Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-07
07:06 AM
2014-03-07
07:06 AM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
I recently picked up a cheap Pro Business to finally replace two aging NV+ boxes. E7600 swap plus 4GB mem (this week) really brought the box to life. I've been reading the OS6 threads and I'm not sure if I want to jump on that bandwagon yet ... I'm a programmer and dont mind porting (or back porting) packages, etc - but I need the core to be solid and my data safe.
Message 251 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-08
12:36 PM
2014-03-08
12:36 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
My results going from stock E2160 to E7600 ($30 on eBay). I had already been running 8GB RAM, 8192 MB [6-6-6-18 DDR2]. Also I'm running 6x3TB drives all at 5400RPM.
BEFORE:
AFTER:
BEFORE:
TheNAS:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80GHz
stepping : 13
cpu MHz : 1795.524
cache size : 1024 KB
TheNAS:~# hdparm -t -T /dev/c/c
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 2306 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1152.98 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1144 MB in 3.00 seconds = 381.03 MB/sec
Fan SYS 1607 RPM
Fan CPU 1896 RPM
Temp SYS 57 C / 134 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F]
Temp CPU 26.5 C / 79 F [Normal 0-85 C / 32-185 F]
AFTER:
TheNAS:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7600 @ 3.06GHz
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 3059.349
cache size : 3072 KB
TheNAS:~# hdparm -t -T /dev/c/c
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 3880 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1940.38 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 970 MB in 3.00 seconds = 323.05 MB/sec
Fan SYS 1088 RPM
Fan CPU 2008 RPM
Temp SYS 61 C / 141 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F]
Temp CPU 28.5 C / 83 F [Normal 0-85 C / 32-185 F]
Message 252 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-19
09:00 AM
2014-03-19
09:00 AM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Hello there,
Just to report another successful CPU replacement on my Pro Business!
I have installed an E6600 SL9ZL as mostly recommended for no-hassle operations.
Here the outcome
BEFORE:
AFTER:
Actual reading/writing speeds are about 100MB/s both in reading and writing. Reading sometimes slows down, the throughout is not constant, but I blame my PC, even though I am saving on an SSD (it happens after 15-17GB of data transferred so it's not the cache!).
Now some termal stress to confirm the CPU is stable, after all it was not brand new.
And a note: have a look at the factory footprint of the thermal compound... And the CPU was running at 18°C! I sanded a little the heatsink - very fine sandpaper, 1200 - to try and improve it. (Now I'm looking at the picture, there was no thermal compound at all!)
A quick update:
The CPU temperature started from 16°C (Even though have about 18°C by the floor, I'm surprised the CPU stays at that temperature?). I covered the fan and it's now at 38°. The fan is still running at 2000rpm.
That was happening with the old CPU as well. I guess 38°C is still acceptable for the system. Then I stuck a cable tie in the fan to stop it. It took a while for the temperature to reach 60°, at that point the fan, when the cable tie was remove, was spinning at 5000rpm.
Is there a way I can run a stress test on the CPU by SSH? (update: got it from this thread, running it now)
Just to report another successful CPU replacement on my Pro Business!
I have installed an E6600 SL9ZL as mostly recommended for no-hassle operations.
Here the outcome
Netgear_1:/proc# cat cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 2393.899
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant _tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vm x est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm dts tpr_shadow
bogomips : 4787.79
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 2393.899
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 1
initial apicid : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant _tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vm x est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm dts tpr_shadow
bogomips : 4787.76
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
BEFORE:
AFTER:
Netgear_1:/proc# hdparm -t -T /dev/c/c
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 8090 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4051.54 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 442 MB in 3.00 seconds = 147.26 MB/sec
Actual reading/writing speeds are about 100MB/s both in reading and writing. Reading sometimes slows down, the throughout is not constant, but I blame my PC, even though I am saving on an SSD (it happens after 15-17GB of data transferred so it's not the cache!).
Now some termal stress to confirm the CPU is stable, after all it was not brand new.
