NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
ReadyNAS 628
Hi, There is an opportunity to acquire a ReadyNAS 628 for a good price but I was wondering if the platform is more or less dead and if it is worth the investment. It is a powerful unit and it should...
I ended up buying the ReadyNAS 628. For 500ish euros (used - diskless) I thought it was a fair deal. I am sure it will be as rock solid as the 2nd generation ReadyNAS units that are still going strong all these years later. Frankly, I don't need any exotic software running in them, I just want raw storage. I can have proper software running in different proper servers doing all the exotic stuff I could possibly ever need. There is something that has been puzzling me though. Netgear never managed to get the attention of the internet on the post 2015(ish?) units, there is countless videos on Synology and Qnap units or from other vendors, there is plenty of material on the NV+, NVX, Utra, Pro lines but not much after that. I wonder why. Didn't the marketing team think it was worth shipping free units to vloggers to test (and build brand awareness)? Financially wise, how has ReadyNAS performed for Netgear I wonder both in the home/SOHO space but also in the SME space?
All the best,
It is my belief that the failure to officially offer OS6 to legacy users, even at a cost, was a factor in the downslide of attention by the faithful. Hell, they didn't even offer an easy way to move from a legacy machine to an OS6 one. The loss of the "Jedi" from Infrant probably also contributed. It just took some time before these affects was noticeable. Many of those faithful users were the ones making apps. And since Netgear doesn't seem to want to make any itself from which they can't make more money, that caused other users to make other choices. If Netgear had listened to the posts in the Idea Exchange and implemented Docker as an official app instead of falsely marking it as "implemented" when it was not fully implemented nor their own work, that would have helped make more apps available without the need for ReadyNAS specific ones and may have made a difference.
Personally, I don't run a lot of apps on my NAS except ones specifically for remote access (ZeroTier, ddclient, and OwnCloud) and improved use (SMB Plus Kernel Plus, Linux dash), so I wasn't swayed by the lack of apps. But many potential users at least think they will want to run them. And, really, just why do you need all the extra processing power in the later line of OS6 machines except to run apps?
In similar fashion, dropping ReadyData like a hot rock and also giving no path to ReadyNASOS (which will run on them) probably also made businesses shy away, wondering if that'd be similarly abandoned if they switched to ReadyNAS. At least those that weren't puzzled from the beginning why ReadyData existed at all.
The fact that Linux Jessie, upon which OS6 is currently based, was already long in the tooth, yet the new line didn't come with an update or even a hint that one was coming, probably also played a part for users to choose another brand instead of upgrading to a newer ReadyNAS. And as existing users abandon it, so go word of mouth recommendations.
Makes sense. In all fairness, for most of the older units it is not really easy to port ReadyNAS OS 6 due to hardware considerations. For x86_64 based units it was possible and Netgear did not restrict it if you were willing to have a go at it. OS6 worked really fine in my Ultra2. As for processing power, I guess a Xeon-D is needed for supporting multiple 10g interfaces. Personally I wouldn't want to run anything else in a NAS, I can run Owncloud in a VM with the latest and greatest software with the NAS as a backend feeding raw storage to the hypervisor (whichever hypervisor you like, why limit yourself?).
beglitis wrote:I can run Owncloud in a VM with the latest and greatest software with the NAS as a backend feeding raw storage to the hypervisor (whichever hypervisor you like, why limit yourself?).
Yes, you can, but that runs a lot of traffic over your intranet that would be strictly internal to the NAS with OwnCloud running on it. My main use for OwnCloud is to share directories (that are not individual shares) that already exist on the NAS. So, I mount them read-only as external (to OwnCloud) and don't have to duplicate them in the storage space for Owncloud. I can then give access to users via OwnCloud at a more defined level than the NAS provides and never even give them an account on the NAS.
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!
