× NETGEAR will be terminating ReadyCLOUD service by July 1st, 2023. For more details click here.
Orbi WiFi 7 RBE973

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

pywong
Aspirant

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

Is there a newer version of the BIOs than "07/26/2010 FLAME6-MB V2.0"? and where can I get it?

I have the ReadyNAS Pro 6.

Thanks
Message 501 of 1,275
ATCIS
Tutor

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

pywong wrote:
Is there a newer version of the BIOs than "07/26/2010 FLAME6-MB V2.0"? and where can I get it?

I have the ReadyNAS Pro 6.

Thanks

I believe that the file linked here http://www.readynas.com/download/addons ... .5-x86.bin is the latest publicly known BIOS package. If there is a newer one, I guess NETGEAR is keeping it under wraps. . . 😞
Message 502 of 1,275
mdgm-ntgr
NETGEAR Employee Retired

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

I'm not aware of the existence of any newer BIOS for it. Do you have any issues with the current BIOS? Seeing the Pro 6 is now EOL unless there is a critical issue that needs fixing that affects use of the NAS with stock CPU & memory and running 4.2.x I doubt there would be any further updates.
Message 503 of 1,275
pywong
Aspirant

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

mdgm wrote:
I'm not aware of the existence of any newer BIOS for it. Do you have any issues with the current BIOS? Seeing the Pro 6 is now EOL unless there is a critical issue that needs fixing that affects use of the NAS with stock CPU & memory and running 4.2.x I doubt there would be any further updates.


Just wondering, because some people did not have the backlight problems using OS 6, whereas the Pro 6 does.
Message 504 of 1,275
mdgm-ntgr
NETGEAR Employee Retired

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

Well running ReadyNAS OS 6 on the Pro is not supported. If the issue is not present when running 4.2.x that would suggest a software issue not an issue with the BIOS
Message 505 of 1,275
ATCIS
Tutor

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

Okay. . . next stupid question:

In my ongoing quest to determine if OS6 is ready to house any actual data that I give a hoot about, I decided to do a little "Fault Tolerance" testing.

Here's the test platform:
A "new out of the box" ReadyNAS Pro with stock CPU, and Memory upgraded to 4GB's
4 X 2TB Western Digital WD2002FYPS RE4 Hard Drives populated in drive bays 1 through 4 (RAID 5 - X-RAID2)
RAID Array build process completed and stable, then rested for 12 hours
BIOS recently upgraded to v2.0 (Thanks mdgm!)

After confirmation that test data could be written to and read from the NAS, I pulled the drive out of bay 4 (hot) to pseudo-simulate a drive failure.
Waited 15 minutes, reconfirmed that test data could be written to and read from the NAS, then I replaced the drive in bay 4 with a different unformatted Western Digital WD2002FYPS RE4 Hard Drive. I checked the GUI which had the expected notifications of drive removals and insertions, but that's about it. I kind of expected the new drive to be added back into the array after the obligatory re-sync period. To the contrary, the new drive is just sitting there and the RAID5 array seems oblivious to the fact that a fresh drive is available for reintegration back into the array. I'm obviously missing something here. . .
Just for S's&G's I've rebooted, pulled and reinserted the blank drive a couple of times, skimmed the official OS6 documentation; I can't figure out how to reintegrate the new drive into the exsisting array.

This GUI currently shows this:

School me please! This should not be this counterintuitive. . . :nashammer:
Message 506 of 1,275
mdgm-ntgr
NETGEAR Employee Retired

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

So are you using X-RAID2 or not?

What options do you see if you click on the data volume?

What happens of you click on the drive that is not highlighted in blue?
Message 507 of 1,275
ATCIS
Tutor

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

mdgm wrote:
So are you using X-RAID2 or not?

X-RAID2 = YES

mdgm wrote:
What options do you see if you click on the data volume?




If I click Settings I get this:



mdgm wrote:
What happens of you click on the drive that is not highlighted in blue?

I get something that looks like a "Thought Bubble" (like you would see in the Sunday Comics) with a bunch of Hard Drive statistics, like - ID, Model Number, Serial number, Firmware version, RPM, Sectors, etc, etc. I can't screenshot it because it disappears as soon as I move my mouse away from the image 🙂
Message 508 of 1,275
mdgm-ntgr
NETGEAR Employee Retired

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

You added an unformatted disk. Did you verify that the disk had no partitions on it?

If you download the logs and extract the zip contents what does partition.log look like?
Message 509 of 1,275
ATCIS
Tutor

OS6 Fault Tolerance Testing continues. . .

mdgm wrote:
You added an unformatted disk. Did you verify that the disk had no partitions on it?


