NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.

Forum Discussion

jelabarre59's avatar
Dec 10, 2019
Solved

Importing address reservations, Nighthawk R7000

At this stage of development, WHY do you still not have a way of importing/exporting things like address reservations?   I have a spreadsheet of my machines/tablets/phones, and it would be really simple to bring them in all at once, were the UI designed correctly.

 

But as it is, I have to enter each reservation one at a time, clicking down into the screens needed.  And THEN once I've entered one, applying it exits the entry screen, and I have to go back into that screen again just to enter another single item.  Not very useful, especially since you aren't able to show me already entered devices in proper IP number order.

 


  • antinode wrote:

    > [...] I need to manually set the bits with a magnetized needle.

     

       I doubt that that would work well with modern, semiconductor devices.


    > There's a dedicated suggestions forum somewhere, for just such
    feature requests.


    The comment about a magnetized needle was sarcasm.  You have heard of sarcasm I presume?

    Yeah, I've made various suggestions over the years, I thought MAYBE they might have acted on some of them.  But that would be too much like doing WORK.

     

    No matter, this P.o.S. is going BACK to the store for my money back.   And appropriate product reviews posted.

     

    EDIT: Oh, BTW, don't bother replying, I already unsubscribed from the thread.

     

6 Replies

  • > [...] WHY [...]

     

       Presumably, because adding a command-line interface would be
    difficult, and not justify the investment.  And user errors would
    increase impressively, along with support costs.

     

    > [...] it would be really simple [...]

     

       If it's all _that_ simple, then let us know when you've got it
    working?

     

    > [...] show me already entered devices in proper IP number order.

     

       Put them in that way?

     

       Close to twenty years ago, I used a Cisco 678 which had (only) a
    command-line interface (with serial port or Telnet access), and I could
    easily copy+paste port-forwarding rules, and so on, when I wanted to.  I
    could also misconfigure the thing pretty easily.


       If you want professional-grade features, then get professional-grade
    equipment?

    • jelabarre59's avatar
      jelabarre59
      Star

      antinode wrote:

      > [...] WHY [...]

       

         Presumably, because adding a command-line interface would be
      difficult, and not justify the investment.  And user errors would
      increase impressively, along with support costs.

       

      > [...] show me already entered devices in proper IP number order.

       

         Put them in that way?

       

         If you want professional-grade features, then get professional-grade
      equipment?


      Oh, sorry, someone might actually have to do some WORK on their products...

       

      So you're saying I should have to DELETE all my entries and re-type them in order to have them sorted?  And if I'm adding devices in the middle of the list, go through that all over again?   Then WHY do we have an electronic device in the first place???   And if there's a mistake somewhere in the middle, delete them all and re-enter them again?   Next you're telling me I need to manually set the bits with a magnetized needle.

       

      "Professional Grade" equipment doesn't have parental controls/time controls.  Next brilliant idea?

      • antinode's avatar
        antinode
        Guru

        > Oh, sorry, someone might actually have to do some WORK on their
        > products...

         

           A little forum browsing ought to make it pretty clear that Netgear
        has finite resources to apply to firmware problems on these routers,
        many of which cause bigger problems than inconvenient data entry.  I
        _hope_ that they'd prioritize those resources in ways which would
        probably do nothing to ease your pain.

         

        > So you're saying [...]

         

           No, I'm saying that any resources which Netgear applied to your
        complaint would be unwisely spent, given all the other, more important
        problems which need their attention.

         

        > [...] I need to manually set the bits with a magnetized needle.

         

           I doubt that that would work well with modern, semiconductor devices.


        > "Professional Grade" equipment doesn't have parental controls/time
        > controls. Next brilliant idea?

         

           If no one else has produced the device which you want, then you can
        either pay someone to do it for you, or you can do it yourself.  Or you
        can wait for it to appear.

         

           As you may recall, you originally asked why some potentially
        desirable features were not (already) available (phrased as if someone
        from Netgear might be paying attention, and care.)  I believe that I
        answered that question (although my relationship to Netgear is, like
        yours, only as a victim).

         

           There's a dedicated suggestions forum somewhere, for just such
        feature requests.  I assume that it's mostly a black hole, so I haven't
        recorded its location, but I'd expect a Web search to find it without
        very much difficulty.