And a note: have a look at the factory footprint of the thermal compound... And the CPU was running at 18°C! I sanded a little the heatsink - very fine sandpaper, 1200 - to try and improve it. (Now I'm looking at the picture, there was no thermal compound at all!)
A quick update:
The CPU temperature started from 16°C (Even though have about 18°C by the floor, I'm surprised the CPU stays at that temperature?). I covered the fan and it's now at 38°. The fan is still running at 2000rpm.
That was happening with the old CPU as well. I guess 38°C is still acceptable for the system. Then I stuck a cable tie in the fan to stop it. It took a while for the temperature to reach 60°, at that point the fan, when the cable tie was remove, was spinning at 5000rpm.
Is there a way I can run a stress test on the CPU by SSH? (update: got it from this thread, running it now)
Message 253 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-21
01:50 PM
2014-03-21
01:50 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Just upgraded my partners' Pro system in LA and again seeing great results! 😄
We used another E6700 SL9ZF purchased on eBay:
BEFORE CPU:
AFTER CPU:
BEFORE - timed reads (best of 10)
AFTER - timed reads (best of 10)
BEFORE - temperatures and fans
AFTER - temperatures and fans
I think the team will be very happy with this upgrade, especially for things like large iPhoto libraries.
Once again, super easy to do and will give our Pro years of new life! :thumbsup:
We used another E6700 SL9ZF purchased on eBay:
BEFORE CPU:
PM_ReadyNAS:/Public_Matters# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80GHz
stepping : 13
cpu MHz : 1795.801
cache size : 1024 KB
AFTER CPU:
PM_ReadyNAS:/Public_Matters# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @ 2.66GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 2660.099
cache size : 4096 KB
BEFORE - timed reads (best of 10)
PM_ReadyNAS:/Public_Matters# hdparm -t -T /dev/c/c
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 2428 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1214.01 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 864 MB in 3.00 seconds = 287.72 MB/sec
PM_ReadyNAS:/Public_Matters# hdparm -t -T /dev/c/c
AFTER - timed reads (best of 10)
PM_ReadyNAS:/Public_Matters# hdparm -t -T /dev/c/c
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 10142 MB in 2.00 seconds = 5080.49 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 814 MB in 3.00 seconds = 271.29 MB/sec
PM_ReadyNAS:/Public_Matters# hdparm -t -T /dev/c/c
BEFORE - temperatures and fans
Fan SYS 937 RPM OK
Fan CPU 1721 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 21.5 C / 70 F [Normal 0-85 C / 32-185 F] OK
AFTER - temperatures and fans
Fan SYS 932 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2083 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 22.5 C / 72 F [Normal 0-85 C / 32-185 F] OK
I think the team will be very happy with this upgrade, especially for things like large iPhoto libraries.
Once again, super easy to do and will give our Pro years of new life! :thumbsup:
Message 254 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-21
02:03 PM
2014-03-21
02:03 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Quick question for everyone -
Would it be possible to increase the RAM in our Pros from 2GB to 8GB?
If so, would we get any additional performance benefits? For example, faster buffered disk reads?
Thanks!
Would it be possible to increase the RAM in our Pros from 2GB to 8GB?
If so, would we get any additional performance benefits? For example, faster buffered disk reads?
Thanks!
Message 255 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-21
03:25 PM
2014-03-21
03:25 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
dhl wrote: Would it be possible to increase the RAM in our Pros from 2GB to 8GB?
If so, would we get any additional performance benefits? For example, faster buffered disk reads?
Yes and yes. The Patriot PSD28G800K kit (2 x 4GB) works well.
Message 256 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-03-21
04:05 PM
2014-03-21
04:05 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
fastfwd wrote:
dhl wrote: Would it be possible to increase the RAM in our Pros from 2GB to 8GB?
If so, would we get any additional performance benefits? For example, faster buffered disk reads?
Yes and yes. The Patriot PSD28G800K kit (2 x 4GB) works well.
