NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
RSchwein
Mar 21, 2011Aspirant
WNDAP350's are constantly rebooting
WNDAP350 significant problems
I have 5 of these on various network segments over a large geographical area. All are using different wiring, different network switches, nothing in common with any of them except one thing. All are experiencing exactly the same problem.
Log excerpt
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: Network Integrality: Ping Failed
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: Network Integrality: Host: 10.110.255.254 is down.Bringing down all the vaps
Mar 21 11:41:51 kernel: brtrunk: port 2(wifi0vap0) entering disabled state
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: wifi0vap0: STA 00:1b:63:cc:f5:40 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: wifi0vap0: STA 00:26:4a:c1:51:26 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Here is what I've learned:
When there are no associations at all (over a weekend for example) there are no problems; pings are always successful.
After there are a couple (two or so) associations then the above occurs maybe about once every 4 hours. You start getting more associations then the “Ping Failed” occurs more frequently. On one where there are about 30 associations the failure occurs about every 20 minutes, sometimes more frequently.
I am aware that these 350s ping their respective default gateways. Examination of the router's respective logs show the routers are working flawlessly. Indeed, everyone “wired” on the various network segments are not having any problems. Each 350 has it's own Gig/sec connection. Measured network traffic is rarely over 3% of available capacity.
So, in the 350's firmware, is it waiting a shorter and shorter amount of time for a ping return as the number of associations increase? Therefore, it is timing out waiting for the return when if it would wait just a little longer it would be satisfied?
I've got to solve this problem before I can deploy anymore 350s. I'm not replacing anymore WAP54G's which are working just fine.
Thanks for any help here.
Bob
I have 5 of these on various network segments over a large geographical area. All are using different wiring, different network switches, nothing in common with any of them except one thing. All are experiencing exactly the same problem.
Log excerpt
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: Network Integrality: Ping Failed
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: Network Integrality: Host: 10.110.255.254 is down.Bringing down all the vaps
Mar 21 11:41:51 kernel: brtrunk: port 2(wifi0vap0) entering disabled state
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: wifi0vap0: STA 00:1b:63:cc:f5:40 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Mar 21 11:41:51 hostapd: wifi0vap0: STA 00:26:4a:c1:51:26 IEEE 802.11: disassociated
Here is what I've learned:
When there are no associations at all (over a weekend for example) there are no problems; pings are always successful.
After there are a couple (two or so) associations then the above occurs maybe about once every 4 hours. You start getting more associations then the “Ping Failed” occurs more frequently. On one where there are about 30 associations the failure occurs about every 20 minutes, sometimes more frequently.
I am aware that these 350s ping their respective default gateways. Examination of the router's respective logs show the routers are working flawlessly. Indeed, everyone “wired” on the various network segments are not having any problems. Each 350 has it's own Gig/sec connection. Measured network traffic is rarely over 3% of available capacity.
So, in the 350's firmware, is it waiting a shorter and shorter amount of time for a ping return as the number of associations increase? Therefore, it is timing out waiting for the return when if it would wait just a little longer it would be satisfied?
I've got to solve this problem before I can deploy anymore 350s. I'm not replacing anymore WAP54G's which are working just fine.
Thanks for any help here.
Bob
45 Replies
- RSchweinAspirantTomorrow I'm going to disable the auto channeling. I've already turned off the 5 GHtz radio, the rouge detection, ..... I've not unplugged them yet but, that just may be my last step. Well, selling them on Ebay may be the last step.:(
- RSchweinAspirantWell, I turned off auto channeling on all of them. I set them to least congested frequencies in their areas. About 1 hour later one of them went down. Same problem. Ping failure, turn off their Ethernet port but, it still continues to ping as if it's still connected even though it's turned off it's port. About 11 minutes later some kind of watchdog kicked in, cleared everything up, it turned it's Ethernet port back on and guess what..... ping success.
About the only thing left to turn off is the device it self by unplugging it.
By the way, this is not happening on just one 350. I have five of them and they are all doing the same thing. - RSchweinAspirantJust finished beta testing a firmware upgrade. Appears to have solved the problem.
Bob - overlookTutor
RSchwein wrote: Just finished beta testing a firmware upgrade. Appears to have solved the problem.
Bob
hi RSchwein
Could you tell me what beta release you have tested please ?
thank you - RSchweinAspirantCertainly; tomorrow afternoon when I get back to the office.
- RSchweinAspirantV2.0.18
Everything looking good. I'm sure Netgear will be coming out soon with an updated firmware version.
Bob - GlithAspirant2.0.18 is still working good? I hope Netgear will release it soon so I can try it out. :)
- lachliAspirantFinnaly someone elso who has this simmular problem. I spoke to netgear support (norway) regarding this problem, they just told me to reset to factory default and upgrade the firmware again. Of course this didnt change anything, any news on a new firmware?
- GlithAspirantRSchwein, any chance you could share 2.0.18 if it still is working good?
- GlithAspirant
RSchwein wrote: V2.0.18
Everything looking good. I'm sure Netgear will be coming out soon with an updated firmware version.
Bob
No news from Netgear yet. :(