NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

Bal-'s avatar
Bal-
Guide
Mar 30, 2021

WiFi 6E Problems - RAXE500

I've recently configured my Netgear RAXE500 router and experiencing issues with very slow speeds and low signal with Wi-Fi 6E and I'm unable to authenticate with WPA3-Personal using the Intel AX210 module (The only desktop device that supports Wi-Fi 6E)

 

Setup

 

  • Netgear RAXE500
  • CM1100 Cable Modem connected to WAN/port1 (LAG 2x 1GbE)
  • Windows 10 Desktop PC 1GbE
  • DS420+ NAS (LAG 2x 1GbE) on ports 3/4 
  • Windows 10 Desktop PC (W10 Pro 21H1) w/ Intel AX210 Wireless Module (PCIe) (driver 22.30.0.11)

 

Problem #1

 

Unable to authenticate with 6Ghz band using WPA3-Personal. This is concerning since it's the only security available for the 6Ghz band. Intel says Windows 10 doesn't support WPA3 until the next update, even though their literature says the module is fully Windows 10 compatible and Microsoft says Windows 10 supports WPA3. I call hogwash on that since I'm running the "next" update 21H1 (beta) and it still doesn't work. I highly suspect this is an issue with the AX210 driver (I can't get WPA3 to authenticate in Ubuntu 20.10 w/Linux 5.10 kernel either) since it's (very poorly) working with the Samsung S21 Ultra but I do not understand why we have no WPA2 option on the RAXE500.

 

"netsh wlan show drivers" shows that WPA3-Personal is supported by the Intel AX210 driver...

 

There are multiple posts on Intel's forums about this, no real answers, and nobody seems to have this issue on the Samsung S21 Ultra, including myself.

 

 

Problem #2

 

Very low signal and very slow speeds on the 6GHz band compared to the 2.4/5 GHz AX bands. When connecting with the 6Ghz band using "Enhanced Open" (the only option that will let me connect), I get slower than 2.4GHz WiFi 6 speeds MOST of the time and have yet to see it surpass the 5GHz Wi-Fi 6 speeds at all.

 

The RAXE500 is mounted 4 inches below the ceiling with antennas unfolded approximately 20' away, line of sight from the desktop antennaes in my office.

I've tried 4 different antennas from the stock ones PCIe adapter antennas to 9" aftermarket mounted 4" below the ceiling and have had no change in results on the wifi (although the 9"-inchers allow bluetooth to work halfway down the block, so that's cool.).

 

The 6GHz signal fluctuates from 40-60% while 2.4 / 5GHz are sitting at 100%.

 

I've tested all manner of switching channels, disabling other radios, etc. Nothing makes a difference, the 6GHz signal is just very weak.

 

I cannot solely place blame on Netgear for the signal issues here (the several bugs I experienced in the RAXE500 management portal are another story) since I'm also experiencing this same low-signal behavior with the ASUS GT-AXE11000's Wi-Fi 6E 6GHz band. Surely this behavior was seen during testing by all 4 manufacturers involved (Intel, Broadcom, Netgear, and Asus) since there are several dozen similar reports from consumers experiencing the same issues with Wi-Fi 6E. Why is the Wi-Fi 6E 6GHz technology being marketed (By Netgear, and others) as faster than Wi-Fi 6 5GhZ, having better signal range, and more secure when the most common use case (Windows 10 with an AX210 Intel Wireless Module) currently fail in all of those areas?