Thanks! Will put this on the list for the next upgrade! :mrgreen:
Message 257 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-05-23
12:28 AM
2014-05-23
12:28 AM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Wish I had discovered this thread while DDR2 was still cheap! I maxed out my Business Pro at 4GB a few years ago thinking that was the limit. Oh wells...
Odd thing about the CPU upgrade is that the older and slower clocked E6600 and E6700 seem to give better hdparam scores than the newer and higher clocked E7600. Here are my scores:
E2160 (Stock Pentium, 1.80Ghz)
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 2354 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1177.79 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1120 MB in 3.00 seconds = 372.82 MB/sec
E7600 (Core 2 Duo, 3.06Ghz)
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 3960 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1980.20 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1574 MB in 3.00 seconds = 524.41 MB/sec
E6700 (Core 2 Duo, 2.66Ghz)
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 9878 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4947.44 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1554 MB in 3.00 seconds = 517.78 MB/sec
The hdparam scores are pretty dramatic. What does that translate into real world usage? Would the E7600 be better for transcoding and streaming or should I stick with the E6700 given the hdparam scores?
Thanks!
Odd thing about the CPU upgrade is that the older and slower clocked E6600 and E6700 seem to give better hdparam scores than the newer and higher clocked E7600. Here are my scores:
E2160 (Stock Pentium, 1.80Ghz)
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 2354 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1177.79 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1120 MB in 3.00 seconds = 372.82 MB/sec
E7600 (Core 2 Duo, 3.06Ghz)
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 3960 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1980.20 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1574 MB in 3.00 seconds = 524.41 MB/sec
E6700 (Core 2 Duo, 2.66Ghz)
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 9878 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4947.44 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1554 MB in 3.00 seconds = 517.78 MB/sec
The hdparam scores are pretty dramatic. What does that translate into real world usage? Would the E7600 be better for transcoding and streaming or should I stick with the E6700 given the hdparam scores?
Thanks!
Message 258 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-05-23
03:36 AM
2014-05-23
03:36 AM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
eurotech wrote: Odd thing about the CPU upgrade is that the older and slower clocked E6600 and E6700 seem to give better hdparam scores than the newer and higher clocked E7600.
Yes. I noticed this before and we've had some (as-yet inconclusive) discussion about it here. My best guess at the moment is that it's because the E6600 has 4MB of L2 cache while the other chips have only 3MB.
eurotech wrote: What does that translate into real world usage? Would the E7600 be better for transcoding and streaming or should I stick with the E6700 given the hdparam scores?
I don't know. I've been very happy with my E6600, but I don't do video transcoding. I suspect that the E7600's higher clock speed (and SSE4.1 instructions) will trump the E6600's cache efficiency, but the easiest way to know for sure would be to try both chips and see.
If you do try both, post your results here. I'm sure many others will be interested.
Message 259 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-05-23
06:59 AM
2014-05-23
06:59 AM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Both these processors work up to 1066FSB, but I think the PRO has an 800Mhz FSB. I wonder if the E7600 has more delay when working at 800Mhz. Maybe it's a bad internal multiplier for that chip or something. I've tried to get info about the real speed the FSB is running at but the kernel we have just doesn't show it in any of the utilities I've installed. Possibly if I hooked up a monitor I could see what the bios reports, but I haven't gotten to it.
