NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

ptdurfee's avatar
ptdurfee
Aspirant
Aug 27, 2021

trying to decide what to buy to reach my barn

I have an RBR50 Orbi router, plus a satellite in my house.  The satellite does not reach my barn (150' away)  with consistent signal.        

 

Should I buy another satellite and put it in the barn?  Would that receive signal better from the satellite in the house?

 

OR  should I put a range extender in the house? 

What will reach that distance better?

 

Will a NEW device in the house, transmitting to the barn, work better than my V1 devices?

 

I DO alreeady have the satellite strategically placed.

I am considering theputdoor version to help out.

 

Any experienced  advice is appreciated.

 

4 Replies

  • FURRYe38's avatar
    FURRYe38
    Guru - Experienced User

    The distance is too far for wireless. You'll need a buried CAT6A lan cable between the house and barn, then you could install a RBS via ethernet in the barn area. 

    • ptdurfee's avatar
      ptdurfee
      Aspirant

      Thanks for that info.  I do already have some signal there.  Just trying to iprove it.

      It may be a bit less than 150' also.

       

      My question maybe is:

       

      What will reach farther:

       

      a satellite to satellite link, or

      a range extender (repeater?)  to satellite  link, or

      a satellite or extender to end user device                  ???

       

      I am not concerned about data rates much as I am not a heavy user in the outbuilding.

       

      Thanks again

       

      • FURRYe38's avatar
        FURRYe38
        Guru - Experienced User

        If some signal is there, then it would a a low signal. Trying to extend or amplify this will not produce better signal. Your just amplifying a low signal at the extender point and at any time that single could be lost or not usable. You'd be amplifying a low signal with no much operation and performance so yes, connection rates between the low signal and the extender would be questionable. Connections to the extender would be good but past the extender to the house would probably not be good. 

         

        If you have a clear path from home to barn possible buried cable or hung cable should be reviewed. 

         

        You can take a look at this and see if this would work as well:

        https://www.netgear.com/business/products/wireless/wireless-airbridge/wbc502.aspx


        ptdurfee wrote:

        Thanks for that info.  I do already have some signal there.  Just trying to iprove it.

        It may be a bit less than 150' also.

         

        My question maybe is:

         

        What will reach farther:

         

        a satellite to satellite link, or

        a range extender (repeater?)  to satellite  link, or

        a satellite or extender to end user device                  ???

         

        I am not concerned about data rates much as I am not a heavy user in the outbuilding.

         

        Thanks again

         


         

  • CrimpOn's avatar
    CrimpOn
    Guru - Experienced User

    ptdurfee wrote:

    Should I buy another satellite and put it in the barn?  Would that receive signal better from the satellite in the house?

     

    OR  should I put a range extender in the house? 

    What will reach that distance better?

     


    There are two issues:

    • How to get the network extended 150' to the barn
    • What WiFi signal to provide at the barn location.

    The #1 solution is to place an ethernet cable between the house and barn.  It gives the highest and most reliable signal.  200ft. of Cat6 direct burial cable is about $60 on Amazon. The cable, however, is a minor part of the total project cost. Digging 150' of trench, potentially across roadways and other obstacles, installing 150' of conduit (what if the cable needs to be replaced in the future?), penetrating both the house and barn.  The total cost and effort can be considerable.

     

    Many users have been successful at this distance using a point to point WiFi bridge, such as this one:

    https://www.amazon.com/Wireless-UeeVii-CPE71C-Transmission-Surveillance-dp-B08XLDZM3X/dp/B08XLDZM3X/ref=dp_ob_title_def 

    I am not recommending this particular product. It just popped up at the top of the Amazon page. (They probably pay Amazon for that.)

    There have been any number of posts recommending Ubiquiti Nano Stations which cost a bit more but have higher performance.  Since these units are rated in terms of kilometers, they usually have enough power to be mounted inside the house and the (non metal) barn.

    Netgear also sells one of these: https://www.netgear.com/business/wifi/wireless-bridges/wbc502/ 

     

    The second issue is what to put in the barn.  This depends on what you want the network in the barn for. (smart phone? computer? milking machine? ) Purchasing an Orbi satellite will provide seamless WiFi coverage. Same WiFi name (SSID) and password.  Your phone wll "just work" going back and forth.  This may cost more than the WiFi bridge.

     

    A less costly solution would be to put any WiFi access point in the barn.  Ethernet devices will connect directly and be on the main network.  You may have to experiment with the WiFi SSID.  If devices drop WiFi by the time they reach the barn, that access point can have the same SSID/password as the Orbi  system and devices will just see it and connect.  Otherwise, it may take action on your part to switch the connection.