NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
MrCyberdude
Jun 27, 2010Tutor
Raid5 Failures HDD MTBF XRaid2 Raid6 Dual Redundancy
Why Raid5(Single Redundancy) is not enough and why Raid6(Dual Redundancy) is better. I was reading this with interest some time ago ..http://www.usenix.org/events/fast07/tech/schroeder/schroeder_ht...
StephenB
Nov 10, 2012Guru - Experienced User
I have read the papers. All we disagree on is the storagemojo article, which I think is misleading.
We agree that people should consider RAID-6 if they are using a large array - because as you say it is quite possible to have a second disk failure before the first disk is replaced and the array is rebuilt. In my view, you also need to have at least one independent copy of your data, and preferably two, which is a point you also make in the first post.
We agree that people should consider RAID-6 if they are using a large array - because as you say it is quite possible to have a second disk failure before the first disk is replaced and the array is rebuilt. In my view, you also need to have at least one independent copy of your data, and preferably two, which is a point you also make in the first post.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!