Message 260 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-06-04
01:26 PM
2014-06-04
01:26 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Has anybody tried an Intel Pentium E6800 (LGA775, 2 Cores, 2M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 1066 FSB, 45 nm, 65 W TDP)? It was cheaper at retail, but currently costs more and is more difficult to find on eBay. Here's are some links to some comparisons:
PassMark C2D E6700 vs C2D E7600 vs Pentium E6800 (Copy and Paste this link)
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1668&cmp[]=948&cmp[]=1398
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 vs Pentium E6800
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium E6800
TRANSCODING TEST
I went ahead and performed some rudimentary benchmarks, and it seems that the C2D E7600 performs slightly better at transcoding as expected. I down converted some videos to 720p using ffmpeg for AirVideo 2.0.00. I used this command for all files:
ffmpeg -i FILENAME.EXT -t 300 -vcodec libx264 -crf 23 -preset ultrafast -s hd720 -acodec copy FILENAME_PROCESSOR.mp4 -vstats_file FILENAME_PROCESSOR.txt
This is what ffmpeg reports:
C2D E6700
[libx264 @ 0x8da2ea0] using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 Cache64
C2D E7600
[libx264 @ 0x8dd0f80] using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
MPEG2.WTV
Stream #0.0[0x5]: Video: mpeg2video (Main), yuv420p, 1920x1080 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 20000 kb/s, 29.97 fps, 29.97 tbr, 10000k tbn, 59.94 tbc
Stream #0.2[0x6]: Audio: ac3, 48000 Hz, 5.1, s16, 384 kb/s
C2D E6700: 30 fps
C2D E7600: 34 fps
1080P.MP4
Stream #0.0(und): Video: h264 (High), yuv420p, 1920x1080 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 11998 kb/s, 29.97 fps, 29.97 tbr, 30k tbn, 59.94 tbc
Stream #0.1(und): Audio: aac, 48000 Hz, stereo, s16, 127 kb/s
C2D E6700: 21 fps
C2D E7600: 24 fps
4K.MP4
Stream #0.0(eng): Video: h264 (High), yuv420p, 4096x2160 [PAR 1:1 DAR 256:135], 24686 kb/s, 23.98 fps, 23.98 tbr, 48k tbn, 47.95 tbc
Stream #0.1(eng): Audio: aac, 48000 Hz, stereo, s16, 317 kb/s
C2D E6700: 8 fps
C2D E7600: 9 fps
TEMPERATURE
I checked frontview during the last minute of each test and there really wasn't much of a difference in heat measurements, although the C2D E7600 reported lower for me overall.
C2D E6700
Fan SYS 1278 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2163 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 45 C / 113 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
------
Fan SYS 1298 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2136 RPM OK
Temp SYS 60 C / 140 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 46.5 C / 115 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
------
Fan SYS 1534 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2083 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 46.5 C / 115 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
C2D E7600
Fan SYS 975 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2191 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 44.5 C / 112 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
------
Fan SYS 975 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2163 RPM OK
Temp SYS 60 C / 140 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 44 C / 111 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
------
Fan SYS 1339 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2109 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 43 C / 109 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
FILE COPY TEST
I wanted to see if there would be any noticeable difference transferring files from share to share, but there wasn't any real difference. I didn't think to get out the stopwatch for precise time measurements, but the log files generated indicte each process completed within five minutes.
28,157 Files, 956 Folders
18.7 GB (20,091,560,191 bytes)
cp -v -r source/* E6700 &> E6700.txt
12:38AM
12:43AM
~5 min
cp -v -r source/* E7600 &> E7600.txt
2:33AM
2:38AM
~5 min
The real interesting part is when I deleted the subsequent folders with Windows 8.1. I deleted the folders before installing and running the test with the next processor to free up drive space.
Windows hovered around 94 items per second deleting while C2D E6700 was installed.
Windows hovered around 85 items per second deleting while C2D E7600 was installed.
Perhaps there is some merit to the hdparam scores? Not at all scientific, but more to add to the puzzle.