 

Wi-Fi 6 2.4GHz 

  • Link speed (r/t):
    • 258/244
  • Signal: -44dBm
  • Transfer Rate (iperf3): 
    • [SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 165 MBytes 138 Mbits/sec sender
      [SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 164 MBytes 137 Mbits/sec receiver
  • Transfer Rate (speedtest.net d/u)
    • 140.88/ 35.03

 

Wi-Fi 6 5GHz

  • Link speed (r/t):
    • 1922/865
  • Signal: -58dBm
  • Transfer Rate (iperf3): 
    • [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 544 MBytes 457 Mbits/sec sender
      [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 543 MBytes 456 Mbits/sec receiver
  • Transfer Rate (speedtest.net d/u)
    • 476.46 / 34.99

Wi-Fi 6E 6GHz

  • Link speed (r/t): 
    • 576/103
  • Signal: -82dBm
  • Transfer Rate (iperf3): 
    • [SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 56.2 MBytes 47.1 Mbits/sec sender
      [SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 55.1 MBytes 46.2 Mbits/sec receiver
  • Transfer Rate (speedtest.net d/u)
    • 232.62 / 7.97

 

Hopefully these issues will be resolved in time, as with any new technology, but for now I can say the cost and hassle of Wi-Fi 6E is not at all worth it for the slow speeds and connectivity issues I've experienced thus far. Any suggestions are appreciated.

44 Replies

  • Hello Netgear Community!

     

    I wonder if things got any better these days?

     

    Can someone confirm I can use Windows 10 PC with this Fenvi FV-AXE3000 Wi-Fi 6E AX210, Bluetooth 5,2, PCIExpress adapter

    And this RAXE500 router to get full Wifi6E experience?

    I know that AX210 has only 2x2 TX/RX Streams; Bands 2.4Ghz, 5Ghz, 6Ghz, (160Mhz) would I be able to use its full potential with RAXE500?

     

    Is there a way to unlock power for 6Hz LPI power restrictions if router is used outside the US?

    • Razor512's avatar
      Razor512
      Prodigy

      Forgot to mention that Some WiFi adapters will determine region and apply local regulations based on beacons sent by nearby APs, thus there is a chance that even if yor RAXE500 will broadcast on the 6GHz band, the AX210 may refuse to use it if it automatically switches regions.

       

      Currently the 2 streams is the max for WiFi client devices (unless you do something like a wireles bridge between 2 RAXE500 devices).

      With a 2400Mbps PHY rate, the real world throughput ends up being in the 1.8Gbps to 2Gbps under good conditions with an Intel AX210.

       

      • petru44o's avatar
        petru44o
        Aspirant

        Forgot to mention that Some WiFi adapters will determine region and apply local regulations based on beacons sent by nearby APs

         

        Is there any understanding of how to choose AX210 card that does not use LAR (system that does what you described, as I understand)?

        Is this detection of the region mechanism present on every intel ax210? Any tips how to avoid that?

        Is this related to usage of the AX210 in the laptop or PCI to m2 usage in desktop is also vunerable to region determination? Thing is I wanted to test it in country, where 6Ghz is not yet certified.

    • Razor512's avatar
      Razor512
      Prodigy

      Under windows 11, the 6GHz band will work normally, but for windows 10, it is an issue since Microsoft released an update that broke 6GHz support again.

       

    • FURRYe38's avatar
      FURRYe38
      Guru

      I would review this:

      https://community.netgear.com/t5/Nighthawk-Routers-with-WiFi-6-AX/RAXE500-Beta-FW-v1-0-9-72-is-available-for-Testing/m-p/2163843/highlight/true#M22689

       

      I haven't had a chance to check my PC again with newer FW. Been busy playing with other items. :smileywink:


      petru44o wrote:

      Hello Netgear Community!

       

      I wonder if things got any better these days?

       

      Can someone confirm I can use Windows 10 PC with this Fenvi FV-AXE3000 Wi-Fi 6E AX210, Bluetooth 5,2, PCIExpress adapter

      And this RAXE500 router to get full Wifi6E experience?

      I know that AX210 has only 2x2 TX/RX Streams; Bands 2.4Ghz, 5Ghz, 6Ghz, (160Mhz) would I be able to use its full potential with RAXE500?

       

      Is there a way to unlock power for 6Hz LPI power restrictions if router is used outside the US?


