NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
trato
May 15, 2012Aspirant
VPN between FVS336G and FVS318G
Hello
Could anyone halp me?
I'm trying to stablish vpn between two sites using a FVS336G and FVS318G.
This logs are displayed and connection does not came online:
2012 May 15 19:44:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 1 negotiation failed due to time up for ip_site2[500]. 5ec4b08f6b6689dd:0000000000000000_
2012 May 15 19:44:09 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1. ESP ip_site2->ip_site1 _
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Setting DPD Vendor ID_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] NAT-Traversal is Enabled_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Beginning Aggressive mode._
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: ip_site1[500]<=>ip_site2[500]_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Configuration found for ip_site2._
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.0.0/24<->192.168.1.0/24_
2012 May 15 19:43:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 1 negotiation failed due to time up for ip_site2[500]. f00cdb522a441665:0000000000000000_
2012 May 15 19:43:02 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1. _
2012 May 15 19:43:02 [Armazem] [IKE] Invalid SA protocol type: 0_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Setting DPD Vendor ID_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] NAT-Traversal is Enabled_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Beginning Aggressive mode._
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: ip_site1[500]<=>ip_site2[500]_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Configuration found for ip_site2._
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] accept a request to establish IKE-SA: ip_site2_
Could anyone halp me?
I'm trying to stablish vpn between two sites using a FVS336G and FVS318G.
This logs are displayed and connection does not came online:
2012 May 15 19:44:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 1 negotiation failed due to time up for ip_site2[500]. 5ec4b08f6b6689dd:0000000000000000_
2012 May 15 19:44:09 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1. ESP ip_site2->ip_site1 _
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Setting DPD Vendor ID_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] NAT-Traversal is Enabled_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Beginning Aggressive mode._
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: ip_site1[500]<=>ip_site2[500]_
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Configuration found for ip_site2._
2012 May 15 19:43:38 [Armazem] [IKE] Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.0.0/24<->192.168.1.0/24_
2012 May 15 19:43:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 1 negotiation failed due to time up for ip_site2[500]. f00cdb522a441665:0000000000000000_
2012 May 15 19:43:02 [Armazem] [IKE] Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1. _
2012 May 15 19:43:02 [Armazem] [IKE] Invalid SA protocol type: 0_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Setting DPD Vendor ID_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] NAT-Traversal is Enabled_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Beginning Aggressive mode._
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: ip_site1[500]<=>ip_site2[500]_
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] Configuration found for ip_site2._
2012 May 15 19:42:30 [Armazem] [IKE] accept a request to establish IKE-SA: ip_site2_
7 Replies
- tratoAspirantI solved this problem with SA life time equal in both routers.
At this time they are connected (IPsec SA Established), but ping of onw site to other does not respond.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!