PassMark C2D E6700 vs C2D E7600 vs Pentium E6800 (Copy and Paste this link)
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1668&cmp[]=948&cmp[]=1398
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 vs Pentium E6800
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Pentium E6800
TRANSCODING TEST
I went ahead and performed some rudimentary benchmarks, and it seems that the C2D E7600 performs slightly better at transcoding as expected. I down converted some videos to 720p using ffmpeg for AirVideo 2.0.00. I used this command for all files:
ffmpeg -i FILENAME.EXT -t 300 -vcodec libx264 -crf 23 -preset ultrafast -s hd720 -acodec copy FILENAME_PROCESSOR.mp4 -vstats_file FILENAME_PROCESSOR.txt
This is what ffmpeg reports:
C2D E6700
[libx264 @ 0x8da2ea0] using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 Cache64
C2D E7600
[libx264 @ 0x8dd0f80] using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
MPEG2.WTV
Stream #0.0[0x5]: Video: mpeg2video (Main), yuv420p, 1920x1080 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 20000 kb/s, 29.97 fps, 29.97 tbr, 10000k tbn, 59.94 tbc
Stream #0.2[0x6]: Audio: ac3, 48000 Hz, 5.1, s16, 384 kb/s
C2D E6700: 30 fps
C2D E7600: 34 fps
1080P.MP4
Stream #0.0(und): Video: h264 (High), yuv420p, 1920x1080 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 11998 kb/s, 29.97 fps, 29.97 tbr, 30k tbn, 59.94 tbc
Stream #0.1(und): Audio: aac, 48000 Hz, stereo, s16, 127 kb/s
C2D E6700: 21 fps
C2D E7600: 24 fps
4K.MP4
Stream #0.0(eng): Video: h264 (High), yuv420p, 4096x2160 [PAR 1:1 DAR 256:135], 24686 kb/s, 23.98 fps, 23.98 tbr, 48k tbn, 47.95 tbc
Stream #0.1(eng): Audio: aac, 48000 Hz, stereo, s16, 317 kb/s
C2D E6700: 8 fps
C2D E7600: 9 fps
TEMPERATURE
I checked frontview during the last minute of each test and there really wasn't much of a difference in heat measurements, although the C2D E7600 reported lower for me overall.
C2D E6700
Fan SYS 1278 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2163 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 45 C / 113 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
------
Fan SYS 1298 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2136 RPM OK
Temp SYS 60 C / 140 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 46.5 C / 115 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
------
Fan SYS 1534 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2083 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 46.5 C / 115 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
C2D E7600
Fan SYS 975 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2191 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 44.5 C / 112 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
------
Fan SYS 975 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2163 RPM OK
Temp SYS 60 C / 140 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 44 C / 111 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
------
Fan SYS 1339 RPM OK
Fan CPU 2109 RPM OK
Temp SYS 58 C / 136 F [Normal 0-65 C / 32-149 F] OK
Temp CPU 43 C / 109 F [Normal 0-60 C / 32-140 F] OK
FILE COPY TEST
I wanted to see if there would be any noticeable difference transferring files from share to share, but there wasn't any real difference. I didn't think to get out the stopwatch for precise time measurements, but the log files generated indicte each process completed within five minutes.
28,157 Files, 956 Folders
18.7 GB (20,091,560,191 bytes)
cp -v -r source/* E6700 &> E6700.txt
12:38AM
12:43AM
~5 min
cp -v -r source/* E7600 &> E7600.txt
2:33AM
2:38AM
~5 min
The real interesting part is when I deleted the subsequent folders with Windows 8.1. I deleted the folders before installing and running the test with the next processor to free up drive space.
Windows hovered around 94 items per second deleting while C2D E6700 was installed.
Windows hovered around 85 items per second deleting while C2D E7600 was installed.
Perhaps there is some merit to the hdparam scores? Not at all scientific, but more to add to the puzzle.
Message 261 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-09-06
12:50 PM
2014-09-06
12:50 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
hello,
is it possible to upgrade cpu for a Ultra4?
is it possible to upgrade cpu for a Ultra4?
Message 262 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-09-06
03:13 PM
2014-09-06
03:13 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
mrQQ wrote:
is it possible to upgrade cpu for a Ultra4?
No. It is soldered onto the motherboard.
Message 263 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-11-10
02:59 PM
2014-11-10
02:59 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
fastfwd wrote:
Yes and yes. The Patriot PSD28G800K kit (2 x 4GB) works well.
I just upgraded to this RAM kit which I bought used on Ebay. Not seeing any change in performance but that may be on my drives at this point. Will find out soon since they're overdue for replacement.