       

      • martyr444's avatar
        martyr444
        Apprentice

        I'm using the latest Netgear Beta Firmware for the RAXE500. I have never been able to get the SSID to show up for my Intel AX210 unless I use a hacked driver dated back to April 2021 by Dong. I also use the latest Intel AX210 Driver and still no show unless I use that hacked driver. I'm on the latest version of Windows 10 insider version 21H2 (OS Build 19044.1503).

  • I just tried with Windows 11 and AX210 driver 22.60.0.6 and WPA3 still doesn't work.

    • martyr444's avatar
      martyr444
      Apprentice

      They keep saying by the end of the year.............waiting waiting waiting

      • Razor512's avatar
        Razor512
        Prodigy

        Sadly it seems Microsoft is more interested in giving Windows 11 a worse UI that eastes more vertical and horizontal screen space, rather than pushing out the major update for windows 10 that includes the full WPA 3 support.

  • For your desktop PC with the AX210, are you using antennas connected by a long coax cable? if so, then the signal loss over the length of the cable is really harmful to 6GHz band, especially since the FCC intially really crippled the 6GHz band, though the WiFi industry is working to get the FCC to be more reasonable.

     

    One of the main issues with the FCC limitation is the transmit power limits. On 160MHz channel width, there is a cap of 250mW for the AP and 127mW for the client device, but that does not mean that you will always be at that limit, since they further impose another gut punch of PSD.

     

    PS, at 80MHz channel width, the transmit power due to the restrictions, are cut in half for both the client and AP (and arefurther halved at 40MHz, and 20MHz)

     

     

     

    The limitations, if paired with a long cable, or worse, an antenna that is not well suited for the 6GHz band in addition to a long coax cable causing a 5+ dB  drop in signal strength of what is already a heavily limited transmit power.

     

    These are all things that will improve over time as the FCC loosens some of the restrictions, and WiFi AP and client devices release firmware updates to take advantage of looser restrictions, as the hardware is highly capable.

    For the desktop setups the main isue that I have seen are from companies selling the adapters with a very basic 2 stream antenna, and a really long coax.

     

     

    They end up suffering so much line loss that they struggle on 6Gz and even 5GHz DFS channels.

     

     

    Aside from that, Windows 10 currently does not have full WPA3 support on the 6GHz band unless you go with a beta/insider build of Windows 10, though that update will make its way to the mainstream builds once everything is confirmed stable.

  • Thank you to all that replied to my original post!

     

    plemans  comments regarding FCC restrictions..."In terms of speeds, its an issue with LPI (low-power indoor) and the basic usage of how 6ghz works. Like 2.4ghz can penetrate further and though more materials than 5ghz, the 5ghz can do more than 6ghz.

     

    As I understand it, the FCC's Low Power Indoor designation for 6GHz is not intended to mean lower power (signal) than existing (2.4GHz / 5GHz) indoor home devices. The LPI designation is a way to differentiate home use from outdoor commercial applications (such as Outdoor AP's or Point-to-Point devices, Emergency systems). If you look at the LPI power restrictions for the 6GHz band, they're identical to the current 5GHz designations, so I do not believe that should be a factor here..

     

    6GHz Low-Power (indoor only)
    Maximum Conducted Power: 24 (dBm)
    Maximum EIRP: 30 (dBm)
    Maximum Spectral Density EIRP: 17 (dBm\MHz)

     

    My AX210 Antenna is about 20 feet in line of sight of the access point (indoors), so the only material it has to go through is the air. In addition to that, the 6GHz band is specifically advertised as "Reduce congestion and interference". If 20' of air with no other 6GHz devices is considered congestion or interference for a wireless device, I don't know what to say to that. 

     

    If I'm wrong, and the FCC is removing some restriction on transmit power, does that mean Wi-Fi 6E devices can be updated with firmware, or would that require new hardware?

     

    Here are some quotes from the literature on the box and website advertising the RAXE500 and WiFi 6E. None of these statements would indicate to a consumer the 6GHz band on the RAXE500 (or WiFi 6E in general) is designed to be lower power/signal and/or slower than 5GHz.

