NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Solved
eth0 goes on and off-line
Every time the network printer turns on, I recieve an error message from my RN31440 NAS saying "System: Bond interface bond0 has slave interface eth0 offline." It re-connects almost immediately, but...
Am using the two ethernet ports on the RN314 in bonded mode, using LACP (layer 2 & 3). Both are connected directly to individual ports on a router. The printer, router and NAS are all connected to the same UPS.
NASty1 wrote:
Both are connected directly to individual ports on a router.
What router (manufacturer and model)?
The router was the AS-RT86U asus router. It doesn't support link aggregation...., and I should have purchased the AS-RT88U. Think I'll just get the Netgear router that supports LACP. It was my purchasing error, so it will be my expense. Thanks to everyone who took the time to assist me!! KUDO's to all!
NASty1 wrote:
Think I'll just get the Netgear router that supports LACP.
To set expectations here: NIC bonding can only increase performance if you have multiple devices accessing the NAS simultaneously. In the specific case of LACP, each data flow is assigned to a particular NIC using the "xmit hash".
If you only have two devices using the NAS at the same time, then if two flows end up being assigned to the same NIC, the other NIC is unused - so there can be no performance gain. The odds of a flow being assigned to a specific NIC is of course 50%. If you have two simultaneous flows, the odds of them being assigned to different NICs card is also 50%. If the flows are bi-directional, the odds of both directions of both flows being assigned to different NICs is only 25%.
For most home users, there isn't going to be much (if any) performance gain. And if you want to guarantee that both NICs will be used whenever possible, then you'd need to use a static LAG on the switch and round-robin in the NAS. While some Netgear home routers support LACP, I don't know of any that support static LAG.
If you want to pursue NIC bonding, then I'd suggest purchasing a switch that supports static LAG (and ideally also LACP) - using that instead of a router). You might also consider getting a multi-gig switch, as that would allow you to upgrade the NAS to a model that supports 10 gigabit ethernet (10GBase-T) in the future.
The Netgear GS810EMX has two 10GBase-T ports and supports both static LAG and LACP. So I'd suggest getting that instead of replacing the router. It gives you more options.
NASty1 wrote:
The router was the AS-RT86U asus router. It doesn't support link aggregation
That's not a problem, no need to rush for a new router - as I wrote above, just use Adaptive Load Balancing on the ReadyNAS ... most non-managed switches are fine with this.
schumaku wrote:
NASty1 wrote:
The router was the AS-RT86U asus router. It doesn't support link aggregation
That's not a problem, no need to rush for a new router - as I wrote above, just use Adaptive Load Balancing on the ReadyNAS ... most non-managed switches are fine with this.
Yes, that is something you can try for free, and it does work with most equipment. If you see misbehaviour, then just turn it off again (and remove the second ethernet cable).
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!
