- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Less than 30% free, how will performance be degraded?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Less than 30% free, how will performance be degraded?
I'm getting messages that the free space is less than 30% and that performance will be degraded. Can anyone tell me what exactly will be degraded? I hope they don't mean transfer speeds. I don't run anything on this box. No services, snapshots, antivirus, etc. Just smb.
I'm a bit salty about the 30% too. Does the system need that much headroom? It's down right rediculous IMO.
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Less than 30% free, how will performance be degraded?
The performance of read/writing to the volume is at greater risk of degrading as free space is less than 30%. As to when you'll start to see a noticeable difference in transfer speeds that depends on a variety of factors. That may not be till it's say over 80%.
In any case you should consider expanding your volume or freeing up some space.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Less than 30% free, how will performance be degraded?
Thanks for your help, mgdm. I will see how it goes. I'm just using the nas to stream to my Dune players, so a solid MB/s transfer rate is all I am after. I'm throwing 2 more disks in the array (which is what triggered the other thread re: the resync). I just don't think I can afford to waste 30 or even 20%. Is this common among all NAS products? Do dofferent brands require less overhead than others?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Less than 30% free, how will performance be degraded?
@Blanker-2 wrote:
Do dofferent brands require less overhead than others?
It's not really about the brand, it's the choice of file system. EXT is the traditional choice, but many newer NAS - including ReadyNAS - have switched to BTRFS. BTRFS is in many ways superior, but it does need more free space. One reason is that metadata and data share the same space pool - ext reserves space up from for metatdata (inodes).
In my experience, 30% is pretty conservative, you can get by with 20%. If you turn snapshots off, you can probably get by with 15%.