     

    RAXE500 Box

    "Recommended for a 5-6 bedroom home" - (I think this was supposed to say tent-home, or a homeless encampment, perhaps)

     

    Under "WiFi 6-Expanded":

    "Dedicated WiFi for new devices"
    "Smoothest & fastest streaming, gaming & video conferencing"
    "Enjoy top speeds for all your devices"


    Under "Cutting Edge Performance":

    "New 6GHz WiFi Band** - Enjoy faster speed and less congestion with over 200% more available spectrum than dual-band (5GHz & 2.4GHz) WiFi alone."
    The ** says "Clients must support 6GHz band (WiFi 6E)."
    "Ultra Low Latency - Very few devices on the 6GHz band means lower latency for gaming and real-time traffic".
    "More High Bandwidth WiFi Channels - Blazing fast speed and less interference with 3X more high-bandwidth 160Mhz WiFi channels."
    RAXE500 Product Page

     

    Under "WiFi 6E Stands Alone - Open an Exclusive New Path to the Future of WiFi"

    "Reduce congestion and interference"


    RAXE500 Data Sheet - RAXE500_DS_11Mar21_tcm148-119463.pdf

     

    Under "Wifi 6E: Expanding WiFi with New Speeds"

    "Nighthawk® RAXE500 Tri-Band WiFi 6E Router is powered by WiFi 6E, delivering the smoothest and fastest streaming, eLearning,
    video conferencing, and gaming experience. Now you can have all the power of 6th generation WiFi plus expanded speeds, connections, and capacity with a completely new and wider 6GHz WiFi band that has up to 3.5X more WiFi channels."
    "Plus, eight high-performance antennas on the router amplify WiFi signals for maximized range and reliable coverage for a 5-6 bedroom home."
    Introducing WiFi 6E, delivering the smoothest and fastest streaming, eLearning, video conferencing, and gaming experience. Now you can have all the power of 6th-generation WiFi plus expanded speeds, connections, and capacity thanks to a completely new and wider 6GHz WiFi band with more WiFi channels.
    New 6GHz WiFi Band—Exclusive access for only devices supporting the new 6GHz band means less congestion and faster speed
    More Spectrum—Up to 200% more spectrum than dual band (2.4GHz & 5GHz) WiFi to WiFi 6E devices
    More High-Bandwidth WiFi Channels—Up to 3.5X more high-bandwidth 160MHz WiFi channels for applications such as your
    8K video streaming 
    Ultra-Low Latency—Less traffic on the 6GHz band gives you lower latency for your AR/VR gaming and other WiFi-intense applications
    Cutting-Edge WPA3 Security—The latest WiFi security protocol to keep your family and network safe
    Under WiFi Range - Faster and expanded coverage throughout your home and for all your devices.

    ULTIMATE RANGE - WiFi coverage throughout very large homes


    Topology 

     

    [1] Is the LAG connection between the router and the CM1100 modem working well?
    Yes, is seems to be working just fine. My Internet bandwidth is capped at 1gbps dows so I cannot tell if it's truly using all of the bandwidth, but thus far I have not had any disconnects or loss of the link aggregation on either the modem or router side.
    [2] Is the LAG connection between the router and the Synology DS420+ working well?  Is the performance of the NAS noticeably improved as a result?
    Yes here as well, the Synology NAS created the bond without issue and the connection has not dropped once. When using the 2.5GBPS LAN port the write speed sits around 1890mbps, so that is quite an improvement over the 900ish mbps I was receiving before aggregation with a single LAN. I do have 2 Samsung 980 Pro NVMe drives in the NAS in addition to the 4x 10tb IronWolfs so that may be helping with write speeds too. Wireless is slower than that, as expected, but still not bad on the 5GHz AX.
    Thus far have no issues or complaints with the speed of the Wired connection or the Wi-Fi 2.4/5GHz AX bands. My only issue here is with the 6GHz band signal/performance and being unable to connect securely.

