NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
ReadyNas 4312x surveillance video storage issue
We installed a ReadyNas RR4312X with 12x 6TB Seagate SkyHawk Surveillance drives in RAID-50 for Avigilon security camera storage. We started out with 55 cameras and it worked flawlessly but as we are...
Thanks for the fast reply StephenB ,
We are a school so the money simply isnt there for SSD drives. Currently we are maxing out the storage with the desired retension rate so changing to RAID 10 would further limit retension unless like you stated we went to larger drives.
I didn't see a CPU performance section. Unfortunately we have been closed for the last 5 weeks (spring break and COVID-19) so the 30-day chart is not represenative of average usage and I am unable to pull specific numbers.
Doblerm wrote:
I didn't see a CPU performance section. Unfortunately we have been closed for the last 5 weeks (spring break and COVID-19) so the 30-day chart is not represenative of average usage and I am unable to pull specific numbers.
Do you have ssh access remotely? If you do, then you can just run top.
The NAS is just storage, not running the surveillance app itself, correct?
With 16GB of RAM standard, I'd think that was enough, but you could try adding more. While it would require completely re-configuring the NAS, I wonder if it would help to have multiple volumes and the cameras spread out as to on which each puts it's data.
Are the cameras motion triggered, which means the demand fluctuates a lot, or continuous? If motion triggerred, have you noticed the problem worse during class changes when a lot are going to trigger at a time? Of course, modern codecs used by most security software compress unchanging data much smaller than changing data. So even if continuous monitoring is used, the data volume may increase with lots of motion all over campus.
The NAS is just the storage location and the application itself runs on another server. All cameras are set to record on motion. Time with many cameras recording on motion seems to make things a bit more sluggish.
The way that Avigilon writes to its storage is by populating the entire drive (as seen by Windows) with folders that it randomly writes to. I am unable to define which cameras write to which drives. To create multiple volumes would decrease the usable storage availabe and decrease retension.
Doblerm wrote:
The way that Avigilon writes to its storage is by populating the entire drive (as seen by Windows) with folders that it randomly writes to. I am unable to define which cameras write to which drives. To create multiple volumes would decrease the usable storage availabe and decrease retension.
I do understand that. The multiple volume idea was to reduce the disk I/O and perhaps improve seek performance. But thinking about it more, you already have the benefit of that with RAID-50. Another thought I had was that the CPU was getting stressed by the parity computations. That could be a factor.
I wondering about your workload though. You say you have a 780 MB/s write stream from 110 cameras. That's an extremely high data rate (56 megabits per camera), and you are saying they aren't continuously recording on top of that.
Is that correct??? What resolution and compression are you using that requires such a high data rate? 1080p Motion JPEG???
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!
