NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
Solved
A very LONG scrub
I manually kicked off my first scrub about four hours ago. I'm running 4x4TB WDC Reds @ 5400 RPM on RAID6, resulting in a 7.27TB volume. These are my present stats, calculated in Excel: % ...
The scrub will speed up a bit once the filesystem portion of the scrub finishes. But it'll never be "fast" using RAID6 on a RN104. RAID5 can offload some parity calculation work to a specialized engine on the CPU, but no such engine exists for RAID6 on the RN104 CPU, and RAID6 is much more computationally intensive than RAID5. You'd probably have a better experience using RAID10 on RN104.
> RAID5 can offload some parity calculation work to a specialized engine
> on the CPU, but no such engine exists for RAID6 on the RN104 CPU
Hi Skywalker, what about the RN204?
Thanks,
Jeff Bowman
Fairbanks, Alaska
So if you want to continue to use RAID-6 the choice would be to consider whether to get the RN204 or the RN214.
The RN214 is a better choice if you wish to e.g. use Plex transcoding, use the anti-virus service and/or use NIC bonding on the NAS with multiple clients accessing the NAS at the same time on a wired gigabit network.
> So if you want to continue to use RAID-6 the choice would
> be to consider whether to get the RN204 or the RN214
I guess it'll be the RN204 for now. That'll get me by until I eventually get my 516.
But this RN104 has got to go! :-)
Thanks,
Jeff Bowman
Fairbanks, Alaska
NETGEAR Academy
Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!
