NETGEAR is aware of a growing number of phone and online scams. To learn how to stay safe click here.
Forum Discussion
aks-2
Sep 28, 2020Apprentice
Copy files/folders via dashboard OS6.10.3 / RN214
After transferring files from a NV+v2 to a RN214 in a bulk 'backup' transfer, I then wanted to move the files and folders to specic areas on the RN214. I did this via the dashboard>shares.
Firstly, my old NV+v2 used OS5 and I mostly managed files/folders via SSH mv when I needed to move large data sets. Obviously, the moves were pretty instant, even on this older platform. Because OS6 works a bit differently, translate that to "I don't know the quirks with OS6 :smileyhappy:", I decided to use the web I/F instead - drag+drop.
Moving files takes an absolute age, 39GB took ~20 minutes, that's effectively 2GB/min or 33MB/sec. Wow, that seems extremely slow for an on drive move. However, I was moving from a share to a user home area, and unlike OS5 that uses ext4 (I think), OS6 is using BTRFS, and user home areas an created differently (again, I think).
Nothing else was active on the RN214, and it has OS6.10.3 installed.
Via ssh I could not see a copy/move process, but I did see this "fsbroker.cgi" process during moves:
20928 ? Dsl 0:08 /frontview/lib/fsbroker.cgi
This is clearly not an efficient way to move files. Thoughts?
8 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- StephenBGuru - Experienced User
I haven't timed copying files in the web ui, and usually just use drag/drop.
Do you have snapshots enabled on the source share? If you did, then a move would result in the original files ending up in a snapshot on the source, and with a copy placed in the destination. Free space would be reduced as a result.
In general, moves using drag-and-drop are instant when you are reorganizing a share, but moves turn into copy-delete when you are moving files between shares.
The absolute fastest way to move files quickly is to use cp --reflink from ssh, and then delete the originals. The --reflink bit tells btrfs not to copy the datablocks, but instead to clone the metadata.
- aks-2Apprentice
No snapshots, just plain shares, of course from a share to a home share breaks the boundary you mention.
But, 2GB/min seems extremely slow, it's even slower than a LAN copy! I'll do some more testing, so far this is not impressing me over the freedom and flexibility of OS5!
- StephenBGuru - Experienced User
aks-2 wrote:
But, 2GB/min seems extremely slow, it's even slower than a LAN copy! I'll do some more testing, so far this is not impressing me over the freedom and flexibility of OS5!
It does seem very slow. I just did a copy/paste of an 8.7 GB file on my own RN202 using the web browser interface, and the paste took just a few seconds.
Related Content
NETGEAR Academy

Boost your skills with the Netgear Academy - Get trained, certified and stay ahead with the latest Netgear technology!
Join Us!