Initially NO (bad move on my part). But after it didn't work the first time, I took it back out, connected it to a computer and saw that it was partitioned and formatted NTFS. So I deleted the NTFS partition, put it back in the ReadyNAS and continued my testing (which failed epicly).

mdgm wrote:
If you download the logs and extract the zip contents what does partition.log look like?


Yeah, I'm actually typing up another post with some interesting discoveries since my previous post. I'll be done with that in 15 or 20 minutes from now. Check it out in bit. . . :shock:
Message 510 of 1,275
ATCIS
Tutor

Fault tolerance testing continues. . . (SOLVED, maybe)

It just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser. . .

So, since no one chimed in with any suggestions, I just kept playing with stuff. Here is what I've done so far:
1.) I shut the ReadyNAS Pro down
2.) I removed the fresh drive that was in Bay 4 which was supposed to be the replacement for the pseudo-failed drive
a. So at this point all that is in the box are drives in Bays 1, 2, and 3
3.) I moved the drive in Bay 3 to Bay 4, 2 to Bay 3 and 1 to Bay 2, essencially shifting the entire array down one drive slot (so now Bay 1 is empty)
4.) I powered the ReadyNAS back on. Much to my surprise, it actually booted up just fine.
5.) I waited about 10 minutes, logged into the GUI, checked the logs, and everything seems okay
6.) I reinserted the new drive that did not get incorporated into the array previously, this time into Bay 5. Still no magic happening. . . :-?
7.) Now I'm getting annoyed. Since I was about 15 minutes away from doing a sledgehammer reset on the damn thing (Factory Default and start over) anyway, I decided to take the original drive (that started out in Bay 4), connect it to a computer, erase the three partitions that the ReadyNAS OS created on it, and shoved THAT drive into Bay 6.
8.) Guess what? See the screenshot below. . .



So, in case anyone is wondering what my plans are now:

9.) Once the array finishes Re-syncing (about 6 hours from now) I plan to re-remove the screwy drive currently in Bay 5 and run some basic forensics on it to see if I can figure out why the ReadyNAS is treating it like a "Red-Headed Step Child"
10.) Then I intend on DBAN'ing it (http://www.dban.org/), formatting it, and surface testing it
11.) If all that is a success, I'll clear any remaining partitions and put it back into Bay 5 and see what happens. . .

Oh what fun it is to. . . :wiggle:
Message 511 of 1,275
rozza1
Aspirant

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

mdgm wrote:
What is the date of the BIOS on your NAS?

Thanks mdgm

6/10/2010.
I have seen another thread with a bin file to update the bios via an add on. Is this applicable to my version?
Also if that is the correct update can I run it from os 6 or do I need to try to revert to 4, update the bios then reinstall 6.

Thanks
Message 512 of 1,275
mdgm-ntgr
NETGEAR Employee Retired

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

That is the latest BIOS for your NAS: http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=387035#p387035

So no point trying to update it. I could provide instructions again for updating the BIOS on OS 6 (or link to another post) but there is no point in this case.
Message 513 of 1,275
rozza1
Aspirant

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

Thanks. I guess with the ultra 6 bios fan control is not an option.
I think on balance the best solution for me is to change the fan to one with built in thermistor control. I am unsure what numbers in the dashboard system status tab will be reliable to monitor temps but I figure if I pick a high enough performance fan even running quietly it should move more air than the factory crown fan.
I will let you know how I get on.
Message 514 of 1,275
spirit11
Aspirant

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

I have readyNAS 2100v2 and managed to install OS 6.0.8. First thanks to the forum who helped me in installing and making the readynas to run on the latest OS 🙂

I have managed to make Fan Control to work as well for ReadyNAS 2100v2.
/etc/fancontrol details:
# Configuration file generated by pwmconfig, changes will be lost
INTERVAL=10
DEVPATH=hwmon0=devices/platform/coretemp.0 hwmon1=devices/platform/it87.2576
DEVNAME=hwmon0=coretemp hwmon1=it8721
FCTEMPS=hwmon1/device/pwm3=hwmon0/device/temp2_input hwmon1/device/pwm2=hwmon0/device/temp2_input hwmon1/device/pwm1=hwmon0/device/temp2_input
FCFANS=hwmon1/device/pwm3=hwmon1/device/fan2_input hwmon1/device/pwm2=hwmon1/device/fan1_input hwmon1/device/pwm1=
MINTEMP=hwmon1/device/pwm3=51 hwmon1/device/pwm2=51 hwmon1/device/pwm1=51
MAXTEMP=hwmon1/device/pwm3=58 hwmon1/device/pwm2=58 hwmon1/device/pwm1=75
MINSTART=hwmon1/device/pwm3=40 hwmon1/device/pwm2=40 hwmon1/device/pwm1=150
MINSTOP=hwmon1/device/pwm3=40 hwmon1/device/pwm2=40 hwmon1/device/pwm1=0
MINPWM=hwmon1/device/pwm3=40 hwmon1/device/pwm2=40
MAXPWM=hwmon1/device/pwm3=255 hwmon1/device/pwm2=255


