× NETGEAR will be terminating ReadyCLOUD service by July 1st, 2023. For more details click here.
Orbi WiFi 7 RBE973
Reply

Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

PeteC2017
Aspirant

Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

on one of our ReadyNAS 4312 after a reboot all the disk in the Raid 5 are showing as inactive.  nothing has been written to the NAS.  Isa there a way to bring the drives on line and recover the data ?

Message 1 of 13

Accepted Solutions
StephenB
Guru

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot


@PeteC2017 wrote:

it looks like some sort of OS issue, I cannot add SHH servicers.


Have you been able to download the log zip file?

View solution in original post

Message 5 of 13

All Replies
StephenB
Guru

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot


@PeteC2017 wrote:

on one of our ReadyNAS 4312 after a reboot all the disk in the Raid 5 are showing as inactive.  nothing has been written to the NAS.  Isa there a way to bring the drives on line and recover the data ?


There might be, it depends on what went wrong.

 

Do you know what happened (powerfail, disk failure, etc)?

Message 2 of 13
PeteC2017
Aspirant

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

a disk failure # 4 drive

Message 3 of 13
PeteC2017
Aspirant

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

it looks like some sort of OS issue, I cannot add SHH servicers.

Message 4 of 13
StephenB
Guru

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot


@PeteC2017 wrote:

it looks like some sort of OS issue, I cannot add SHH servicers.


Have you been able to download the log zip file?

Message 5 of 13
PeteC2017
Aspirant

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

yes 

 

Message 6 of 13
StephenB
Guru

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot


@PeteC2017 wrote:

yes 

 


You should be able sort out what happened by looking at system.log, kernel.log, and systemd-journal.log.  A single disk failure should have mounted ok, something must have happened to at least one other disk (possibly just out of sync).

Message 7 of 13
PeteC2017
Aspirant

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

how would I resync them

 

Message 8 of 13
PeteC2017
Aspirant

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

How would I get pass the error when enabling SSH?

Message 9 of 13
StephenB
Guru

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot


@PeteC2017 wrote:

How would I get pass the error when enabling SSH?


It is possible to boot up in tech support mode, and then connect with telnet (using backdoor credentials).

 

From there you can mount the OS partition, and examine the data volume.

 

If the volume is simply out-of-sync, then you'd assemble it using --force or --really-force, and then mount it.  There could be some data loss (since if it is out of sync, there are lost writes), but often not much (if any).

 

If a second disk has failed, then it becomes much more difficult - I'd recommend using raid recovery software in that case.  The drives would need to be connected to a PC in that scenario.  Alternatively you could contract with a data recovery service.

Message 10 of 13
NiveditaP
NETGEAR Moderator

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

Hello @PeteC2017 

 

Could you please look into the disk logs , if ATA Error count is greater than 0 then it seems your drive have gone faulty.

Also, if you are using Raid 5 then the NAS should work with 3 drives.

 

Have a lovely day, 
Nivedita Pa
Netgear Team 

Message 11 of 13
Sandshark
Sensei

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot

ATA errors are not always due to the drive.  SMART can't determine if it's the hardware on the drive side, the NAS (PC, etc.) side, or even another drive on a companion SATA bus.  I had an EDA500 on which the eSATA cable became loose, and the result was dozens of ATA errors before the volume was corrupted and went read-only.

Message 12 of 13
StephenB
Guru

Re: Volumes now showing inactive after reboot


@Sandshark wrote:

ATA errors are not always due to the drive.  


Agreed. And a non-zero ATA count doesn't necessarily mean the drive needs to be replaced.  I've seen cases where drive X has failed to respond to a command, and an ATA error was then reported on Drive Y.  I'm thinking that the SATA bus ended up hung, and that the OS couldn't figure out what drive was at fault.

 

In this case @PeteC2017 says there was one failed drive though, so I do agree that looking at the smart stats (and the other logs) was the right next step. I said that earlier in the thread.

 

In any event, the posts are quite stale (2 months old), so I don't why the mod decided to reply now.

Message 13 of 13
Top Contributors
Discussion stats
  • 12 replies
  • 2146 views
  • 0 kudos
  • 4 in conversation
Announcements