I did a memory test from the boot menu and was wondering how to interpret the results. It did two passes. First one that passed, then a second. At 100% the second time, it also said Pass. But it stayed at 100% and didn't loop a third time. After about a half hour I had to power off to get out of memory test mode.
I've never run the mem test before and am wondering if this is normal behavior. Is it suppose to work like this? Does this mean my memory is good?
Thanks!
Message 264 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-11-10
03:26 PM
2014-11-10
03:26 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Do you have a backup?
You could try using the NAS unit for a while, download the logs and check diagnostics.log
You could try using the NAS unit for a while, download the logs and check diagnostics.log
Message 265 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-11-10
03:45 PM
2014-11-10
03:45 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
I do have a backup, though one of the jobs failed with unusual I/O errors last night.
Since the only change was RAM, I wanted to run the memory test to make sure RAM was good and I'm not seeing a problem with the backup drive like before.
Did the memory test behave properly or is it supposed to loop until stopped?
Since the only change was RAM, I wanted to run the memory test to make sure RAM was good and I'm not seeing a problem with the backup drive like before.
Did the memory test behave properly or is it supposed to loop until stopped?
Message 266 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-11-10
05:12 PM
2014-11-10
05:12 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
I think it is meant to loop.
Where do you do your backups to?
Have you checked disk health?
Where do you do your backups to?
Have you checked disk health?
Message 267 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-11-10
05:49 PM
2014-11-10
05:49 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Backups are to two USB drives. Each drive backs up different shares. One is connected to the ReadyNAS and backs up via FrontView. The other attaches to my desktop and backs up via Carbon Copy Cloner.
Here's the SMART data for the raid set. Some of the disks have Raw Read Errors but they check out as OK with SMART
The problem last time was with the USB drive connected to the ReadyNAS.
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=78258
I'm having trouble with this drive again so maybe it's really starting to go? I can try running fsck on it again and see what it says.
I'm still concerned about the RAM and will send it back if it's bad. I downloaded the logs and it checks out:
Thoughts?
Here's the SMART data for the raid set. Some of the disks have Raw Read Errors but they check out as OK with SMART
SMART Information for Disk 1
Model: SAMSUNG HD203WI
Serial: S1UYJ1KZ310344
Firmware: 1AN10002
SMART Attribute
Raw Read Error Rate 159
Throughput Performance 0
Spin Up Time 6186
Start Stop Count 46
Reallocated Sector Count 0
Seek Error Rate 0
Seek Time Performance 0
Power On Hours 39601
Spin Retry Count 0
Calibration Retry Count 0
Power Cycle Count 46
G-Sense Error Rate 1
Power-Off Retract Count 0
Temperature Celsius 36
Hardware ECC Recovered 0
Reallocated Event Count 0
Current Pending Sector 0
Offline Uncorrectable 0
UDMA CRC Error Count 0
Multi Zone Error Rate 0
Load Retry Count 0
Load Cycle Count 63
ATA Error Count 0
SMART Information for Disk 3
Model: SAMSUNG HD203WI
Serial: S1UYJ1KZ310364
Firmware: 1AN10002
SMART Attribute
Raw Read Error Rate 589
Throughput Performance 0
Spin Up Time 6146
Start Stop Count 46
Reallocated Sector Count 0
Seek Error Rate 0
Seek Time Performance 0
Power On Hours 39601
Spin Retry Count 0
Calibration Retry Count 0
Power Cycle Count 46
G-Sense Error Rate 3
Power-Off Retract Count 0
Temperature Celsius 34
Hardware ECC Recovered 0
Reallocated Event Count 0
Current Pending Sector 0
Offline Uncorrectable 0
UDMA CRC Error Count 0
Multi Zone Error Rate 0
Load Retry Count 0
Load Cycle Count 62
ATA Error Count 0
SMART Information for Disk 4
