone support is over). You appear to have done everything listed here: viewtopic.php?f=66&t=42113
CharlesW - I suggest you open a support ticket (perhaps an on-line one if your free phone support is over). You appear to have done everything listed here: viewtopic.php?f=66&t=42113
Message 3 of 6
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-07-02
05:18 PM
2012-07-02
05:18 PM
Re: Allocation question (Why u no take advantage of 3TB driv
Don't bother with a support case just yet Charles. Using dual-redundancy you need four higher capacity disks for vertical expansion. Add a fourth 3TB disk and your volume will be able to expand.
Take a look at X-RAID2 dual-redundancy expansion paths
Take a look at X-RAID2 dual-redundancy expansion paths
Message 4 of 6
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-07-02
05:43 PM
2012-07-02
05:43 PM
Re: Allocation question (Why u no take advantage of 3TB driv
oops missed the dual redundancy... mdgm is correct as usual.
Message 5 of 6
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-07-02
07:16 PM
2012-07-02
07:16 PM
Re: Allocation question (Why u no take advantage of 3TB driv
Cool! Many thanks for the quick replies, StephenB and mdgm. I can now order a fourth 3 TB drive with confidence.
— Charles
— Charles
Message 6 of 6