I have also managed with the temperature monitoring using this forum help:
crontab entry
*/1 * * * * root /data/Tims/UpdateTemp

UpdateTemp file contents:
#!/bin/sh
#######################################################
Coretemp="/sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/temp2_input"
Systemp="/sys/devices/platform/it87.2576/temp2_input"
Coretemp2="/sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/temp3_input"
Ct=`cat $Coretemp`
C=`expr $Ct / 1000`
Ct2=`cat $Coretemp2`
C2=`expr $Ct2 / 1000`
St=`cat $Systemp`
S=`expr $St / 1000`
rrdtool update /run/readynasd/stats/temperature_int_deg.rrd N:$C:$S


NOW I am struggling with the Volume entries listing correctly under System->Volumes.
I have four HDD, two 2TB HDD and two 1TB HDD, but the display only shows first two disk i.e. two 2TB HDD, other two 1TB HDD is not shown in the UI.
my mtstat.log details:
Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
md126 : active raid1 sdb4[1] sda4[0]
976622784 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]

md127 : active raid5 sda3[0] sdd3[3] sdc3[2] sdb3[1]
2915731968 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU]

md1 : active raid6 sdd2[3] sdc2[2] sdb2[1] sda2[0]
1047936 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU]

md0 : active raid1 sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0]
4192192 blocks super 1.2 [4/4] [UUUU]

unused devices: <none>
/dev/md/1af8fae2:0:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Jul 10 21:57:24 2013
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 4192192 (4.00 GiB 4.29 GB)
Used Dev Size : 4192192 (4.00 GiB 4.29 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Thu Jul 11 11:28:50 2013
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Name : 1af8fae2:0 (local to host 1af8fae2)
UUID : cc72b189:34201546:4b959aa3:a412bb35
Events : 20

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
2 8 33 2 active sync /dev/sdc1
3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1
/dev/md/1af8fae2:1:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Jul 10 21:57:24 2013
Raid Level : raid6
Array Size : 1047936 (1023.55 MiB 1073.09 MB)
Used Dev Size : 523968 (511.77 MiB 536.54 MB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Wed Jul 10 21:59:02 2013
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K

Name : 1af8fae2:1 (local to host 1af8fae2)
UUID : dcdbeca8:0ead7586:185bb8b7:a2eee11c
Events : 18

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/sda2
1 8 18 1 active sync /dev/sdb2
2 8 34 2 active sync /dev/sdc2
3 8 50 3 active sync /dev/sdd2
/dev/md/data-0:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Wed Jul 10 21:57:25 2013
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 2915731968 (2780.66 GiB 2985.71 GB)
Used Dev Size : 971910656 (926.89 GiB 995.24 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Thu Jul 11 11:28:31 2013
State : clean
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K

Name : 1af8fae2:data-0 (local to host 1af8fae2)
UUID : 1dcbc9aa:810af4f8:815edb55:48c86376
Events : 22

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 3 0 active sync /dev/sda3
1 8 19 1 active sync /dev/sdb3
2 8 35 2 active sync /dev/sdc3
3 8 51 3 active sync /dev/sdd3
/dev/md/data-1:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Thu Jul 11 03:57:33 2013
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 976622784 (931.38 GiB 1000.06 GB)
Used Dev Size : 976622784 (931.38 GiB 1000.06 GB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 2
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Thu Jul 11 11:28:01 2013
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Name : 1af8fae2:data-1 (local to host 1af8fae2)
UUID : b664f984:d9820153:aa0e66b0:07df6678
Events : 19

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 4 0 active sync /dev/sda4
1 8 20 1 active sync /dev/sdb4