Model: SAMSUNG HD203WI
Serial: S1UYJ1KZ310345
Firmware: 1AN10002
SMART Attribute
Raw Read Error Rate 163
Throughput Performance 0
Spin Up Time 6289
Start Stop Count 46
Reallocated Sector Count 0
Seek Error Rate 0
Seek Time Performance 0
Power On Hours 39601
Spin Retry Count 0
Calibration Retry Count 0
Power Cycle Count 46
G-Sense Error Rate 2
Power-Off Retract Count 0
Temperature Celsius 34
Hardware ECC Recovered 0
Reallocated Event Count 0
Current Pending Sector 0
Offline Uncorrectable 0
UDMA CRC Error Count 0
Multi Zone Error Rate 0
Load Retry Count 0
Load Cycle Count 62
ATA Error Count 0
SMART Information for Disk 6
Model: Hitachi HDS723020BLA642
Serial: MN1240F33MZ28D
Firmware: MN6OA800
SMART Attribute
Raw Read Error Rate 0
Throughput Performance 82
Spin Up Time 421
Start Stop Count 24
Reallocated Sector Count 0
Seek Error Rate 0
Seek Time Performance 25
Power On Hours 21978
Spin Retry Count 0
Power Cycle Count 24
Power-Off Retract Count 28
Load Cycle Count 28
Temperature Celsius 36
Reallocated Event Count 0
Current Pending Sector 0
Offline Uncorrectable 0
UDMA CRC Error Count 0
ATA Error Count 0
The problem last time was with the USB drive connected to the ReadyNAS.
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=78258
I'm having trouble with this drive again so maybe it's really starting to go? I can try running fsck on it again and see what it says.
I'm still concerned about the RAM and will send it back if it's bad. I downloaded the logs and it checks out:
Disks
-------------------------------
Passed diagnostics.
Memory
-------------------------------
Passed diagnostics.
Network
-------------------------------
Passed diagnostics.
Performance
-------------------------------
* Jumbo frames are disabled on interface 1. If both your switch and clients support jumbo frames, you can enhance your write performance by enabling jumbo frames on this interface.
* Jumbo frames are disabled on interface 2. If both your switch and clients support jumbo frames, you can enhance your write performance by enabling jumbo frames on this interface.
Volume
-------------------------------
Passed diagnostics.
Thoughts?
Message 268 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-11-10
06:08 PM
2014-11-10
06:08 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
[quote="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.#Known_ATA_S.M.A.R.T._attributes":10ajgjmw](Vendor specific raw value.) Stores data related to the rate of hardware read errors that occurred when reading data from a disk surface. The raw value has different structure for different vendors and is often not meaningful as a decimal number.[/quote:10ajgjmw]
Without knowing what the Samsung Raw Read Error values exactly mean, it is impossible to tell if it is problem or not.
Without knowing what the Samsung Raw Read Error values exactly mean, it is impossible to tell if it is problem or not.
Message 269 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-11-10
06:54 PM
2014-11-10
06:54 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Did you get a drive utility from samsung with the usb drive? I think there should have been one with it or you can download it from samsung.
FWIW Do you have your usb drives (and NAS) on a battery backup? The corrupt folder you had before looks like what you can get when you have a power outage. I'm sure there are other ways, but that is definitely one way to get there.
steve
FWIW Do you have your usb drives (and NAS) on a battery backup? The corrupt folder you had before looks like what you can get when you have a power outage. I'm sure there are other ways, but that is definitely one way to get there.
steve
Message 270 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-11-10
07:20 PM
2014-11-10
07:20 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
The USB backup drives are both Seagates. The ReadyNAS is connected to battery backup and so is the attached USB drive, but my logs don't show any recent power outages. The corrupt folder issue was due to Carbon Copy Cloner and was fixed by the developer.