     

    avtellaregarding WPA / SAE....

     

    According to the latest (1/28/2021) WiFi Alliance certification for the AX210, it's listed as supporting WPA3-Personal and WPA3-Enterprise with Windows 10, version 2004 on the 6GHz band. Intel also has the AX210 listed on it's list of devices that support WPA3 on Windows 10

    WPA3-Personal:
    Intel® Wireless adapters fully support WPA3-Personal using Windows® 10 May 2019 version 1903 Update or later, and Wi-Fi driver 21.10.X or later.
    WPA3-Enterprise:
    Intel® Wireless adapters fully support WPA3-Enterprise using Windows® 10 May 2020 version 2004 Update or later, and Wi-Fi driver 21.90.3.X or later.
    According to Microsoft, they have supported WPA3-SAE as of WDI 0.1.1.8.

     

    Running "netsh wlan show wirelesscapabilities" (Windows 10 Pro 10.0.19043 Build 19043 21H1) shows both SAE and OWE are supported. SAE is supported in Linux, but I have the same authentication issue there as well (OWE works).

     

    WDI Version (Windows) : 0.1.1.9

    WDI Version (IHV) : 0.1.1.9

    SAE Authentication : Supported
    OWE Authentication : Supported

     

    Here's an output of the connection log, it does show Wireless security succeeded then all of a sudden Wireless security stops. Strange, but does seem to indicate some sort of Windows / Driver issue.

     

     

     

    As I type this, I just got notification Intel officially released driver 22.40.0.7 for the AX210. When it installed through Windows Update a few days ago I got a BSOD and had to roll back, but about to try it again and hope for the best....

     

    Update: This is the third time attempting to post this today, so all of my formatting and links are gone (sorry)...  If anyone did see my original reply, I did install the latest Intel driver 22.40.0.7 that I was notified about today. No blue screens this time but still unable to connect to WPA3.

     

     

     

    • Bal-'s avatar
      Bal-
      Guide

      As of 06/14/21 - Wi-Fi 6E WPA3 is still not functional on Intel AX210 driver 22.60.0.6 and Windows 10 21H1 19043.1055

       

       

    • avtella's avatar
      avtella
      Prodigy

      WPA3 on 6Ghz has extra requirements... It requires Hash to Element (H2E).

       

      Everything you listed only refers to the standard WPA3, thats already available on most AX devices and does not require H2E on 2.4 Ghz  and 5 Ghz. H2E is not available in Windows 10 1903... You need 21H1.

      • pdegan2814's avatar
        pdegan2814
        Tutor

        Once 21H1 was available, I updated my AX210 to the 22.50 drivers(available as an optional update in Win10), and tried to set up the 6GHz band for WPA3. It still would not work. Honestly, at this point I'm ready to take engineers from Netgear, Intel and Microsoft and lock them in a room until they can come up with a consensus of what still needs updating.

  • Thank you to all that replied to my original post!

     

    To address plemans comments regarding FCC restrictions..."In terms of speeds, its an issue with LPI (low-power indoor) and the basic usage of how 6ghz works. Like 2.4ghz can penetrate further and though more materials than 5ghz, the 5ghz can do more than 6ghz. "

     

    As I understand it, the FCC's Low Power Indoor designation for 6GHz is not intended to mean lower power (signal) than existing (2.4GHz / 5GHz) indoor home devices. The LPI designation is a way to differentiate home use from outdoor commercial applications (such as Outdoor AP's or Point-to-Point devices, Emergency systems). If you look at the LPI power restrictions for the 6GHz band, they're identical to the current 5GHz designations, so I do not believe that should be a factor here..

     

    6GHz Low-Power (indoor only)
    Maximum Conducted Power: 24 (dBm)
    Maximum EIRP: 30 (dBm)
    Maximum Spectral Density EIRP: 17 (dBm\MHz)

     

    My AX210 Antenna is about 20 feet in line of sight of the access point (indoors), so the only material it has to go through is the air. In addition to that, the 6GHz band is specifically advertised as "Reduce congestion and interference". If 20' of air with no other 6GHz devices is considered congestion or interference for an access point, I don't know what to say to that. 