Thanks for your kind help.
Message 515 of 1,275
noxius
Aspirant

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

Hey,

I have a wired problem.... I have a Ultra 4 with OS 6.... Problem is that approx. after half an hour the frontview is not reachable and I get the message, that the Ultra is not connected and it takes time until it connects again. (Seems Ultra loses connection) The thing is that over ssh the ultra is always reachable also when frontview want start.... I have already preformed a reset and also reinstalled os but with no success, error is still there.... Anyone a clue?? (Maybe sonting with the BIO? I have the old one and can't find any file for update that is .deb only the one in bin which was postet and do not work in os 6...) => The alternative with usb stick and exe file (for downgrade on 4.2) which was postet here somewhere is also a problem since I work on a Macbook Air without windo$....

ps: Sorry for my english i´m from austria....
Message 516 of 1,275
mdgm-ntgr
NETGEAR Employee Retired

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

Are you running the latest version of ReadyNAS OS (currently 6.0.8 )?
Message 517 of 1,275
noxius
Aspirant

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

mdgm wrote:
Are you running the latest version of ReadyNAS OS (currently 6.0.8)?


Yes 6.0.8.....
Message 518 of 1,275
ATCIS
Tutor

Fault tolerance testing continues - Weird Symptoms Prevail

So for any of you who have not been following along, I've been putting a brand new (excess inventory) ReadyNAS Pro through its paces with a fresh install of OS6 version 6.0.8.

About eight posts ago I ended with a list of eleven steps that I either had done or were planning on doing. The conclusion of that little experiment was simple. . . It turned out to be a BAD HARD DRIVE. Even though all the short/quick diagnostic tests I attempted said that the drive was okay the ReadyNAS knew otherwise. Once I resorted to a FULL Diagnostic / Surface Scan the problems eventually came to light. So I set that Hard Drive aside to send back to Western Digital for warranty replacement.

Fortunately I had a spare hard drive of the same brand and model that I could use in place of the newly discovered BAD drive. So, for the past week I have been pushing and pulling Terabytes and Terabytes worth of data to and from this ReadyNAS Pro using different protocols and methods trying to test every possible scenario before putting OS6 into a production environment. I also experimented with some really crazy drive swapping scenarios that I would NEVER attempt in a production environment. All in all, the vast majority of testing went pretty well, until. . . I get this E-Mail out of the blue from the NAS under test:

"Detected increasing ATA error count: [24636] on disk 5 [WDC WD2002FYPS-02W3B0, WD-WCAVY5956816] 2 times in the past 30 days. This condition often indicates an impending failure. Please be prepared to replace this disk to maintain data redundancy."

I'm like "What the Hell?" The distressing thing about the timing of this message is it took place about 20 minutes into a volume expansion experiment that I was performing. You see, all the testing that I was doing previously was with four 2TB Drives (Bays 2,3,4,5 populated. 1 and 6 empty). So I filled the volume with test data to ensure that I would get an alert stating that it was getting full. Once I was satisfied that the volume capacity alerts were working properly, I thought it would be a good time to do a Volume Expansion test. I inserted a fresh drive into Bay 6. Along with the message above I received another that said:

"Disk in channel '5' (Internal) changed state from ONLINE to FAILED."

So I removed the drive from Bay 5 and started a failure diagnosis on it. Here comes the weird part - After doing a FULL diagnostic on the drive with two different tools (to include a full SURFACE SCAN) both diagnostics reported zero errors or problems of any kind. Again I say: What the hell? So I wiped the first and last million sectors of the drive in preparation for reintroduction to the array.

Since performing a full diagnostic on a 2TB drive takes about 5 to 6 hours, the drive that I popped into Bay 6 had finished the integration process. Unfortunately, since the drive that was in Bay 5 failed during a Volume Expansion, the Array as a whole was still considered "Degraded". So, in an attempt to "fool" the ReadyNAS into forgetting about the drive that failed from Bay 5, I shut the unit down and moved the new drive that was in Bay 6 to Bay 5, and powered it back on, waited 15 or 20 minutes and reinserted the alleged "BAD" drive that was originally in Bay 5 into Bay 6. The insertion was detected and this is what I saw on the GUI:



Which leads me to three questions, which are:
1.) Why do you suppose the ReadyNAS thinks that this drive has issues when two different Hard Drive diagnostic programs say otherwise?
2.) Does OS6 have some sort Hard Drive Database that remembers every Hard Drive that has ever been in it?
3.) If number 2 above = YES, is there some way to clear that data so that the ReadyNAS reassess the condition of a particular drive from scratch sometime in the future?

