Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
WN2000RPT is slower than WNR3500L
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-09-10
03:20 PM
2011-09-10
03:20 PM
WN2000RPT is slower than WNR3500L
WN2000RPT is connected via wifi to WNR3500L. WNR3500L is upstairs, and WN2000RPT is downstairs, using WPA-PSK.
I'm downstairs with my laptop and connect to WNR3500L via wifi and run speedtest.net
24 meg down ; 4 meg up.
Now I disconnect from the upstairs WNR3500L and connect to the downstairs WN2000RPT which is only 5 feet away from my laptop.
9 meg down ; 4 meg up.
What happened to my download speeds? I bought the WN2000RPT so that I can connect my bluray player to it via ethernet because my bluray player does not have wifi built in. The description on the box says the WN2000RPT is what is needed for that setup.. and I can even connect other devices (consoles etc..). Did I buy the correct device? What can I try to speed up my download via WN2000RPT before giving up and trying a different device?
Thanks.
I'm downstairs with my laptop and connect to WNR3500L via wifi and run speedtest.net
24 meg down ; 4 meg up.
Now I disconnect from the upstairs WNR3500L and connect to the downstairs WN2000RPT which is only 5 feet away from my laptop.
9 meg down ; 4 meg up.
What happened to my download speeds? I bought the WN2000RPT so that I can connect my bluray player to it via ethernet because my bluray player does not have wifi built in. The description on the box says the WN2000RPT is what is needed for that setup.. and I can even connect other devices (consoles etc..). Did I buy the correct device? What can I try to speed up my download via WN2000RPT before giving up and trying a different device?
Thanks.
Message 1 of 5
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-09-10
08:32 PM
2011-09-10
08:32 PM
Re: WN2000RPT is slower than WNR3500L
9 meg down ; 4 meg up.
did you test with pc wired the lan ports of extender or connect to extender with wifi?
test both ways
Message 2 of 5
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-09-12
01:23 AM
2011-09-12
01:23 AM
Re: WN2000RPT is slower than WNR3500L
jmizoguchi wrote: did you test with pc wired the lan ports of extender or connect to extender with wifi?
test both ways
That was for extender with wifi. So now I justed tested my laptop connected via ethernet to the lan ports of the extender. Wow, the lag is gone?? Its fast! Its 23 meg down ; 4 meg up. I don't get it. Hmm.. should I try changing my wifi channels on my extender since the extender wifi is the one with lag? Any other wifi configs I should try on my extender?
Message 3 of 5
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-09-12
07:33 AM
2011-09-12
07:33 AM
Re: WN2000RPT is slower than WNR3500L
When you use wireless extending, or to call it by it's correct name, wireless repeating, there will always be a drop in throughput, expect no more than 50% throughput per repeater. so if you have a single repeater, you'll see at best 50% of your available throughput, with two repeaters that will drop to 25%, and so on.
Wireless repeating should be used only as a last resort.
Wireless repeating should be used only as a last resort.
Message 4 of 5
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2011-09-12
10:51 AM
2011-09-12
10:51 AM
Re: WN2000RPT is slower than WNR3500L
same answer here... from the SSID extender signal you will loose 50% of 9Mbps is not exact half but correctly showing for wifi while the pc suing ethernet showing 23Mbps
Message 5 of 5
Announcements
• What is the difference between WiFi 6 and WiFi 7?
• Yes! WiFi 7 is backwards compatible with other Wifi devices? Learn more