     

    If I'm wrong, and the FCC is removing some restriction on transmit power, does that mean Wi-Fi 6E devices can be updated with firmware, or would that require new hardware?

     

    Here are some quotes from the literature on the box and website advertising the RAXE500 and WiFi 6E. None of these statements would indicate to a consumer the 6GHz band on the RAXE500 (or WiFi 6E in general) is designed to be lower power/signal and/or slower than 5GHz.

     

    RAXE500 Box

    "Recommended for a 5-6 bedroom home" - (I think this was supposed to say tent-home, or a homeless encampment, perhaps)

     

    Under "WiFi 6-Expanded":

    • Dedicated WiFi for new devices
    • Smoothest & fastest streaming, gaming & video conferencing
    • Enjoy top speeds for all your devices


    Under "Cutting Edge Performance":

    • New 6GHz WiFi Band** - Enjoy faster speed and less congestion with over 200% more available spectrum than dual-band (5GHz & 2.4GHz) WiFi alone."The ** says "Clients must support 6GHz band (WiFi 6E).
    • Ultra Low Latency - Very few devices on the 6GHz band means lower latency for gaming and real-time traffic.
    • More High Bandwidth WiFi Channels - Blazing fast speed and less interference with 3X more high-bandwidth 160Mhz WiFi channels.

    RAXE500 Product Page

     

    Under "WiFi 6E Stands Alone - Open an Exclusive New Path to the Future of WiFi"

    • Reduce congestion and interference


    RAXE500 Data Sheet - RAXE500_DS_11Mar21_tcm148-119463.pdf

     

    Under "Wifi 6E: Expanding WiFi with New Speeds"

    • Nighthawk® RAXE500 Tri-Band WiFi 6E Router is powered by WiFi 6E, delivering the smoothest and fastest streaming, eLearning,
      video conferencing, and gaming experience. Now you can have all the power of 6th generation WiFi plus expanded speeds, connections, and capacity with a completely new and wider 6GHz WiFi band that has up to 3.5X more WiFi channels.
    • Plus, eight high-performance antennas on the router amplify WiFi signals for maximized range and reliable coverage for a 5-6 bedroom home.
    • Introducing WiFi 6E, delivering the smoothest and fastest streaming, eLearning, video conferencing, and gaming experience. Now you can have all the power of 6th-generation WiFi plus expanded speeds, connections, and capacity thanks to a completely new and wider 6GHz WiFi band with more WiFi channels.
    • New 6GHz WiFi Band—Exclusive access for only devices supporting the new 6GHz band means less congestion and faster speed
      More Spectrum—Up to 200% more spectrum than dual band (2.4GHz & 5GHz) WiFi to WiFi 6E devices
      More High-Bandwidth WiFi Channels—Up to 3.5X more high-bandwidth 160MHz WiFi channels for applications such as your
      8K video streaming 
    • Ultra-Low Latency—Less traffic on the 6GHz band gives you lower latency for your AR/VR gaming and other WiFi-intense applications
      Cutting-Edge WPA3 Security—The latest WiFi security protocol to keep your family and network safe
      Under WiFi Range - Faster and expanded coverage throughout your home and for all your devices.
    • ULTIMATE RANGE - WiFi coverage throughout very large homes


    To address Topology  's questions....