As always. . . Thanks in advance,
Message 519 of 1,275
mdgm-ntgr
NETGEAR Employee Retired

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

1) Have you checked the drive using WD LifeGuard Diagnostics? Have you checked the SMART stats on the disk when it is connected to a PC? An ATA error count of 24638 is huge and does suggest that there is a big problem with the disk.
2) I think that might be the case
3) A factory default (wipes all data, settings, everything) would wipe it. Not sure how else to do so but there probably is a way.
Message 520 of 1,275
ATCIS
Tutor

Fault tolerance testing continues - Weird Symptoms Prevail

Good Lord you're fast! I wasn't even finished proofreading/editing my last post before you sent a reply. . . 🙂

Anyway, my answers are:

mdgm wrote:
1) Have you checked the drive using WD LifeGuard Diagnostics? Have you checked the SMART stats on the disk when it is connected to a PC? An ATA error count of 24638 is huge and does suggest that there is a big problem with the disk.


YES! That was the first tool that I used, which is typically the case when I'm diagnosing Western Digital Hard Drives. The primary reason I even sought a "Second Opinion" was because "LifeGuard Diagnostics" reported that the drive had NO ERRORS of any kind. I concur, 24638 ATA errors is huge! Which is why I think the data may be erroneous.

mdgm wrote:
3) A factory default (wipes all data, settings, everything) would wipe it. Not sure how else to do so but there probably is a way.


Well yeah, I figured that much. . . :roll: I was hoping to avoid that primarily for two reasons:
a.) It takes forever (24+ hours) to rebuild the RAID array from scratch, and. . .
b.) I was afraid that doing so might wipe out all the Fan Speed and Temperature Graphing tweaks that I had done. Not being the Linux expert as many of you are, just having to do those two things over again is a couple of hours of work for me :oops:
Message 521 of 1,275
mdgm-ntgr
NETGEAR Employee Retired

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

Did you check the SMART stats for ATA errors using LifeGuard Diagnostics or another tool?

A factory would wipe all the tweaks you did.
Message 522 of 1,275
ATCIS
Tutor

Fault tolerance testing continues - Weird Symptoms Prevail

mdgm wrote:
Did you check the SMART stats for ATA errors using LifeGuard Diagnostics or another tool?


YES. Both tools reported that the drive was in PERFECT Health.

Check out this screen shot:



The Array rebuild is almost 2/3rds completed and has been running for several hours now. Wouldn't you suppose that if this drive was REALLY BAD, that the ATA errors would have incremented (even slightly) by now? Upon drive insertion the ATA Error count was 24638. I just checked it again three plus hours into the rebuild and it is still at 24638. Doing an Array rebuild is a VERY Disk I/O intensive operation, is it not? Wouldn't you have thought the errors would have increased by now?

:werd:
Message 523 of 1,275
ecalonllc
Aspirant

Re: OS6 now works on x86 Legacy WARNING: NO NTGR SUPPORT!

whelp, after several tries and 3x readynas ultra pro 2; ReadyNAS OS6.0.x is NOT stable for production. i knew it was a bad ideal to try to run it in an production environment. but particularly, after trying multiple times running iscsi lun with mpio connections from multiple hosts, initially after x amount of days the lun would literally drop the filesystem. this is an hyper-v 3.x environment with the lun as an CSV; this happened three times, with the same result.

fortunately i learned a trick to be able to remount the lun as a readable filesystem, and all the data is intact, but any further use would render the filesystem useless again.



having this occur with running VM's is simply not worth the risk. i think there is something inherently wrong with the way iscsi is handle in readynasos6 compared to raidiator 4x for the readynas models. so just a warning to others, please be advise about using iscsi lun on an ultra pro 2;if you have ran into this issue and trying to get your data back from the raw filesystem, message me and i'll help you through it
Message 524 of 1,275
Skywalker
NETGEAR Expert

Re: Fault tolerance testing continues - Weird Symptoms Preva

ATCIS wrote:
Which leads me to three questions, which are:
1.) Why do you suppose the ReadyNAS thinks that this drive has issues when two different Hard Drive diagnostic programs say otherwise?

Diagnostic programs don't pay attention to ATA errors. ATA errors can be caused on some drives by simply sending the drive an invalid command. But we don't expect that to be happening on the ReadyNAS, so ATA error are out of the ordinary. If you have SSH, you can check your SMART data and ATA errors by running these commands:
apt-get install smartmontools
smartctl -a /dev/disk/internal/0:5*

ATCIS wrote:
2.) Does OS6 have some sort Hard Drive Database that remembers every Hard Drive that has ever been in it?
3.) If number 2 above = YES, is there some way to clear that data so that the ReadyNAS reassess the condition of a particular drive from scratch sometime in the future?

From SSH, run this command to reset the error history log:
rm -f /var/readynasd/smart.sq3
Message 525 of 1,275
Top Contributors
Announcements