NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Chuck_M
Mar 18, 2026Mentor
Backhaul Over OM3 Fiber
A crazy thought... I know..... I recently have been converting my home internal network to fiber to future-proof my setup. I have server racks with storage devices at both end of my home wh...
Chuck_M
Mar 18, 2026Mentor
So with the RBR in AP mode... it is currently fed as a separate and distinct line (knowing it is limited to 2.5 gig) which is independent from the rest of the house backbone which is fiber.
I also know that the line running from the RBR to the RBS performing backhaul has to be on the same trunk else it won't synch.
I wanted to be able to have a small switch where the RBS is that has 10G or higher capability (because there are devices near that would benefit from that speed).
Bottom line, probably dont NEED, just curious if it would work as I get rid of the dreaded cat 6
StephenB
Mar 18, 2026Guru - Experienced User
Chuck_M wrote:Bottom line, probably dont NEED, just curious if it would work as I get rid of the dreaded cat 6
Well the cat-6 cable can also carry 10 gbps, so I am puzzled on why you are determined to get rid of it. Isn't it possible to run fiber to that spot while leaving the cat-6 as it is?
If not, then you could run fiber to a small smart switch, and set up one VLAN to connect the RBR to the RBS, and a second VLAN to connect your other devices. But you could also connect a small smart switch to the back with cat-6, and use VLANs to accomplish the same thing.
- Chuck_MMar 19, 2026Mentor
I mean, it isn't a quest get rid of Cat 6 -- more like a goal. Primarily for four reasons: 1. Futureproofing, 2. Speed, 3. Size (I have a lot of cables coming into rack through a 3" PVC pipe -- every but saved makes running/replacing the others better. 4. The RJ-45 SFP+ connectors run hotter than lava, and I know they are the major source of heat in my IT closet.
I guess the real reason? Because I can :) The more I do, the more I learn. Guess that makes me a nerd!
- StephenBMar 19, 2026Guru - Experienced User
Chuck_M wrote:
I mean, it isn't a quest get rid of Cat 6 -- more like a goal.
Well, if practical I'd run fiber but keep that particular Cat-6 cable in place for now. Then add the 10 gbps switch at the RBS location connecting it to the fiber, but leave the cat-6 connected to the RBS.
Assuming you are limited to 10 gbps in your switches, then that doubles the bandwidth at the RBS location, and would allow both the RBS and the 10 gpbs equipment in that location to run at full speed. It also eliminates the need to set up VLANs to separate the backhaul traffic from the other stuff connected to the switch at the RBS.
FWIW, one advantage that RJ45 has over fiber is that RJ45 supports PoE. That can be useful for enterprise grade APs (which could be in your future), security cameras, and other devices.