NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Help needed with Orbi RBK50!
Hello everyone. I have a three bedroom apartment that is approx. 1,500 square feet. The only [active] coaxial hookup is in one corner of the apartment. It's not an ideal spot, but it's what I have to...
The powerline adapters idea is a good one. I have NETGEAR PowerLINE 1200 Mbps, 1 Gigabit Port (PL1200-100PAS). I would simply connect that to to my router and a switch, and then wire the components to the switch, right?
thebahlfam wrote:
The powerline adapters idea is a good one. I have NETGEAR PowerLINE 1200 Mbps, 1 Gigabit Port (PL1200-100PAS). I would simply connect that to to my router and a switch, and then wire the components to the switch, right?
I would connect the Router to a Powerline Adapter with another Powerline Adapter for you TV, PS4 etc. This is where you want to add an Ethernet Switch and plug your TV, PS4 etc. into the switch. If the Powerline Adpaters are stable then great. I had Internet drops with my older ones (both Netgear and Devolo) i.e. non pass-through. I swapped them for the pass-through type as they're better at filtering mains noise - not a single issue since.
Thank you, all, for the suggestions and feedback.
If I decided to purchase an additional satellite and positions the router and satellites in a "triangle" at least 30 feet apart, would that be ok? With the proposed solutions and building materials in my house, I worry about the baby room (the bottom right in the attached screenshot) getting appropriate coverage.
Before deciding to get the RBK50, I had a Linksys wireless extended very close to the baby room (the router was in the same place). The wireless coverage in the baby room was awful. As a result, the Arlo Baby monitor delivered very poor performance.
That should work. Review earlier suggestions. You may only need the router and 1 satellite for good coverage for your size of home.
Yes having an extender and router to close will not work like that.
Thanks! This may be a silly question, but how can I determine whether a second satellite is necessary or not? In other words, we are speaking in hypotheticals based on experience, expected performance, etc. The only way to know for sure would be to run speed tests before and after the satellite, right?
