- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Removed Drive (Degraded Volume). Will It Balance?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I purposefully removed one of the drives from my RN316 because I am transitioning to a newer server and need the drives. My RN316 now has a "degraded volume." My question is, will the RN316 eventually spread out the data evenly among the remaining 5 drives (given that there is plenty of space on the entire volume) to eventually become a redundant array again? Or, is there a way I can force this?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@StephenB wrote:
@MathemAddicts wrote:My question is, will the RN316 eventually spread out the data evenly among the remaining 5 drives (given that there is plenty of space on the entire volume) to eventually become a redundant array again?
No.
Well, actually yes. It will spread the data out among the drives of the non-redundant array. It will not re-structure the RAID to use only the remaining drives and regain redundancy (and lose capacity), which is what @StephenB thinks you really mean (and you probably do).
All Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Removed Drive (Degraded Volume). Will It Balance?
@MathemAddicts wrote:
My question is, will the RN316 eventually spread out the data evenly among the remaining 5 drives (given that there is plenty of space on the entire volume) to eventually become a redundant array again?
No.
@MathemAddicts wrote:
Or, is there a way I can force this?
It can be done with SSH, and there are some posts here that outline the process.
It's not something you should attempt w/o a full backup of the files.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@StephenB wrote:
@MathemAddicts wrote:My question is, will the RN316 eventually spread out the data evenly among the remaining 5 drives (given that there is plenty of space on the entire volume) to eventually become a redundant array again?
No.
Well, actually yes. It will spread the data out among the drives of the non-redundant array. It will not re-structure the RAID to use only the remaining drives and regain redundancy (and lose capacity), which is what @StephenB thinks you really mean (and you probably do).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Removed Drive (Degraded Volume). Will It Balance?
Okay, so in any case, the only way to regain redundancy is to insert another drive, correct? Does it have to be a drive of the same size as was removed (6 TB)? Or can I insert a smaller drive (1.5 TB) and still get redundancy? Note: I have only used 10 TB of the 36 TB originally in the server.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Removed Drive (Degraded Volume). Will It Balance?
@MathemAddicts wrote:
Does it have to be a drive of the same size as was removed (6 TB)? Or can I insert a smaller drive (1.5 TB) and still get redundancy?
It has to be the same size or larger.
RAID creates a virtual disk that the file system users. The RAID itself works the same way no matter how much free space there is file system.
FWIW, your data and parity blocks are already evenly spread across the drives (as are the RAID parity blocks). The missing data (from the drive you removed) is being reconstructed on-the-fly from the remaining blocks. That will reduce your performance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Removed Drive (Degraded Volume). Will It Balance?
@MathemAddicts wrote:Note: I have only used 10 TB of the 36 TB originally in the server.
Which is why initially filling the NAS is not a wise move unless you really need all the space right away. Too late on this one, but not on the replacement. As @StephenB said, the data is spread over all the drives, there aren't unused, idle ones. So, they all get hours of use on them and can fail at similar times. Adding drives as they are needed means the added ones are newer (and likely less expensive by the time you need them). It's one of the big advantages of XRAID over other RAID implementations.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Removed Drive (Degraded Volume). Will It Balance?
Got it. I will only use two drives in the new NAS and reserve the other four for later expansion. Thank you.