Message 271 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-12-13
01:43 AM
2014-12-13
01:43 AM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
Changed the standard processor E2160 to E7600. Memory 4GB, not changed
WAS
NAS:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80GHz
stepping : 13
cpu MHz : 1795.522
cache size : 1024 KB
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 2526 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1263.67 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1108 MB in 3.00 seconds = 369.07 MB/sec
NOW
/proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7600 @ 3.06GHz
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 3058.978
cache size : 3072 KB
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 4106 MB in 2.00 seconds = 2054.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1566 MB in 3.00 seconds = 521.82 MB/sec
SYS 917 rpm ОК
CPU 1985 rpm ОК
temp SYS 57
temp CPU 39
Work well!
WAS
NAS:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80GHz
stepping : 13
cpu MHz : 1795.522
cache size : 1024 KB
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 2526 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1263.67 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1108 MB in 3.00 seconds = 369.07 MB/sec
NOW
/proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7600 @ 3.06GHz
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 3058.978
cache size : 3072 KB
/dev/c/c:
Timing cached reads: 4106 MB in 2.00 seconds = 2054.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 1566 MB in 3.00 seconds = 521.82 MB/sec
SYS 917 rpm ОК
CPU 1985 rpm ОК
temp SYS 57
temp CPU 39
Work well!
Message 272 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-12-27
06:32 PM
2014-12-27
06:32 PM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
I tried an E6850 on a Pro6 with mobo Flame 6 Version 1.1.
It didn't boot.
The E6850 is 3.00ghz core 2 duo 4MB of L2
I returned to the stock E2168 until I try an E6700.
E18 is 1.8ghz Pentium dual-core.
If the E6700 doesn't work on this mobo, I'd appreciate a heads up.
It didn't boot.
The E6850 is 3.00ghz core 2 duo 4MB of L2
I returned to the stock E2168 until I try an E6700.
E18 is 1.8ghz Pentium dual-core.
If the E6700 doesn't work on this mobo, I'd appreciate a heads up.
Message 273 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-04-23
02:45 AM
2015-04-23
02:45 AM
ReadyNAS PRO Pioneer E6700 working E7600 NOT working
Dear All:
Trying to breathe new life into my ageing Pioneer Pros (one is for backups, one is a video streamer)
After successfully upgrading my ReadyNAS Pro Pioneer Edition to e6700 tried an e7600, the display says ReadyNAS, the fan(s?) blow at full speed and nothing happens.
I have two NASes, and I tried two CPUs and both failed.
The motherboard says Flame ver 1.1 and the yellow square sticker says "FA5"
My obvious concern is that the CPUs might have arrived dead.
However, reading through the forums, I recall Chripa mentioning that earlier boards may not support later CPUs.
Any idea whether this particular board revision should support the e7600?
Will a BIOS upgrade potentially fix this problem?
If so, how do I perform one? I understand this is different from the RAIDiator firmware upgrade (I am of course running the latest)
Thanks you so much for your input.
Chirpa - pls help!!!
Trying to breathe new life into my ageing Pioneer Pros (one is for backups, one is a video streamer)
After successfully upgrading my ReadyNAS Pro Pioneer Edition to e6700 tried an e7600, the display says ReadyNAS, the fan(s?) blow at full speed and nothing happens.
I have two NASes, and I tried two CPUs and both failed.
The motherboard says Flame ver 1.1 and the yellow square sticker says "FA5"
My obvious concern is that the CPUs might have arrived dead.
However, reading through the forums, I recall Chripa mentioning that earlier boards may not support later CPUs.
Any idea whether this particular board revision should support the e7600?
Will a BIOS upgrade potentially fix this problem?
If so, how do I perform one? I understand this is different from the RAIDiator firmware upgrade (I am of course running the latest)
Thanks you so much for your input.
Chirpa - pls help!!!
Message 274 of 285
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2015-04-23
03:54 AM
2015-04-23
03:54 AM
Re: More on CPU specs of the ReadyNAS Pro
First download the logs, look in bios_ver.log and see if you are already running the latest BIOS. Then if you are running an old BIOS you would need to install the add-on to update the BIOS.
To see what the latest BIOS version is and to get the add-on see http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=387035#p387035
To see what the latest BIOS version is and to get the add-on see http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=387035#p387035
Message 275 of 285