Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
X-RAID2 or Raid 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-01-24
07:32 AM
2011-01-24
07:32 AM
X-RAID2 or Raid 1
Hello All,
I have 2 drives inside a ReadyNAS Ultra 2 Plus running 4.2.15.
My requirement is that if 1 drive fails the data would still be in tact and I would just replace the failed drive to become redundant again.
Expansion is not really important to me I am after redundancy.
Which is better Raid 1 or X-RAID2?
TIA
I have 2 drives inside a ReadyNAS Ultra 2 Plus running 4.2.15.
My requirement is that if 1 drive fails the data would still be in tact and I would just replace the failed drive to become redundant again.
Expansion is not really important to me I am after redundancy.
Which is better Raid 1 or X-RAID2?
TIA
Message 1 of 8
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-01-25
02:19 AM
2011-01-25
02:19 AM
Re: X-RAID2 or Raid 1
Both can do what you want. I'd suggest sticking with X-RAID2.
As of 4.2.16 both of these options will be expandable not just X-RAID2. Assuming you have e.g. 2x2TB disks in the NAS you will need to replace both disks with higher capacity disks (e.g. 2x3TB disks, 4.2.16 is required to support 3TB disks) to get expansion as expansion can only take place when redundant space can be added.
While expansion may not be important to you now, I expect it will be in a few years time.
As of 4.2.16 both of these options will be expandable not just X-RAID2. Assuming you have e.g. 2x2TB disks in the NAS you will need to replace both disks with higher capacity disks (e.g. 2x3TB disks, 4.2.16 is required to support 3TB disks) to get expansion as expansion can only take place when redundant space can be added.
While expansion may not be important to you now, I expect it will be in a few years time.
Message 2 of 8
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-01-26
07:59 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-07-29
05:38 AM
2011-07-29
05:38 AM
Re: X-RAID2 or Raid 1
Hello,
Could someone explain me the last moment of this presentation: http://www.readynas.com/?p=656
Why the redundancy capacity increased to 1.5TB ?
Could someone explain me the last moment of this presentation: http://www.readynas.com/?p=656
Why the redundancy capacity increased to 1.5TB ?
Message 4 of 8
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-07-29
05:44 AM
2011-07-29
05:44 AM
Re: X-RAID2 or Raid 1
The volume can only expand when redundant storage can be added. So that if any single disk fails data remains intact the capacity of the largest disk is used for redundancy.
Message 5 of 8
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-07-29
08:27 AM
2011-07-29
08:27 AM
Re: X-RAID2 or Raid 1
http://www.readynas.com/?p=656
.. why the redundancy capacity increased to 1.5TB ?
.. why the redundancy capacity increased to 1.5TB ?
Message 6 of 8
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-07-29
08:40 AM
2011-07-29
08:40 AM
Re: X-RAID2 or Raid 1
In a fully redundant X-RAID setup, the amount of redundancy required is always equal to the largest single disk installed - in the example you show, that means 1.5TB once the 2 x 1.5TB HDDs are installed
Message 7 of 8
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-07-29
12:36 PM
2011-07-29
12:36 PM
Re: X-RAID2 or Raid 1
Thank you for explanation.
I watched the presentation few more times and I'm close to understood 🙂
I watched the presentation few more times and I'm close to understood 🙂
Message 8 of 8