     

    • [1] Is the LAG connection between the router and the CM1100 modem working well?
      • Yes, seems to be working just fine. My Internet bandwidth is capped at 1gbps dows so I cannot tell if it's truly using all of the bandwidth, but thus far I have not had any disconnects or loss of the link aggregation on either the modem or router side.
    • [2] Is the LAG connection between the router and the Synology DS420+ working well?  Is the performance of the NAS noticeably improved as a result?
      • Yes here as well, the Synology NAS created the bond without issue and the connection has not dropped once. When using the 2.5GBPS LAN port the write speed sits around 1890mbps, so that is quite an improvement over the 900ish mbps I was receiving before aggregation with a single LAN. I do have 2 Samsung 980 Pro NVMe drives in the NAS in addition to the 4x 10tb IronWolfs so that may be helping with write speeds too. Wireless is slower than that, as expected, but still not bad on the 5GHz AX. Thus far have no issues or complaints with the speed of the Wired connection or the Wi-Fi 2.4/5GHz AX bands. My only issue here is with the 6GHz band signal/performance and being unable to connect securely.

     

    To address avtella's comment regarding WPA / SAE....

     

    According to the latest (1/28/2021) WiFi Alliance certification for the AX210, it's listed as supporting WPA3-Personal and WPA3-Enterprise with Windows 10, version 2004 on the 6GHz band. Intel also has the AX210 listed on it's list of devices that support WPA3 on Windows 10

     

    • WPA3-Personal
      • Intel® Wireless adapters fully support WPA3-Personal using Windows® 10 May 2019 version 1903 Update or later, and Wi-Fi driver 21.10.X or later.
    • WPA3-Enterprise
      • Intel® Wireless adapters fully support WPA3-Enterprise using Windows® 10 May 2020 version 2004 Update or later, and Wi-Fi driver 21.90.3.X or later.


    According to Microsoft, they have supported WPA3-SAE as of WDI 0.1.1.8.

     

    Running "netsh wlan show wirelesscapabilities" (Windows 10 Pro 10.0.19043 Build 19043 21H1) shows both SAE and OWE are supported. SAE is supported in Linux, but I have the same authentication issue there as well (OWE works).

     

    WDI Version (Windows) : 0.1.1.9

    WDI Version (IHV) : 0.1.1.9

    SAE Authentication : Supported
    OWE Authentication : Supported

     

    The Windows connection log does show Wireless security succeeded then all of a sudden Wireless security stops. Strange, and does seem to indicate some sort of Windows / Driver issue.

     

     

    As I type this, I just got notification Intel officially released driver 22.40.0.7 for the AX210. When it installed through Windows Update a few days ago I got a BSOD and had to roll back, but about to try it again and hope for the best....

  • The wpa3 issue is a intel/windows issues. Otherwise the S21 wouldn't work. 
    I've ran into the same thing with my RAXE500. 

     

    In terms of speeds, its an issue with LPI (low power indoor) and the basic usage of how 6ghz works. Like 2.4ghz can penetrate further and though more materials than 5ghz, the 5ghz can do more than 6ghz. 

    The fcc doesn't currently support as high of power output on the 6g band as it does on the 5ghz and 2.4ghz band. So you see a much more rapid fall off in terms of signal strenght with distance than you do either band. 

     

    there's been talk of it being increased by the fcc this fall but so far its only approved for low power indoor usage. 

     

    I've messaged with netgear before on this I currently wouldn't recommend the RAXE500 over the RAX200 because the 3rd band is close to useless with its lower output power and the fact that windows/intel haven't even caught up on drivers yet. 

    • avtella's avatar
      avtella
      Prodigy

      WPA3 on 6Ghz requires something additional called SAE Hash to Element, it won't be available till the Windows 10 21H1 update this summer and will require a newer Intel driver supporting that function. This is not a router issue as Plemans pointed out.

      • Topology's avatar
        Topology
        Virtuoso

        Bal, thank you for an exceptionally well-written overview of your current experience with the RAXE500.  Two follow-up questions….

         

        [1] Is the LAG connection between the router and the CM1100 modem working well?

         

        [2] Is the LAG connection between the router and the Synology DS420+ working well?  Is the performance of the NAS noticeably improved as a result?

         

        And, one point of clarification:  I do not believe NETGEAR has claimed that the RAXE500 provides better signal range on the 6GHz band?  The only relevant comment I have seen is in the product datasheet:  “6GHz band is limited to indoor range.”