NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Solved
Will Orbi 6 work better through walls than Orbi 5?
I currently have an Orbi 5 (RBR50). It works fine in my home, but there is a smaller building separate from my house that needs internet as well. Internet there is spotty. It's never been superb, and my thinking is that it's the walls (because the distance isn't spectacular). I've tried adding powerline networking but the other building has its own differential switch which significantly reduces the network speed (as I understand).
So network speed remains volatile: sometimes good sometimes bad.
I'm wondering if the Orbi 6 (RBR850) is more powerful through walls. From what I read it's better over longer distances, but I'm not sure about wall penetration. If it's the same as the Orbi 5, it makes no sense for me to invest in the upgrade. But if it's better, I will consider purchasing the Orbi 6.
8 Replies
More detail about the physical layout would help.
- is it possible to provide a rough drawing of these buildings, and
- indicate the distances involved?
- Is there a single WiFi access point in one building and the remote building has no access points?
The WiFi Alliance did us no favors when "naming" the various flavors of WiFi.
- WiFi5 introduced the 5GHz frequency band.
- WiFi6 introduced a new method of encoding the same 5GHz frequency band. (802.11ax)
i.e. whatever causes WiFi5 signals to weaken does exactly the same thing to WiFi6 signals. - WiFi6E introduced the 6Ghz frequency band, which is even more affected by distance and building materials than the 5GHz band.
Just replacing the existing WiFi5 system with a WiFi6 system is not likely to be a satisfactory solution.
The most obvious way to provide WiFi to this smaller building is to install an Orbi satellite in the building, or perhaps a WiFi extender.
The devil is in the details.
I made a rough sketch, with distances that should be about right (in meter and feet). At the bottom left, the "R" indicates my Orbi router. In the top left of the first building, the "S" indicates a satellite. There is a satellite on the second floor as well, practically above the router.
The distance between the router and the satellite on the drawing is about 14.5m or 47.5 feet. The distance between the two buildings is about 2m or 6.ft.
Now, because I had this problem in the past, I purchased an extra satellite and placed it in the top building, in the top left corner. I had the impression that the satellite had trouble connecting, so I added a powerline-adapter between the two buildings. But like I said, they have their own electrical switchboards so the data has to go through the differential switch, which is what slows it down, from what I read.
Why not try using a simple point to point system to connect the 2 buildings?
What do you mean by a point-to-point system exactly? I'm no network expert, though should be able to understand what I read (I'm a developer so do have some IT understanding, just not a lot of hardware knowledge). I can't connect the two building by any new cables because that would require removing tiles, which would not make my SO happy 🙂
Exterior walls do a great job of blocking wifi as they tend to be made from materials that are great at it.
Like *tiles*, metal, foil lined insulation, etc.
A point to point system is just like it sounds, a system that has a master and a satellite that are basically designed to act as a wifi bridge between 2 points. Usually its for more distance as its very directional as its designed for longer distances.
You don't have far to go but you have 2 exterior walls to get through (garage and the home).
Might not be the best option for you.
With the close range, running the cable is the best option but the tiles cause issues.
I don't really have a good answer for you.
You're a bit limited as if a AC system doesn't penetrate, the AX system probably won't as well.
so you're reduced in your options.
I finally got round to trying out several options and in the end it was quite simple, as proposed in the reply I marked as answer. I moved two satellites so that they could "see" each other through windows. Before, the signal had to move through exterior walls. Now that there's a straight line between them that only passes through glass (even though they are about 5-10m further apart), it seems to be working much better.
